On Thursday, September 22, 2011, Dale Puch wrote:
> Personally I like the idea of seperating out portions of the database into
separate sections, but I prefer more use orientated divisions.
>
> [snip]
There are many good reasons for all of this data to be together in the
master database such as s
On 9/22/2011 4:11 PM, Dale Puch wrote:
land use
admin boundaries
These two will generally share nodes (if mapped properly, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.6015&lon=-81.419&zoom=16&layers=M
rather than TIGER's horrible approximations) and so should be combined.
Most of the others y
Was RE: [Talk-us] California landuse import
Personally I like the idea of seperating out portions of the database into
separate sections, but I prefer more use orientated divisions.
Piste (skiing)
land use
roads
utilities
admin boundaries
marine
buildings
Are some examples. Things that can be t
3 matches
Mail list logo