On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:44 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:58:38 -0500, Chris Hunter wrote: NE2 has been
>>making a number of questionable edits in the northwest Oregon area
>>recently; I wonder if it's possible to smack 'em upside the head with a
>>
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:58:38 -0500, Chris Hunter wrote:
> Last night, user NE2 "cleaned up" the interstate system by merging all
> of the states with 2 relations per interstate back into 1 relation with
> direction-based roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I
> was working on, bu
posted that earlier already
mkgmap does what you put in the style file. default style does not include
ref relations.
mapnik doesn't support it
don't know about osmarender
you can update the wiki. everyone can edit. I don't care and will not start
a edit war or wiki edit war because this data isn
Yes, I know it's arguably tagging for the renderer, but can someone else
update the WIKI to explain how mkgmap, mapnik, and osmarender handle the ref
tag?
AFAIK NE2 is tagging for the editor in this case.
Thanks,
Chris Hunter
DiverCTH
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 2
Dave Hansen wrote:
> Yeah, that's sane. If for no other reason than the fact that the mile
> markers reset at state lines. I guess they're also the maintenance
> boundaries.
You'd guess wrong. They're at least as low as county level, at least in
my state.
Jeffrey Ollie writes:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Julius wrote:
>> Jeffrey Ollie writes:
>>
>>> What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
>>> what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
>>> interstate/highway number (e.g. "90" or "80") and not "I
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Jeffrey Ollie writes:
>
>> What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
>> what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
>> interstate/highway number (e.g. "90" or "80") and not "I 90 (MN)".
>
> And I don't like
Jeffrey Ollie writes:
> What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
> what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
> interstate/highway number (e.g. "90" or "80") and not "I 90 (MN)".
And I don't like this at all. First, this seems to be different than
how this is
Oh, and yes I did contact them via both the OSM Messaging system and the
WIKI's messaging system.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Hunter wrote:
> I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
> temporary ban on their account? They've been editing all day.
>
>
> O
I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
temporary ban on their account? They've been editing all day.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 2/7/10 9:23 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>>
>> What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs.
On 2/7/10 9:23 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
> What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
> what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
> interstate/highway number (e.g. "90" or "80") and not "I 90 (MN)". I
> use the ref on the relation when building maps for my Garmi
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:
>
> Last night, user NE2 "cleaned up" the interstate system by merging all of
> the states with 2 relations per interstate back into 1 relation with
> direction-based roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I was
> working on, but
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:42 -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
> i concur with the notion of splitting at state lines. i also think
> that the longer US routes need
> to be handled in a similar manner.
Yeah, that's sane. If for no other reason than the fact that the mile
markers reset at state lines. I
On 2/7/10 1:58 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:
According to the WIKI and some discussions back in April
(http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-April/000976.html)
and again in September
(http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-September/001597.html),
the US Interstate syst
14 matches
Mail list logo
