On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM Dave F via Tagging <
tagg...@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 22/11/2020 11:24, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>
> I sincerely hope "I'm in favor of fixing" translates as "I'm planning to
> fix", though I fear I may be disappointed.
>
> More broadly, we need to nip this
Nov 22, 2020, 17:08 by tagg...@openstreetmap.org:
> Likewise we need to stop software developers from expectingcontributors
> to add data purely because they can't be bothered/notcompetent enough to
> write a few lines of code. (OSM-carto demandingboundaries on ways)
>
[citation
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 539,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/13975/
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log
[cross-posted to talk-us@ and tagging@, please choose your follow-ups wisely]
Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
> It seems that we are increasingly doing things to simplify the
> model because certain tooling can't handle the real level of
> complexity that exists in the real world. I'm in favor of
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020, at 18:06, Clay Smalley wrote:
> Many long-distance Amtrak trains have route relations with 1000+
> members. If I split one way that happens to be a member of one of these
> routes, I end up with a changeset with a gigantic bounding box, and
> often get edit conflicts due to
5 matches
Mail list logo
