Hello Graham,
On Monday, June 9, 2003 at 4:26:52 PM you wrote (at least in part):
FG Now I've figured out my S/MIME setup problem, I've had a go a t the
FG self certification issue. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] address does not
FG exist!
John Not confirmed, I just completed the process last night
Hello Bill,
On Monday, June 9, 2003 at 11:18:13 PM you wrote (at least in part):
ST [-] %SUBJECT=... bug
NACK. Seems still to strip 'Re.' (as regular expression).
BM The old syntax is working fine here.
I've just double checked after your comment and in fact the old _and_
new syntax works.
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003 Mark Partous wrote:
BTW: did you see the message in which someone let us know you can now right
click in the message text then selecting Reply to All quoting selected
text? Nice!
It would be really nice if you could use it with keyboard...
regards,
--
Hi, Allie.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:56:16 -0500 GMT your local time, which was
Monday, June 09, 2003, 5:56 PM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
Keith Russell, [KR] wrote:
KR I'm running beta 9, but for some time now, a large number of message
KR in this list display like this. This one appears to be in
Dear beta testers,
can anyone confirm this? With the new beta 10, PGP/MIME works very
well while selecting Privacy/Sign when completed, but if you want to
Encrypt when completed or both encrypt and sign when completed, it
does not work. Does not work means that PGP asks for the passphrase
(when
Hello Ralph, hello The Bat! - Betalist,
* Ralph Bednarski wrote:
When leaving The Bat! beta 10 there will be an error: GPF in
thebat.exe.
Same problem here.
--
cheers
Frank
[TheBat! (1.63 Beta/10)] [Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 3]
[Hamster Version: 2.0.2.1] [powered by Intel
Hi Johannes,
@10-Jun-2003, 05:38+0200 (04:38 UK time) Johannes Posel [JP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Stefan:
Some work is still required for built-in PGP 5-8 support, but I
guess we are getting close :-)
JP Indeed, it's pretty much the way it should be, at least together
JP with PGP 8.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Keith,
@10-Jun-2003, 02:22-0600 (09:22 UK time) Keith Russell [KR] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie:
It would seem that you're having problems with base64 encoded
messages.
Precisely.
How is this one?
KR As you can see, it's fine.
In beta 9 and 10 I see new bahavioru of forwarding message. Turn on RFC 822
headers in message panel and forward it - in forward message there will be
NO RFC 822 headers. No matter: mime or standard forward. Question: is it bug
or feature?
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, June 10, 2003
6:31:04 AM (GMT -05:00)
RE: 1.63 Beta/10
Greetings Thomas,
On Monday, June 9, 2003, 5:02:38 PM, you wrote:
When leaving The Bat! beta 10 there will be an error: GPF in thebat.exe.
TM Not confirmed. Windows XP SP1
Bonjour,
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:46:27 +0200, Frank Dzicher wrote:
FD Hello Ralph, hello The Bat! - Betalist,
FD * Ralph Bednarski wrote:
When leaving The Bat! beta 10 there will be an error: GPF in
thebat.exe.
FD Same problem here.
Not confirmed here (until now)
A bientôt,
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 12:21, Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:
In beta 9 and 10 I see new bahavioru of forwarding message. Turn on
RFC 822 headers in message panel and forward it - in forward message
there will be NO RFC 822 headers. No matter: mime or standard forward.
Question: is it bug or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 20:46, Greg Strong wrote:
GS Last night I read part I of the RegEx
GS tutorial.
Is it a book, URL or other?
A URL would be nice :)
- --
Tony.
Defender 110. SuSE
Hi,
That's the reason why I changed to beta 7 again.
Fred
On 10-6-2003 Costas wrote
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C Hello Daniel,
C Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 5:59:05 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
The common denominator to the problem seems to be the AVG plugin(not
all versions though). I
Hello JRS2!
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003 at 9:44:36 PM you wrote:
Can anyone out there give me guidance?
Well, the only way to get a message forwarded without any changes -
except those that show that it is a forwarded message - is to MIME
forward it. That, BTW, was the ominously Alternative
Hi Greg,
@10-Jun-2003, 14:46-0500 (20:46 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBBETA:
GS Any ideals why?
Yes. The new version is wrong and I corrected it myself last night:
GS I'm NO RegEx expert. All of my QTs and templates are the result
GS of help from RegEx experts.
Hi Fred,
@10-Jun-2003, 22:03+0200 (21:03 UK time) Fred van Veen [FvV] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said::
The common denominator to the problem seems to be the AVG
plugin(not all versions though).
... snip
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the
)On Tue 10-Jun-03 3:46pm-0400, Greg Strong wrote:
,- [ Initials QT ]
| %SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)(\w).*?([EMAIL PROTECTED](\w).*?)?([EMAIL
PROTECTED](\w).*?)?$%-
| %REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%QINCLUDE('Full Name')%-
| %SUBPATT(1)%SUBPATT(3)%SUBPATT(5)
`-
I started reading this but got stuck.
Hi Bill,
@10-Jun-2003, 17:33-0400 (22:33 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Greg:
BM So, with new notation, shouldn't it be `%QInclude(Full Name)`?
Certainly not. It has already been explicitly stated that quotes are
required inside the brackets if the parameter
Hello TB Fans,
somebody get this to work, i am going crazy...normaly it has following
result:
Attachments / Dateianlagen:
---
[1] file1.jpg
[2] file2.jpg
[3] file3.jpg
QT1 / Name: ATN
%IF:%-
%-%SETPATTREGEXP='^\s*(keine|none)\s*\Z'%-
%-%REGEXPMATCH='%ATTACHMENTS'=%-
Hi TB Beta list members,
Looks like Reply to sender is not working right in the new beta.
The address book template for the default reply to address is
kicking in and the specific reply address is being ignored. Very
strange. Even a Reply to all is not getting to the author address
when replying
Hallo Marck,
Op een dinsdag 10 juni 2003 om 23:53:02 schreef jij over ly to Sender broken:
MDP Hi TB Beta list members,
MDP Looks like Reply to sender is not working right in the new beta.
MDP The address book template for the default reply to address is
MDP kicking in and the specific reply
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, at 22:22:37 GMT +0100 (6/10/2003, 4:22 PM -0600 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MDP This one works.
MDP ,--/ My standard 'q' QT \-- |
MDP %IF:%QINCLUDE(ISBAT):%QUOTESTYLE='=%Qinclude(Initials)'%- |
MDP %QINCLUDE(w) `-8-
If I'm
Gi'day Tony,
It is established that on Wednesday, 11 June 2003, at 20:55:03[GMT
+0100](which was 5:55 AM where I live) you wrote:
TB Is it a book, URL or other?
TB A URL would be nice :)
http://www.regenechsen.de/regex_en/regex_1_en.html is another site. This
one also has a downloadable
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 18:48:44 [UTC-0300] (Tuesday, June 10, 2003
23:48 my local time) Thomas Martin wrote:
somebody get this to work, i am going crazy...normaly it has following
result:
Attachments / Dateianlagen:
Your problems are caused by %COMMENT macro in new betas. Try
Hi,
Im using only text based formatting but one place i send alot of
email to is a webbased bbs
Actually its webboard by oreily and associates
anyway my emails are being changed to some sort of hyroglyphics that
need a decoder ring to decipher.
Here is how they are showing up
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, at 23:47:21 GMT +0100 (6/10/2003, 5:47 PM -0600 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GS If I'm understanding this correctly you want me to create a Quick
GS template with a handle of 'q', correct?
MDP Not at all. You already have a QT. You're using
27 matches
Mail list logo
