Re: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Avi Yashar
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:41:26 +0200, Avi Yashar wrote: Is it just me. When I receive a message from someone who has apostrophes in her/his name, then the Quote Name Limit feature goes bonkers. Well, here I am talking to myself again. But I guess that is no less healthy than communing with dead

Re[2]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/22/2005 11:27 AM Was it always like this? Shouldn't you be using the latest beta 3.0.2.10? -- Paul Van Noord TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k 5.00.2195 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: Re[2]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Avi Yashar
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:30:18 -0500, Paul Van Noord wrote: Was it always like this? Shouldn't you be using the latest beta 3.0.2.10? Well, Paul, I really wouldn't know. Does it make any difference in respect to my question? You apparently have 3.0.2.10 - do you see this same problem in that

Re: Re[2]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Avi Yashar
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:04:20 +0200, Avi Yashar wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:30:18 -0500, Paul Van Noord wrote: Was it always like this? Shouldn't you be using the latest beta 3.0.2.10? Well, Paul, I really wouldn't know. Does it make any difference in respect to my question? You

Re[4]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/22/2005 6:18 PM Perhaps Ritlabs also missed the thread about the 3.0.2.10 release. I got mine at: http://www.softpedia.com/get/Others/Signatures-Updates/The-Bat.shtml -- Paul Van Noord TB beta 3.0.2.10 on Win2k 5.00.2195 Current

Re[4]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/22/2005 6:21 PM I fail to see why you raised this point without even making an attempt to confirm or contradict my experience in 3.0.2.8. It is inappropriate to report problems on anything other than the latest release - for obvious reasons. So, how did you find the current beta? -- Paul

Re[2]: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

2005-01-22 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Max, on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:41:23 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote: MM Is the sig delimiter now OK? MM X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.10) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 ??? -- Regards, Peter Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.2.10 (OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2)

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

2005-01-22 Thread Mic Cullen
At 01:18 [GMT+0100] on Sunday January 23 (actual time - 8:18am on Sunday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Peter Hello Max, Peter on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:41:23 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote: MM Is the sig delimiter now OK? MM X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.10) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091

Re: Re[4]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Avi Yashar
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:25:14 -0500, Paul Van Noord wrote: I fail to see why you raised this point without even making an attempt to confirm or contradict my experience in 3.0.2.8. It is inappropriate to report problems on anything other than the latest release - for obvious reasons. Paul,

Re[6]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/22/2005 8:28 PM So, pardon me, but I think it would have been more constructive if you had just confirmed or denied my bug report for 3.0.2.10 on your operating system (which is different from mine). You are always entitled to your opinion, and...so am I. I disagree with you on your

Re: Re[6]: Bug in Quote Name Limit?

2005-01-22 Thread Avi Yashar
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:37:18 -0500, Paul Van Noord wrote: So, pardon me, but I think it would have been more constructive if you had just confirmed or denied my bug report for 3.0.2.10 on your operating system (which is different from mine). You are always entitled to your opinion, and...so