Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-09.txt

This includes updates based on review from Magnus. (Thanks again for the help!) Best, Chris On Sat, Sep 28, 2019, at 7:48 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Transport

Re: [Taps] call for agenda items at TAPS IETF-104

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:53 AM Aaron Falk wrote: > > Hi All- > > What should we use our time to discuss? Let’s focus on things that would > benefit from f2f discussion, consensus building, or just argument. :) > > TAPS docs: are there open topics that need group attention? Seems like we >

Re: [Taps] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-04

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:29 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Christopher Wood wrote: > > > We just posted a revision to this document incorporating updates based > > on your comments [1]. (Thanks again for your careful review!) If you > > have time t

Re: [Taps] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-04

-ietf-taps-transport-security/ On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:56 AM Christopher Wood wrote: > > (ietf to bcc to minimize spam) > > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for the feedback! Please see inline below. > > On 25 Nov 2018, at 21:40, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > Reviewer: Paul Wout

Re: [Taps] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-04

(ietf to bcc to minimize spam) Hi Paul, Thanks for the feedback! Please see inline below. On 25 Nov 2018, at 21:40, Paul Wouters wrote: Reviewer: Paul Wouters Review result: Has Issues Review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-04 I have reviewed this document as part of the security

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-03.txt

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 2:35 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > Just following up ... > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:34 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF > wrote: >> >> Hi, Christopher, >> >> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 12:08 AM Christopher Wood >> wrote: &

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-03.txt

Hi Theresa, Apologies for the delayed response. Please see inline below. On 27 Oct 2018, at 1:03, Theresa Enghardt wrote: Hi Chris, I'm replying to your questions inline: On 27.10.2018 07:05, Christopher Wood wrote: In Section 5, the document groups security features into mandatory

Re: [Taps] security parameters in draft-ietf-taps-interface

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:17 AM Aaron Falk wrote: > > In preface, I almost know enough about transport security to be dangerous so > I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable will clarify for me... > > In section 5.3.1 of draft-ietf-taps-interface-02 a number of different > security parameters are

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-03.txt

Hi Theresa, Please see inline below. On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:15 AM Theresa Enghardt wrote: > Dear TAPS, > > having shepherded the minset draft, and, in the process, having seen a > lot of discussion around security, where we mostly pointed to the > security survey draft, I gave this draft

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 6:26 AM Fernando Gont wrote: > > On 07/25/2018 05:34 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:05 AM Tommy Pauly wrote: > >> > >> Yes, I'm inclined to agree—I think that having a unique address per > >> connection s

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:48 AM Kyle Rose wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Christopher Wood > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:05 AM Tommy Pauly wrote: >> > >> > Yes, I'm inclined to agree—I think that having a unique address per &

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

cast traffic draining battery, cache space/maintenance) if used by > > default on very short live connections > > > > Just a thought > > > > -éric > > > > On 25/07/2018, 12:02, "Taps on behalf of Tom Jones" > on behalf of t...@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:21 PM Tommy Pauly wrote: > > Picking this thread up again, I would like to see us incorporate IPv6 address > selection into a post-sockets API model. > > Here's a straw man proposal of how we can expose this via the TAPS Interface: > > - A new property for Local Address

Re: [Taps] Comments on draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-01

Hi Michael, Many thanks for reading the document and taking time to provide comments! They are greatly appreciated. I've filed #33 ( https://github.com/mami-project/draft-pauly-transport-security/issues/33) to address them. Please see inline below for responses. Best, Chris > The main problem

Re: [Taps] comments on draft-pauly-taps-transport-security-02.txt

On Mar 18, 2018, 11:42 AM +, Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Thanks, Chris. One reply inline. > --aaron > On 18 Mar 2018, at 11:36, Christopher Wood wrote: > > Hi Aarron, > > > > Thanks for the feedback. Please see inline for responses. > >

Re: [Taps] comments on draft-pauly-taps-transport-security-02.txt

Hi Aarron, Thanks for the feedback. Please see inline for responses. Best, Chris On Mar 17, 2018, 2:53 PM +, Aaron Falk , wrote: > A few comments on the draft below. > --aaron > Introduction (sec 1): > I think it’s missing a statement describing why you chose this set

Re: [Taps] Draft agenda for TAPS session at IETF101

Thanks! On Mar 13, 2018, 8:56 AM -0700, Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hey Chris- > I moved up your talk to the start of the session: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-taps > --aaron > On 12 Mar 2018, at 10:53, Christopher Woo

Re: [Taps] Draft agenda for TAPS session at IETF101

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Wood > > <christopherwoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Zahed, Aaron, > > > > > > Would it be possible to move the talk for > > > draft-pauly-taps-transport-security to the start of Wednesday's > > >

Re: [Taps] Draft agenda for TAPS session at IETF101

Hi Zahed, Aaron, Would it be possible to move the talk for draft-pauly-taps-transport-security to the start of Wednesday's meeting? There are talks in the tail end of the conflicting TLS session that I need to attend. Thanks, Chris On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Anna Brunstrom

Re: [Taps] [TAPS] Call for agenda items

+1 to the reduction in time for the security survey. I think we ought to spend more time on the big three. Best, Chris On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Anna Brunstrom wrote: > > Hi Zahed, Aaron, all,

Re: [Taps] Call for agenda items

Hi Zahed, Aaron, We published an update to the transport security survey in January, and will likely rev it again before Monday:    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-taps-transport-security/ If possible, I’d like a short slot to go over updates, revisit goals as they pertain to our

Re: [Taps] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on charter-ietf-taps-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Hi Spencer, On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > Dear TAPsters, > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: >> >> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-taps-01-00:

Re: [Taps] TAPS Documents for Charter Item 3

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > > > On Jan 11, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Michael Welzl wrote: > > Hi Tommy, > > A few answers below: > > On Jan 10, 2018, at 6:11 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > > Hello TAPS, > > In Singapore,

Re: [Taps] Draft TAPS minutes

IIRC the person marked as ? in the draft-tiesel-taps-socketintents-01 slot was Nacho Solis. Best, Chris On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:10 AM Aaron Falk wrote: > We’re overdue for filing the minutes from our Singapore meeting. Please > give the (very good) notes by Kyle & Tale

Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-minset-00.txt

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > TLS: > > We can discuss in the group, but I think that security can stay a separate > document for now. You wouldn't "fall back" to TLS—TLS is just something you > can use underneath the TAPS API, and you either have security