Re: Heeelp Me pls ! :-(

2002-01-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Stefano, On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:35:16 +0100GMT (09/01/2002, 15:35 +0800GMT), Stefano Zamprogno wrote: SZ> I'm going crazy :-( >>From about 4days, TB is unusable, it stay 5 minutes to download SZ> 30kbyte of mail ! (i have ADSL !!!) , The same happened to me last month with cable. It turned

Heeelp Me pls ! :-(

2002-01-08 Thread Stefano Zamprogno
Hi, I'm going crazy :-( >From about 4days, TB is unusable, it stay 5 minutes to download 30kbyte of mail ! (i have ADSL !!!) , exporting mail is impossible due to time it stay idle (i mean it take 40sec for a single message to export !!!) ecc... Another thing is, if i click on abort or delete ta

Send-, Put in Outbox-Button don't work

2002-01-08 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear readers from 'TB!beta List', I have noticed that sometimes TB! does not let me use these Send functions: - Send Button - Put in Outbox Button - Ctrl-RET (Send) - Shift-F2 (in Outbox) My current work around is: - Quit TB! and restart - Save Draft (Alt-F2) or Button This ha

"this week" (was: The Bat! - bug report)

2002-01-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Per, On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:36:29 +0100GMT (09/01/2002, 04:36 +0800GMT), Per Goetterup wrote: PG>>> Any idea when 'current week' will change from meaning 'since monday' to 'last PG>>> 7 days'? :-) >> I'm quite content with the current week starting on Monday. :o) PG> Well, so am I but I l

Re: Long HTML display times

2002-01-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Dwight, On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:10:47 -0600GMT (09/01/2002, 04:10 +0800GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC> I have 1.54/Abacus, which I am told is beta 16, set up on a 98SE DAC> desktop here at the office. I just opened it and looked at a bunch of DAC> html messages. Each displayed faster than

Message splitting

2002-01-08 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
Hello all! Message splitting does not functioning in TB! 1.54/beta25. Can anybody confirm this bug? -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/25 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A) -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] -- __

POP3 with SSL: Strange?

2002-01-08 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there beta-testers :) I've found a little quirk today. While trying to fetch my mails from a POP3 server that (at least tells it[1]) supports SSL, I get this: +08.01.2002, 17:02:06: FETCH - connected to POP3 server !08.01.2002, 17:02:06: FETCH - Server reports error. The response is: OK STLS

Re[2]: Untidy keyboard shortcuts...

2002-01-08 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour Jacek, Mardi, le 8 janvier 2002 à 23h32 [GMT +0100] (ce qui correspond à 23h32 ici où j'habite), Jacek Wojaczynski =[JW] a écrit à Graham Foster : JW> My suggestion is: JW> F5 -> Reply using "Reply-To" header + quoting JW>ALL JW> Does it sound more natural? OK, but wh

Re: Untidy keyboard shortcuts...

2002-01-08 Thread Jacek Wojaczynski
On 8 Jan 2002 Graham Foster wrote: > F5 (undocumented) is New message (Also Cntrl N) My suggestion is: If F5 is undocumented - resign from F5... Ctrl-N should be fine... And now... here it goes: F5 -> Reply using "Reply-To" header + quoting ALL Ctrl-F5 -> Reply to "Sender"/"To" ign

Re[4]: The Bat! - bug report

2002-01-08 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Boris, 8 Jan 2002, 22:43:05, you wrote: > Hello, > 8 Jan 2002, 2:15:40 PM, Per Goetterup wrote: PG ... $Known$ ... >>> It's not a bug. And it has been discussed very deeply before. PG>> I've not seen this discussion, having jumped into the BETA forum fairly PG>> recently. Sorry f

Re[3]: The Bat! - bug report

2002-01-08 Thread Boris Golberg
Hello, 8 Jan 2002, 2:15:40 PM, Per Goetterup wrote: PG>>> ... $Known$ ... >> It's not a bug. And it has been discussed very deeply before. PG> I've not seen this discussion, having jumped into the BETA forum fairly PG> recently. Sorry for reporting in vain... PG> I found a few references in

Re: Changing accounts on response ignores S/MIME settings

2002-01-08 Thread Carsten Thönges
Hi Alastair, AS> Suppose a message is received on account A, which has S/MIME switched AS> off. The response's active account is switched to account B (Options | AS> Active account | B), which has S/MIME signing switched on by default AS> (Account | Properties | Options | Enable S/MIME and ... |

Re[2]: The Bat! - bug report

2002-01-08 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Peter, 8 Jan 2002, 21:21:44, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:30:56 +0100GMT (which was 14:30 +0100GMT where I live), > Per Goetterup thought about "The Bat! - bug report" and wrote: PG>> Any idea when 'current week' will change from m

Re: The Bat! - bug report

2002-01-08 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:30:56 +0100GMT (which was 14:30 +0100GMT where I live), Per Goetterup thought about "The Bat! - bug report" and wrote: PG> Any idea when 'current week' will change from meaning 'since monday' to 'last PG> 7 days'? :-) Hi Per,

Re[2]: The Bat! - bug report

2002-01-08 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Boris, 8 Jan 2002, 20:12:04, you wrote: > Hello, > 8 Jan 2002, 7:01:08 AM, Per Goetterup wrote: PG>> ... $Known$ ... > It's not a bug. And it has been discussed very deeply before. I've not seen this discussion, having jumped into the BETA forum fairly recently. Sorry for reporting i

Re[2]: hide items .... in properities of group

2002-01-08 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour MaXxX, Mardi, le 8 janvier 2002 à 19h50 [GMT +0100] (ce qui correspond à 19h50 ici où j'habite), MaXxX =[M] a écrit à Krzysztof Kudlacik : >> F8 <> select any group of addresses <> alt+enter => there is option >> "hide items if not explicitly selected". What is it for? ;-< M> The se

Changing accounts on response ignores S/MIME settings

2002-01-08 Thread Alastair Scott
Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 Beta/25 Serial Number 1E7B0E3E under Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600 and would like to report a bug The bug description: An interesting one :) Suppose a message is received on account A, which has S/MIME switched off. The response