Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello MaXxX! On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 2:03:22 AM you wrote: It was reported in RC/5. I didn't download 1.53 release yet, but I also didn't see the list of changes from RC/5 to 1.53 release. This bug has never appeared with me, anyway, but

Re: Address book ADD

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Krzysztof, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 8:37:17 AM you wrote: PP not over here .. neither new message window nor reply window. PP did you had a name with ',' (comma) inside in the to field when you PP tried it? KK It was: String1 String2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is the buggy point.

Re: Writing in one account, sending from another - was - Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dwight! On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 9:40:26 AM you wrote: I'm not sure I understand what you are suggesting when you say setup the SMTP server, and perhaps I don't understand what the %from macro would do, but if there is some way to

Re:  Copy/paste of filters works on SELECTED, not RIGHT-CLICKED filter

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello David, On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 at 10:58:48 PM you wrote: DvZ 1. Open the filters DvZ 2. Select some filter DvZ 3. Press the copy button (not right-click!) DvZ 4. It's the first filter that gets copied, not the selected one. (I DvZmean the first one from the top) cannot confirm that

Re: copy/paste of filter rules flaw

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Patrick, On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 at 8:43:26 PM you wrote: PE i'm administrating some unix boxes and want to filter the mail to PE the root of the one box exactly like the mail to the other root, PE so i need the same folder structure in both accounts. I don't think it's TB!s work to

Re[2]: copy/paste of filter rules flaw

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 3:41:10 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: 'Twas Brillig, and the slithey toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe; all mimsy were the borogoves, and the mome raths outgrabe. I thought this was an English list g -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828

Re[2]: Writing in one account,sending from another - was - Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 3:46:22 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote: Sounds exactly like you need the Options/Active account selection. I'm not finding it. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.53 on Windows

Re: Address book ADD

2001-06-13 Thread Graham Foster
Hello Peter / Krzysztof That is the buggy point. String1 String2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] works correctly. The problem occurs when a comma is in the username-part :-( Whatever.. its fixed in the released version :-) regards, Graham Using The Bat! 1.53 under Windows NT 4.0 (Build 1381,

Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dierk, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 9:47:44 AM you wrote: DH Ever worked with MS Word? yes DH does exactly the same. nope ... If I save a word-document via Ctrl+S and it was never saved before, I get asked for a fielname, OK. If I use Ctrl+S again, it simply saves the document. If

Re: Address book ADD

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Graham, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 11:09:15 AM you wrote: GF Whatever.. its fixed in the released version :-) Ye :-) confirmed :-) downloaded 1.53 final in this moment, instantly installed, tested, feeling GREAT :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, On 13 June 2001 at 09:45:54 +0200 (which was 08:45 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points: Correct. DH OK, I am not a native speaker but quite an accomplished linguist DH (at least I have a

Re: Writing in one account, sending from another - was - Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dwight, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 11:05:53 AM you wrote: Sounds exactly like you need the Options/Active account selection. DAC I'm not finding it. when creating new mail :-) I thing they suppose you to create 2,3 or 4 account, with different SMTP-Servers (as you need) and when

OT: signature cookie [was: Re: copy/paste of filter rules flaw]

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dwight, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 11:00:35 AM you wrote: 'Twas Brillig, and the slithey toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe; all mimsy were the borogoves, and the mome raths outgrabe. DAC I thought this was an English list g Thought too ... Maybe I should tell I don't

Re:  Copy/paste of filters works on SELECTED, not RIGHT-CLICKED filter

2001-06-13 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 10:46:39 +0200, Peter Palmreuther [PP] wrote concerning 'Copy/paste of filters works on SELECTED, not RIGHT-CLICKED filter': DvZ 1. Open the filters DvZ 2. Select some filter DvZ 3. Press the copy button

Re[2]: Writing in one account, sending from another - was - Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Screwyluie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 DAC With Eudora at the office, I have been able to use DAC authentication and send from roadrunner, which is the account most of DAC my mailing lists now require, but I haven't ever been able to get TB! DAC to do that. perhaps if you elaborate on

Re[2]: Writing in one account,sending from another - was - Re: 1.53 Release - too fast again!!

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 4:33:45 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: Sounds exactly like you need the Options/Active account selection. DAC I'm not finding it. when creating new mail :-) Too many places to look for different menus g. The active account selection appears to work with a new

Re:   Copy/paste of filters works on SELECTED, not RIGHT-CLICKED filter

2001-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello David, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 11:35:40 AM you wrote: DvZ No you're right. When you press copy, TB! copies it to the end of the DvZ list. I thought it would copy it to the clipboard, like with the right DvZ mouse button copy. Now I think what's the use of it? Quiet simple :-) the

Re: Updated 1.53 version - 1.53bis

2001-06-13 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marek, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 21:12:28 +0200 (CEST), Marek Mikus [MM] wrote concerning 'Updated 1.53 version - 1.53bis': MM new version is uploaded now, here are changes from readme: Does anybody now where 'bis' stands for? - --

Bug in 1.53bis - autosave message without TO field

2001-06-13 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, When user wants to store message to Outbox without TO field entered, TB display warning - You cannot leave TO: field blank. But, when You don't enter TO field, Autosave automatically save message and You hit Esc, TB will close Editor window with empty TO field. -- Bye, Marek

Re: RFC -822 headers view option is obsolete IMO

2001-06-13 Thread Thomas F
Hello MaXxX, On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:43:06 +0200GMT (14/06/2001, 03:43 +0800GMT), MaXxX wrote: Since we can now view the source of the messages by pressing F9, don't you think that View-RFC-822 headers menu entry (and maybe the part of the code that is attached to it) should be taken out?

Re:  Updated 1.53 version - 1.53bis

2001-06-13 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 01:15:44 +0200GMT (14/06/2001, 07:15 +0800GMT), David van Zuijlekom wrote: DvZ Does anybody now where 'bis' stands for? It's another way of counting the second. They could have called it 1.53a but decided this time to use another method. Why not? shrug --

Re[2]:  Updated 1.53 version - 1.53bis

2001-06-13 Thread -=/ Cees /=-
Hallo Thomas, Op een donderdag 14 juni 2001 om 6:19:49 schreef jij over  Updated 1.53 version - 1.53bis: DvZ Does anybody now where 'bis' stands for? TF It's another way of counting the second. They could have called it TF 1.53a but decided this time to use another method. Why not? shrug it

Re: RFC -822 headers view option is obsolete IMO

2001-06-13 Thread Ulrich Peters
Hello Silviu, SC Since we can now view the source of the messages by pressing F9, SC don't you think that View-RFC-822 headers menu entry (and maybe SC the part of the code that is attached to it) should be taken SC out? SC After all F9 is quicker then Ctrl+Shift+K and shows the same SC thing,