On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:25 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
addr:housenumber contains both the number
and the building letter in the same field. The map is useful because
you can find the building. How have other people tried to handle these
On Feb 5, 2015 5:30 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:48 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Generally, it is not feasible to use OSM as a dataset backing an
official GTFS feed. This is because the probability of the GTFS
dataset being uploaded to Google and thereby
On February 4, 2015 10:25:02 PM CST, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org
wrote:
It seems to be addr:unit, though it’s not widely used. It’s what
I’ve been
using, though.
I punted. When Josm added a preset that included addr:flats, then I
started using that tag. Right or wrong I figured most of the other
tags are Euro-English coloured, so to speak, that it did not mater if
I used addr:flats verses addr:unit.
__
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:25 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
addr:housenumber contains both the number
and the building letter in the same field. The map is useful because
you can find the building. How have other people tried to handle these
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
wrote:
Including a unit number in the house number is incorrect and potentially
confusing. There are house numbers that have a prefix or suffix as part of
the house number, that's a different thing. It just depends on how
On 2/4/2015 11:25 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
addr:housenumber contains both the number
and the building letter in the same field. The map is useful because
you can find the building. How have other people tried to handle these
situations?
I haven't tried in any meaningful way. It's too early
7 matches
Mail list logo
