On 22 Feb 2010, at 23:39 , Stellan Lagerstrom wrote:
> Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>> did someone contact this user? any feedback?
>> he/she reverted the whole revert again.
>> Will try to revert some of the worst areas for now but can't spend to much
>> time on this.
>>
>>
> We had a brief ex
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> did someone contact this user? any feedback?
> he/she reverted the whole revert again.
> Will try to revert some of the worst areas for now but can't spend to much
> time on this.
>
>
We had a brief exchange of emails through the OSM site. I wondered why
so much te
did someone contact this user? any feedback?
he/she reverted the whole revert again.
Will try to revert some of the worst areas for now but can't spend to much time
on this.
On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:27 , Stellan Lagerstrom wrote:
> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
> re
Didn't find time to check this earlier. this is entirely wrong and the
changeset commetn tells it all 'more likely to be tertiary than residential, in
this area'
any objections to revert this changeset as a whole?
revert will skip all ways which have been touched in the meantime. It might
leave
Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Stellan Lagerstrom writes:
>
>> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
>> residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
>> This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
>> not thoroughfares, etc.
>> Views?
>> Here's one
Stellan Lagerstrom wrote:
> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
> residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
> This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
> not thoroughfares, etc.
> Views?
> Here's one changeset: http://www.openstreetm
this aesthetic makes a map attractive and useful to the reader.
From: Greg Troxel
To: Matthias Julius
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tue, January 5, 2010 7:37:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Use of highway=tertiary
Matthias Julius writes:
> G
Matthias Julius writes:
> Greg Troxel writes:
>
>> Stellan Lagerstrom writes:
>>
>>> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
>>> residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
>>> This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
>>> not thorough
Greg Troxel writes:
> Stellan Lagerstrom writes:
>
>> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
>> residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
>> This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
>> not thoroughfares, etc.
>> Views?
>> Here's one
Stellan Lagerstrom writes:
> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
> residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
> This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
> not thoroughfares, etc.
> Views?
> Here's one changeset: http://www.openstre
On 1/4/10 5:27 PM, Stellan Lagerstrom wrote:
> We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
> residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
> This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
> not thoroughfares, etc.
> Views?
> Here's one changeset: http
We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
not thoroughfares, etc.
Views?
Here's one changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3519089
/Stell
12 matches
Mail list logo
