Re: Lycos mail plugin....

On 7/11/05, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > On Monday, 11 July 2005 at 07:55 AM, Jay Walker wrote: > > >> Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP... > > > > You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but "HTTP/IMAP" even > > for free. So what is "HTTP/IMAP"? > > Just a webinterfa

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

On Monday, 11 July 2005 at 07:55 AM, Jay Walker wrote: >> Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP... > > You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but "HTTP/IMAP" even > for free. So what is "HTTP/IMAP"? Just a webinterface? -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de ___

Re: Re[2]: Lycos mail plugin....

On 7/11/05, Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JW> > http://secure.mail.lycos.co.uk/services/content/advdetail.jsp?advid=advdetails&advsvc=advcompare > > Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP... You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but "HTTP/IMAP" even for

Re[2]: Lycos mail plugin....

Hi Jay, In reply to : JW> On 7/10/05, Liz wrote: JW> As far as I can tell, you don't even get POP3 access - in other words, JW> the ability to use TB - unless you pay for it. Even if you pay, there JW> does not seem to be any option for IMAP. JW> http://secure.mail.lyco

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

On 7/10/05, Liz wrote: > hehehe > > http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php > > You get to "sing up"! Another "I scratch your back - you scratch my back" promotion deal. Anything for money. It could just as easily have been "sin up". As far as I can tell, you don't even get POP3

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

Hi Alexander NVP>>> To achieve best results - OK, any results at all - you'll need all the NVP>>> following macros. >> How do you insert new macros into TB! > I'd say that Natasha meant Quick Templates. Oops! I did indeed. Thanks for spotting that one. Also, a minor modification to one of the

Re: Test

Hello Wayne, On Sunday, July 10, 2005, at 4:39:11 PM, you wrote re: Test: WH> Hello tbbeta, Sorry, I didn't mean to actually send this test. I was just configuring The Bat! and was testing how new messages would look. -- Cheers! Wayne Howard Using The Bat! version: 3.5.36 Directory Opus 8: "T

Re: Message List not showing fully

On Sunday, July 10, 2005 at 3:40:28 PM [GMT -0500], Allie Martin wrote: > I no longer have the message in my tbbeta folder and therefore can't > comment. I also can't search for messages by msgid on the archives > pages. Alexander, Thanks for sending the message off-list. This is very

Re: Test

On Sunday, 10 July 2005 at 10:39 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: > Hello tbbeta, Hi Wayne, everything fine so far? ;-) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/theb

Re: Message List not showing fully

On Sunday, July 10, 2005 at 10:36:42 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > That sounds like the bug I was describing in > msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Maybe its related? I no longer have the message in my tbbeta folder and therefore can't comment. I also can't search for messages by

Test

Hello tbbeta, -- Cheers! Wayne Howard Using The Bat! version: 3.5.36 Directory Opus 8: "The Explorer replacement and File Management solution for Windows" See the tutorial: "Getting to know Directory Opus": www.pretentiousname.com/opus/index.html#introduction _

Re[2]: IMAP: Server side outbox

On 10 July 2005 at 15:21, Allie wrote: >> Each time the message draft is to be auto-saved while composing, I get >> the following error: >> - !9/7/2005, 14:06:42: IMAP - 1: Could not compose the message for >> uploading Please verify the amount of free disk space Integrity checking >> of the fold

Lycos mail plugin....

hehehe http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php You get to "sing up"! -- Best regards, Liz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Website: http://www.xcalibur.co.uk Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silve

Re: how to kill a bat

On 10/07/2005 09:44, Goncalo Farias wrote... Why is TB! so sluggish with big attachments? Anyone has comparable experiences with other e-mail clients? I just sent/received a 32M attachment with Thunderbird. I used POP to POP, IMAP to POP and POP to IMAP. Thunderbird works fine, processin

Re: Message List not showing fully

Hello Allie Martin & everyone else, on 10-Jul-2005 at 16:16 you (Allie Martin) wrote: > The absence of the scroll-bar makes it very difficult to fix the problem > too. That sounds like the bug I was describing in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe its related? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://w

Re: Message List not showing fully

Hallo Roelof, On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:46:47 +0200GMT (10-7-2005, 16:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO> reading Cees' message about his cat pictures tbot and from the subject That should read on tbot -- Groetjes, Roelof This program must die under Micros

Re: Message List not showing fully

Hallo Allie, On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:16:28 -0500GMT (10-7-2005, 16:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AM> The list columns can easily hold within the space provided, and yet the AM> subject column is not in full view. That's odd, that's almost the same as I had, about an hour ago. I was reading

Re[2]: how to kill a bat

In reply to : ASK> Hello Ben Allen & everyone else, ASK> on 10-Jul-2005 at 10:16 you (Ben Allen) wrote: >> So i just sent a 10 meg one really quickly instead ASK> You can enable the SMTP logging (in the "protocol.ini" file in ASK> the mail dir of the account) - maybe

Re: IMAP: Server side outbox

On Saturday, July 09, 2005 at 2:10:24 PM [GMT -0500], Allie Martin wrote: > Each time the message draft is to be auto-saved while composing, I get > the following error: > - !9/7/2005, 14:06:42: IMAP - 1: Could not compose the message for > uploading Please verify the amount of free disk space In

Message List not showing fully

Hi all, The capture better shows what I'd otherwise have difficulty explaining. http://pics.aimlink.name/weird.png The list columns can easily hold within the space provided, and yet the subject column is not in full view. The absence of the scroll-bar makes it very difficult to fix the proble

Re[2]: how to kill a bat

7/10/2005 8:31 AM Hi Roelof, On 7/10/2005 Roelof Otten wrote: BA>> try adding a 20meg attachment that'll slow the bat up BA>> something badly. RO> As I'm writing this message, I'm getting my 47 MB (yes, that is how RO> big a 33 MB attachment gets on an almost empty message) message back

Re: how to kill a bat

Hallo Roelof, On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:22:33 +0200GMT (10-7-2005, 14:22 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO> It takes TB almost 3 seconds to display the message in the preview, As an add-on. It took three seconds too to delete (move to trash) it. -- Groetjes, Roelof I can please only one person

Re: how to kill a bat

Hallo Ben, On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:11:38 +0100GMT (8-7-2005, 23:11 +0200, where I live), you wrote: BA> try adding a 20meg attachment that'll slow the bat up BA> something badly. Just picked a 33 MB attachment and started to send it. Took TB quite some time, maybe a minute to act upon the star

Re: how to kill a bat

Hello Ben Allen & everyone else, on 10-Jul-2005 at 10:16 you (Ben Allen) wrote: > So i just sent a 10 meg one really quickly instead You can enable the SMTP logging (in the "protocol.ini" file in the mail dir of the account) - maybe your provider returns status information for the server limits

Re[2]: how to kill a bat

Howdy Alexander, Sunday, July 10, 2005, 8:56:01 AM, Alexander wrotened: ASK> Hello Ben Allen & everyone else, ASK> on 08-Jul-2005 at 23:11 you (Ben Allen) wrote: >> try adding a 20meg attachment that'll slow the bat up something >> badly. ASK> Thats the punishment for having the idea of se

Re: how to kill a bat

Hello Ben Allen & everyone else, on 08-Jul-2005 at 23:11 you (Ben Allen) wrote: > try adding a 20meg attachment that'll slow the bat up something > badly. Thats the punishment for having the idea of sending a 20meg file via email, of course. :-D -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neur

how to kill a bat

Howdy Flying Rodent fans, try adding a 20meg attachment that'll slow the bat up something badly. -- Have Fun, |> |> |>en is |\ohop [EMAIL PROTECTED] crashing The Bat! v3.51 falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.70

Re: Reply to address

Howdy Marck, Saturday, July 9, 2005, 10:16:23 AM, Marck wrotened: MDP> Hi TB Beta list members, MDP> Reply to sender and "reply to this address" is not working at all for MDP> me. Is anyone else seeing this? Nopers MDP> If I pick a message from a mailing list and ask to reply to sender, I MDP