Re: [Talk-us] OpenMetaMap

2011-09-23 Thread AJ Ashton
On Thursday, September 22, 2011, Dale Puch wrote: > Personally I like the idea of seperating out portions of the database into separate sections, but I prefer more use orientated divisions. > > [snip] There are many good reasons for all of this data to be together in the master database such as s

Re: [Talk-us] OpenMetaMap

2011-09-22 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 9/22/2011 4:11 PM, Dale Puch wrote: land use admin boundaries These two will generally share nodes (if mapped properly, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.6015&lon=-81.419&zoom=16&layers=M rather than TIGER's horrible approximations) and so should be combined. Most of the others y

Re: [Talk-us] OpenMetaMap

2011-09-22 Thread Dale Puch
Was RE: [Talk-us] California landuse import Personally I like the idea of seperating out portions of the database into separate sections, but I prefer more use orientated divisions. Piste (skiing) land use roads utilities admin boundaries marine buildings Are some examples. Things that can be t