Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

On Sep 24, 2017 8:33 AM, "Greg Troxel" wrote: Adam Franco writes: > One additional note is that at least in my area, the TIGER import > incorrectly added access=private to many driveways and privately maintained > residential roads. Upon surveying these

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

Adam Franco writes: > One additional note is that at least in my area, the TIGER import > incorrectly added access=private to many driveways and privately maintained > residential roads. Upon surveying these I've found that they are signed > "Private" or "PVT" on the

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

On 9/14/2017 12:23 AM, David Wisbey wrote: I limit the use of "residential" to typical residential city or town government-maintained streets. I use "living street" for residential streets that are completely open to the public but not maintained by the local or state government; they

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

I'm posting this response on behalf of David Wisbey: "I have been a volunteer mapper for about 6 years and have developed a way of mapping the various different kinds of residential streets/roads. I limit the use of "residential" to typical residential city or town government-maintained

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Ionut Radu - (p) wrote: > Hi all, > > > > While editing road geometry in Phoenix we found some situations that are > arguable, considering the private districts/neighborhoods/trailer parks > and other strata-style developments, with/without

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

Thanks for the clear guidelines, Greg. One additional note is that at least in my area, the TIGER import incorrectly added access=private to many driveways and privately maintained residential roads. Upon surveying these I've found that they are signed "Private" or "PVT" on the street-name sign

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

On 2017.09.13. 16:13, Andrew Matheny wrote: > I agree with everything Greg has said. > > In the US, whether you tag a highway residential or service should > generally be determined by its function, not its access. > > In the case of a gated community of single family homes, the named > streets

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

I agree with everything Greg has said. In the US, whether you tag a highway residential or service should generally be determined by its function, not its access. In the case of a gated community of single family homes, the named streets serve the same function as named streets in other

Re: [Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

"Ionut Radu - (p)" writes: > For us it's a little bit confusing if we should map those areas with > service, residential roads or even living streets and if there are > some gates at the entrance if we should tag them with restrictive > access. So, if you know some rules

[Talk-us] guidelines regarding roads access

Hi all, While editing road geometry in Phoenix we found some situations that are arguable, considering the private districts/neighborhoods/trailer parks and other strata-style developments, with/without street names and with/without gates at the entrance: - streets are mapped as residential