I would tag *access=destination* here, and hope routers don't use that
route unless the way is within the bounding box (or at least near) to my
destination.
My apologies for not playing catchup by reading the entire thread.
The context of 'access' seemed to me used only in cases where the
I would tag *access=destination* here, and hope routers don't use that route
unless the way is within the bounding box (or at least near) to my
destination.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
i suppose OSM could use access=permissive for
the preferred route, but that usage doesn't match
well with the current language for permissive.
Richard, I'm not sure this is a perfect solution, but it could work.
What about using access=destination (Only when travelling to this
element...) on
I don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems easy
enough to me to program a router do not use roads with access=private
unless they are the first or last segment of a route or something along
those lines.
RE: access=destination. Not sure what the convention is in the US,
On 1/1/15 6:00 PM, Harald Kliems wrote:
I don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems
easy enough to me to program a router do not use roads with
access=private unless they are the first or last segment of a route
or something along those lines.
well, it is an issue
Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com writes:
I don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems
easy enough to me to program a router do not use roads with
access=private unless they are the first or last segment of a route
or something along those lines.
RE: access=destination.
The equivalent sign in the USA states either No Thru Traffic or Local
Traffic Only. While the standard written spelling is through, the
shortened spelling Thru is standard on road signs.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.
7 matches
Mail list logo
