Re: [Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-26 Thread Minh Nguyen
arch_arch@... writes: > I've detected a user who damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City. I've tried to contact the > user but I got no reaction. I've told the mapper that iD editor is inappropriate, as it has no built in > validator but he didn't stop the edits. > > I want to ask so

Re: [Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-26 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Greg Morgan wrote: > The last thing that I would want to do is involve the Data > Working Group. I'm sending this mail as a DWG member- but I'm only speaking for myself, and not on behalf of the DWG. I don't think most people realize that the DWG will often get

Re: [Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-26 Thread Greg Morgan
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:13 PM, arch_a...@t-online.de < arch_a...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I've detected a user who damages administrative boundaries around Rapid > City. I've tried to contact the user but I got no reaction. I've told the > mapper that iD editor is inappropriate, as it ha

[Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-25 Thread arch_a...@t-online.de
Hello, I've detected a user who damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City. I've tried to contact the user but I got no reaction. I've told the mapper that iD editor is inappropriate, as it has no built in validator but he didn't stop the edits. I want to ask someone from the US to ta