Am 17/mar/2014 um 02:28 schrieb Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com:
If I need to split a building, the original primary key does not stay with
one of the two pieces of the building. Two new buildings are created with
two new primary keys.
as a side note this is not like you
Hi Folks,
Wanted to let everyone know that we scheduled the inaugural QGIS US
User Group Meeting the day before the State of the Map US at
OpenGovHub in DC. http://qgis.us/#meetings You are all welcome to join
us.
Also, if someone is up for giving a talk or even a short workshop on
using QGIS
Hi all,
Hrm, four days in and we already ran out of stuff to do on
MapRoulette! Not bad, but I know you're all eager to continue fixing
stuff - so we're working to get new challenges up.
As always, if you have ideas, share them here:
I'm going to just point out the elephant in the room here. I don't think any
normal user cares about the license at all. I think the actual reason its hard
to get new mappers, especially those that are not nerdy and obsessive like
myself is that *the ontology sucks*. There, I said it, so you
Such a thing already mostly exists in the preset system. iD has a fairly
extensive and growing set of presets that I encourage you to try (it
follows the example you give).
JOSM also has a preset system, but it's not nearly as obvious or as
complete (at least for the mapping I do). You access it
Hi Charles,
Have you looked at iD's preset-based feature editing UI? It's very close to
what you describe:
- Machine readable
ontologyhttps://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/data/presets/README.md
- Search-based UI
- No detailed knowledge of tagging schemes necessary
- Customized UI for
JOSM also has a plugin that provides a UI for entering opening_hours.
That being said, this UI is in JOSM, but new users are probably going to use iD
since it's easy to use and is right there (quick availability).
--
Saikrishna Arcot
On Monday, March 17, 2014 01:20:12 PM Ian Dees wrote:
Such
Just posted my comments to key points that came up in the conversation over
on the diary:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21221#comment25849
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Hello everyone -
I've been sitting on writing about the detrimental
Alex,
Some of the points you continue to make are patently false.
1. There is more open data coming online by the day and we are not compatible
Let's take this apart. If the data is open, by which you mean that
it would fall into something like the definition of
freedomdefined.org, then there
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.comwrote:
Weird is a matter of opinion, but I only know of Farm Road (FM), Ranch
Road (RM or RR), Park Road (PR), the one-off NASA Road 1 (which I can
concede is a bit unusual), the semi-standard Spur and Loop, and normal
state
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:17 AM, o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote:
I'm going to just point out the elephant in the room here. I don't think
any
normal user cares about the license at all. I think the actual reason its
hard
to get new mappers, especially those that are not nerdy and obsessive
I made exactly this point a while back on the diversity-talk list.
The consequence of this is that by self-limiting *who* the mappers are, we also
limit the types of things that will ever appear on the map.
It’s even evident in your statement This map geek and his son?” — a point that
well
2014-03-18 1:32 GMT+01:00 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:17 PM, o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote:
The tagging of things bears little resemblance to things in the real
world:
I agree, first of all, i tried to explain to someone how to tag a cafe/bar
and
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014, at 01:17 PM, o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote:
I'm going to just point out the elephant in the room here. I don't think
any normal user cares about the license at all. I think the actual reason its
hard to get new mappers, especially those that are not nerdy and obsessive
Don't think so, just look for primary sources (their own web site) and
we should be fine. I would personally not copy from Google or other
secondary sources - just to be on the safe side.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I like it, just a concern.
Any
15 matches
Mail list logo
