Hello Paul,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 10:12:54 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
GS>> IMHO the above is Stefan asking which is why the discussion exists.
PC> good point, I'll go back to trying to figure out what to do with these
PC> virtual folders ;) I can't comment on them, because I haven't figured
PC>
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC> good point, I'll go back to trying to figure out what to do with
PC> these virtual folders ;) I can't comment on them, because I
PC> haven't figured out a good way to use them. Since I already use
PC> the ticker with folders as a column, sort all my messages by
PC>
Syp, [S] wrote:
S> When I try to click on the uppermost message on the message list, I
S> often accidentally click on the columns instead, messing up the
S> sorting. So you're not alone in this, I support the idea. Care to
S> put it on the wishlist?
Ok. Will do.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator
Hello Greg,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 10:43:43 AM, you wrote:
GS> ,- [ Per Stefan in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
GS> | So, this Beta is about new Virtual Folders concept. Your
GS> | suggestions/thoughts/reports are welcome.
GS> `-
GS> IMHO the above is Stefan asking which is why the discussion
Hello Paul,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 9:34:21 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
PC> how do I know if I want it when I can't figure out how it works, or what
PC> I am supposed to do with it?
PC> before it even got fully implemented it was already under deep
PC> discussion to change it, or say it wasn't supp
Hello Allie,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 9:38:51 AM, you wrote:
AM> This very much eclipses my feeling on this. The Hybrid concept is
AM> really a tedious one to make work and to implement without creating
AM> confusion and problems for all except those who want it. :) Keep it as
AM> simple as possibl
Hello Allie and all,
You wrote on 2004.04.04., 15:48:
Allie> I don't know about everyone else, but I'm quite sure I'm not
Allie> alone on this; but it's not all the time, or even nearly all
Allie> the time, that when I make changes to a message list viewing
Allie> that I wish to store it for fur
Marco Lackovic, [ML] wrote:
ML> Well, if they would implement such function, you are perfectly
ML> right. Then I would agree to completely drop the normal folders.
I actually wish this were really possible.
I use this concept with PowerMarks and Opera's M2 works in this way.
It's great when you
Hi all,
It's getting tiring for me when I wish to make an adjustment to a
folder view and at the same time having to set things back to the way
they were before since any adjustment you make is stored without my
being able to override this.
Now that TB! has implemented being able to create specif
Marco Lackovic, [ML] wrote:
ML> The discussion, which has become very complicated and tedious to
ML> follow, so far has found patches to patches in the attempt to
ML> implement "hybrid" VFs at all costs.
This very much eclipses my feeling on this. The Hybrid concept is
really a tedious one to mak
Hello Marco,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 8:09:25 AM, you wrote:
ML>Not only I agree with Greg and Allie and MAU that mixing real with
ML> virtual messages isn't a good idea, I do believe it does not make any
ML> sense. The discussion, which has become very complicated and tedious
ML> to follow, so
Hi everybody!
Not only I agree with Greg and Allie and MAU that mixing real with
virtual messages isn't a good idea, I do believe it does not make any
sense. The discussion, which has become very complicated and tedious
to follow, so far has found patches to patches in the attempt to
implement
Hi everybody!
The 3.4.2004 at 15.06 Patrick wrote:
PE> make a VF "send or received in 2003" export all messages which are
PE> in this VF (such a function should be provided) and physically
PE> delete them.
Well, if they would implement such function, you are perfectly right.
Then I would agree to
Hi everybody!
The 30.3.2004 at 23.55 Januk wrote:
JA> I can see the benefit. I keep communication with family in
JA> individual folders for each person, but often a message or thread
JA> involves multiple people. I only really want one copy of the
JA> message, but it would be nice to see it in ea
Januk Aggarwal, [JA] wrote:
JA> Whereas the alternative is straight-forward. You just drag and
JA> drop a message, and you're done. The message only exists in one
JA> place on your HD, in the "VF" message base.
I agree with Greg that mixing real with virtual messages isn't a good
idea. Virtual fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I send out a monthly Newsletter in PDF format to 50 people using a mass
mailing QT but, although the PDF file was received by everyone, it shows
up as "PDF 0 bytes" in the attachment frame to the messages. A Word
document sent at the same time
16 matches
Mail list logo
