SteveCoast writes:
> If anything parcels will be hard. That's a good thing. If we want to take
> the easy route we should give up now.
Well, as Josh points out, parcels are not necessarily related to
anything on the ground. They could be, e.g. my property lines are
co-incident with stone walls,
Thanks Brian. I hear the point of view, I just don't want it to be (too)
overstated.
Steve
PS check out my kickstarter
projecthttp://www.kickstarter.com/projects/237731198/gps-art-poster
On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:39 PM, SteveCoast wrote
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:39 PM, SteveCoast wrote:
> Majority of what exactly? I think it's tough to put much credence in a
> couple of people on this mailing list vs. anyone who added data this month
> as statistically valid.
Fair enough. I'll downgrade my statement from "majority" to "concern
I'm not arguing that life is easy with parcels. I'm questioning the majority
statement.
If anything parcels will be hard. That's a good thing. If we want to take the
easy route we should give up now.
Steve
PS check out my kickstarter
projecthttp://www.kickstarter.com/projects/237731198/gps-ar
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:39 PM, SteveCoast wrote:
> Majority of what exactly? I think it's tough to put much credence in a
> couple of people on this mailing list vs. anyone who added data this month
> as statistically valid.
>
If you haven't done so already, please try editing an area that has
Majority of what exactly? I think it's tough to put much credence in a couple
of people on this mailing list vs. anyone who added data this month as
statistically valid.
Steve
PS check out my kickstarter
projecthttp://www.kickstarter.com/projects/237731198/gps-art-poster
On Feb 25, 2013, at 1
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Brian May wrote:
> On 2/21/2013 7:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed interest in
>> participating in creating some sort of open repository for parcel
>> data. I was imagining a conference
We can put them on the OSM US server.
So far the best suggestion to keep track of which data we've collected is
the Google Doc spreadsheet I have set up. I'm happy to transfer this
information to somewhere else if a better option comes up.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jason Remillard
wrote:
> +1 on this, one step at a time. Lets just get the data first.
>
>> I don't think we should worry about importing or standardizing into anything
>> yet. That step should happen once we have a pretty good size sample of the
>> data so we can
+1 on this, one step at a time. Lets just get the data first.
> I don't think we should worry about importing or standardizing into anything
> yet. That step should happen once we have a pretty good size sample of the
> data so we can figure out what's available.
Thanks
Jason.
__
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I always find it boggling that open data projects are willing to use
> google docs and google hangouts. It would be really nice to at least
> have the data in a free software/free culture compatible place like an
> OSM foundation server.
I
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
>
> Regarding the data gathering, the main objective is to gather recent
> raw data, licensing terms, and meta data from jurisdictions in
> whatever form they make it available, organize it in a dumb directory
> structure. I was just going t
Hello all,
I mentioned a few months back that there are several places, particularly
fere in the midwest, that don't own their own parcel data. Here in the St
Louis area many of the counties have actually leased their parcel data from
a private company for decades. The yearly lease includes an e
On 2/22/13 12:35 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I always find it boggling that open data projects are willing to use
google docs and google hangouts. It would be really nice to at least
have the data in a free software/free culture compatible place
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I always find it boggling that open data projects are willing to use
> google docs and google hangouts. It would be really nice to at least
> have the data in a free software/free culture compatible place like an
> OSM foundation server.
Wh
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed interest in
> participating in creating some sort of open repository for parcel
> data. I was imagining a conference call or something to discuss next
> steps, but I
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
> Interesting. How does parcel data work? What does it cover and what's the
> data interesting for OSM in it? Is this about sourcing address data?
>
Parcel data is interesting to OSM because it usually has addressing
information. It's interestin
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Brian May writes:
>
>> I also think we need a little bit more sophisticated Data Catalog than
>> a google spreadsheet.
>
>> Email and a wiki page sounds good to me for coordination. Maybe we can
>> bring it up in a Mappy Hour as well. And if
Interesting. How does parcel data work? What does it cover and what's the
data interesting for OSM in it? Is this about sourcing address data?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed interest in
> particip
Brian May writes:
> I also think we need a little bit more sophisticated Data Catalog than
> a google spreadsheet.
> Email and a wiki page sounds good to me for coordination. Maybe we can
> bring it up in a Mappy Hour as well. And if there's enough of a need,
> we could do a separate parcels /
On 2/21/2013 7:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
Hey guys,
In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed interest in
participating in creating some sort of open repository for parcel
data. I was imagining a conference call or something to discuss next
steps, but I think we can advance
21 matches
Mail list logo
