Re: [Talk-us] Tagging historic US routes

2020-03-13 Thread Greg Morgan
Only one person cared about US 80 in osm. I have deleted portions of the route because parts of it are artificial ways to make the route render. These artificial ways interfered with other mapping. You can do what you want with the route including deleting. On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:47 PM Tod

Re: [Talk-us] Tagging historic US routes

2020-03-05 Thread Paul Johnson
Try network=US:US:Historic on your route relation. Might not render, but you can at least give renderers *something* for renderers to latch onto if they want that information. ref=US Historic xx seems to be the way tagging for that if you want to go that route. I recommend, until we can finally

[Talk-us] Tagging historic US routes

2020-03-05 Thread Tod Fitch
This weekend I drove part of AZ-79 and noticed that Arizona has now put up some “Historic US 80” signage. On the sections of highway I drove, every occurrence of a AZ-79 route marker now also has a historic US-80 route marker. (Back in the day that highway was dual signed as US-80 and US-89 but