On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik bsup...@xsquawkbox.net wrote:
Hi Y'all,
The USGS was kind enough to send me the latest shapefile extract for the
NHD yesterday. So my question is: is there some way I can process and
repost this data that would make it more suitable for importers?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:20 AM, James Umbanhowar jumba...@unc.edu wrote:
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 09:09:21 Ian Dees wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik bsup...@xsquawkbox.net
wrote:
Snip
I could rehost the NHD files on my company's servers for a while,
perhaps
even in
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik bsup...@xsquawkbox.net wrote:
Hi Y'all,
The USGS was kind enough to send me the latest shapefile extract for the
NHD yesterday. So my question is: is there some way I can process
Hi Y'all,
From what I can tell:
- Every water body does get a reach ID. I've seen nulls in this file
but haven't yet figured out what they are...in local sample areas, all
water bodies have reach IDs.
- If there is linkeage between areas and flow lines (which I _thought_
there was when
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 12:50:41 Ben Supnik wrote:
Hi Y'all,
From what I can tell:
- Every water body does get a reach ID. I've seen nulls in this file
but haven't yet figured out what they are...in local sample areas, all
water bodies have reach IDs.
- If there is linkeage between
On 4/26/2011 12:50 PM, Ben Supnik wrote:
Richard's idea of building an NHD tile map for tracing seems very
do-able, but it wouldn't save a ton of time - every water feature would
have to be hand-traced, even though we do have them in vector form already.
I'm not at all comfortable with the
6 matches
Mail list logo
