Hello Neal,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 you wrote in
NL> Still won't use it. I never use Inbox - Known but have been staring at
NL> it for years. Just a matter of user choice.
Me neither and choice is the most important thing. It seems that this
request for a Draft folder (which I've already supported)
Hello Ian,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 you wrote in
IAW> The first thing is to either provide an alert or a Draft folder where
IAW> messages can be copied or moved AND that messages there can be further
IAW> edited.
I was worried about that with the present version so I changed my Icon
file so that, wh
Hello, folks!
I don't know, if it has been already mentioned here.
If the cursor is in the Subject field, it does not jump into the
message body by typing the tab key.
Any confirmations?
--
Cheers!
VA - using The Bat! 3.63.09 (Beta) (Pro) on Windows XP Service Pack 2.
I
12/14/2005 6:12 AM
Hi Vili,
On 12/13/2005 Vili wrote:
V> Ok, then I should campaign for a "Hungarian", "Russian", etc folder...
V> Because I have different emailing habits..(?)
Draft messages are a part of everyone's use. Sorry you do not
understand that.
V> Why do you MIX the waiting to send
Hello, folks!
If the cursor is in To:, CC:, Subject: etc. fields, Context menu
(right-click) does not work.
Confirmations?
--
Cheers!
VA - using The Bat! 3.63.09 (Beta) (Pro) on Windows XP Service Pack 2.
If you are in deep water,
you should not hang
Hello, folks!
Address picker: Where have the CC: and BCC: tabs gone? There is only
the To: tab.
--
Cheers!
VA - using The Bat! 3.63.09 (Beta) (Pro) on Windows XP Service Pack 2.
If you are in deep water,
you should not hang the head.
_
[Reply to: Peter Hampf · 2005-12-14 · 12:19 h (CET)]
Hello, Peter!
>> If the cursor is in the Subject field, it does not jump into the
>> message body by typing the tab key.
> That's a known one. The editor part is subject of change, which means that
> this will be fixed soon.
OK, thanks!
Then
Hello Volker,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 5:41:41 AM, you wrote:
VA> If the cursor is in the Subject field, it does not jump into the
VA> message body by typing the tab key.
VA> Any confirmations?
Confirmed. I rolled back one beta version due to the duplication mail
messages and the cursor i
Hello Volker,
> If the cursor is in To:, CC:, Subject: etc. fields, Context menu
> (right-click) does not work.
>
> Confirmations?
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5443
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
Miguel A.
Hello Volker,
> Address picker: Where have the CC: and BCC: tabs gone? There is only
> the To: tab.
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5442
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
U
Hello Vili,
> Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing
> stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does
> not...)
Are you sure?
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
Miguel A.
Hello MAU,
>> Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing
>> stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does
>> not...)
> Are you sure?
100%... I am using 3.62.14.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2
Hello Paul,
V>> Ok, then I should campaign for a "Hungarian", "Russian", etc folder...
V>> Because I have different emailing habits..(?)
> Draft messages are a part of everyone's use. Sorry you do not
> understand that.
No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we
have eno
Hello Vili,
>>> Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing
>>> stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does
>>> not...)
>> Are you sure?
>
> 100%... I am using 3.62.14.
As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see
attached GIF fro
Hello Ian!
On Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 11:39 PM, you wrote:
> At the moment when you prepare a new message, the template is either
> based on the folder or address etc. Once that message has been saved,
> further editing does not see those template features change. To have
> the template featu
Hello Volker!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 4:41 AM, you wrote:
> I don't know, if it has been already mentioned here.
> If the cursor is in the Subject field, it does not jump into the
> message body by typing the tab key.
> Any confirmations?
Confirmed. Mentioned here quite a few times.
Hello Volker!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 5:38 AM, you wrote:
> If the cursor is in To:, CC:, Subject: etc. fields, Context menu
> (right-click) does not work.
> Confirmations?
Again, this is one of a number of bugs in beta v. 3.63.09. We've been
told the development team is working on the
On Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 6:42:00 PM, Vili wrote:
> Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later
> editing???
The real question is why would anyone have to have a message in
preparation IN the outbox when it needed later editing?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS
Hello Mary!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 7:29 AM, you wrote:
> Again, this is one of a number of bugs in beta v. 3.63.09. We've
> been told the development team is working on the editor function of
> the header fields. So no BT logs have been made of these several
> bugs, AFAIK.
I should hav
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:38:13 AM, Vili wrote:
> No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we
> have enough default folders already?
the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing
there. there should be a place to put documents which are i
Hello Dwight!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 8:02 AM, you wrote:
>> ... Dont we have enough default folders already?
> the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages
> residing there. there should be a place to put documents which are
> in process where they are not mixed up wit
On Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 5:14:22 PM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
> I agree. Regardless of the solution the problem is an exception that
> affects a small number of users who have chosen the challenge.
I think that mis-characterizes the problem. It's not like one sets out
to create a problem where
Hello MAU,
Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing
stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does
not...)
>>> Are you sure?
>> 100%... I am using 3.62.14.
> As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see
> attached GI
Hello Dwight,
>> Why would anyone park a message in Outbox if not for later
>> editing???
> The real question is why would anyone have to have a message in
> preparation IN the outbox when it needed later editing?
I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has problem
with it...
Hello Dwight,
>> No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we
>> have enough default folders already?
> the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages residing
> there. there should be a place to put documents which are in process
> where they are not mixed u
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:11:39 AM, Vili wrote:
> I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has
> problem with it...
You aren't suggesting they should just stop developing the program
since 1.3 works well are you?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:12:55 AM, Vili wrote:
> You have a flag to distinguish between them...
please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find one
flag to mark both
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastma
Hello Vili!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:12 AM, you wrote:
>>> No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we
>>> have enough default folders already?
>> the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages
>> residing there. there should be a place to put do
Hello Dwight,
>> You have a flag to distinguish between them...
> please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find
> one flag to mark both
THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag.
Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag...
--
Vili
Hello Dwight,
>> I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has
>> problem with it...
> You aren't suggesting they should just stop developing the program
> since 1.3 works well are you?
This is what I am trying to say: I dont feel it as an improvement. I
feel it like the new GUI:
Het was op woensdag 14 december 2005 om 16:25 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'About TB folders' :
Hoi Mary,
___\/___
o/\o
MB> What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied
MB> to me by the developers?
MB> As has been noted by others, I too never use Inbox-Known.
Hello Mary,
No, it is not part of mine. Yes, I cannot understand that... Dont we
have enough default folders already?
>>> the point is that we have too few where you can edit messages
>>> residing there. there should be a place to put documents which are
>>> in process where they are not
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:59:06 +0100 GMT (14/12/2005, 00:59 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M>>> Please see attached. I've noticed when doing a reply to all with enough
M>>> addresses in the CC field. Really nice!! :)
>>
>> Yes, confirmed with 3.62.14 in the office. :-)
M> I went back to 3.62.14
Hello Vili,
> Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing
> stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does
> not...)
Are you sure?
>>> 100%... I am using 3.62.14.
>> As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see
>> att
Hello Vili!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:29 AM, you wrote:
>>> I am using TB! from v1.3x, support many customers, no one has
>>> problem with it...
>> You aren't suggesting they should just stop developing the program
>> since 1.3 works well are you?
> This is what I am trying to say: I d
Hello Vili!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:34 AM, you wrote:
>> You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same
>> way. Just don't use it.
> :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight
> against it.
I'm hungry.
You're not hungry.
So, you oppose my
Hello Vili!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:34 AM, you wrote:
>> I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior.
>> And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61. What
>> will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied
>> to me by the devel
Het was op woensdag 14 december 2005 om 16:42 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'About TB folders' :
Hoi Mary,
>>> You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same
>>> way. Just don't use it.
>> :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight
>> against it.
MB>
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:34:12 AM, Vili wrote:
>> You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same
>> way. Just don't use it.
> :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight
> against it.
If each of us decided to fight against anything we didn't th
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:27:59 AM, Vili wrote:
>>> You have a flag to distinguish between them...
>> please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find
>> one flag to mark both
> THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag.
> Messages that are
Hello Cees!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:58 AM, you wrote:
You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the
same way. Just don't use it.
>>> :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight
>>> against it.
MB>> I'm hungry.
MB>> You're not hungry.
MB
Hello Vili,
>>> You have a flag to distinguish between them...
>> please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find
>> one flag to mark both
>
> THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag.
>
> Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag...
Thin
Het was op woensdag 14 december 2005 om 17:16 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'About TB folders' :
Hoi MAU,
>> THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag.
>> Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag...
M> Think about it a bit more. The fact that you interpre
Hello Владимир 'insider' Прохоров & everyone else,
on 13-Dez-2005 at 21:19 you (Владимир 'insider' Прохоров) wrote:
>> 3. while the mails are downloaded, the open account log is redrawn out
>> of the screen!
> reproduced in last some dozens of builds...
Thank you. I've filed the bug report at
h
Hello Cees,
> alright Mau, and I wannit NOW! ;)
Drafts folders have been so well accepted by the general public that I
have run out of stock, you'll have to wait a few days until I get some
more from the factory ;-)
Have you seen my signature? I haven't seen your supporting note yet ;-)
--
Be
Hello MAU!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:38 AM, you wrote:
>> alright Mau, and I wannit NOW! ;)
> Drafts folders have been so well accepted by the general public that
> I have run out of stock, you'll have to wait a few days until I get
> some more from the factory ;-)
Thanks, St. Nichol
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
>>> This will save from accidentally sending them. You will have to
>>> explicitly unpark them to send them out.
>>
>> Rubbish.
> Now, there is one of my tigresses! ;-)
With pleasure :) :purr:
We all could benefit from a
Hello Mary,
>> Have you seen my signature? I haven't seen your supporting note yet
>> ;-)
>
> Cees put a supporting note there last night--I asked him for it on
> TBOT.
And how in h...eaven you expect me to know that Cees is Arkanoid?
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' fold
Hello Charlene,
> Help to protect us from the "outbox protection" and add your
That's great!!! :))
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.09 (Beta) on Windows XP
Dwight,
> If I have a mail I want to send Wednesday, which I finish on Monday,
> where do you suggest I put it when it is done? And it has to have a
> flag.
How about a color group for pending messages, and a memo telling you
when it should be sent? You could put it anywhere, even parked in the
Hello MAU!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:53 AM, you wrote:
>>> Have you seen my signature? I haven't seen your supporting note yet
>>> ;-)
>> Cees put a supporting note there last night--I asked him for it on
>> TBOT.
> And how in h...eaven you expect me to know that Cees is Arkanoid?
Th
Hello Mary,
> How I do wish that you had time or inclination to peek in on
> TBOT from time to time, Miguel. :)
I'll propose you a deal. You recruit eleventeen hundred and twenty seven
new supporters for Drafts folder and I'll join TBOT. Deal?
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Dr
Hello MAU!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:42 AM, you wrote:
>> How I do wish that you had time or inclination to peek in on
>> TBOT from time to time, Miguel. :)
> I'll propose you a deal. You recruit eleventeen hundred and twenty
> seven new supporters for Drafts folder and I'll join TBOT.
Hello Vili,
>> I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior.
>> And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61.
>> What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied
>> to me by the developers?
>
> :)) Simpler is always better...
You are ri
Hello MAU!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:54 AM, you wrote:
>>> I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's
>>> behavior. And this has been true for me since my first version, v.
>>> 1.61. What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft
>>> folder supplied to me by the d
Howdy Flying Rodent fans,
Ok. I hope this isnt just me. Or there is another explanation other
than my own stupidity. In .09 my keyboard shortcuts do not work. Not
one of them. Then when I try to exit have to kill through task
manager. Not a one off... put up with it last night...
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
>> Help to protect us from the "outbox protection" and add your
> That's great!!! :))
I claim no copyright on this altered tagline of yours, you may c&p it
anytime :)
--
Help to protect us from the "outbox protection"
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:58:22 AM, Gleason Pace wrote:
>> If I have a mail I want to send Wednesday, which I finish on
>> Monday, where do you suggest I put it when it is done? And it has
>> to have a flag.
> How about a color group for pending messages, and a memo telling you
> when i
Hello all,
It's not a real problem, that's why I say it's tiny, but it' bothering
me not being able to understand what's happening.
I've always had Adobe Reader 6.0 and Adobe Acrobat 4.0 installed in my
system and PDF files where always opened from everywhere with Acrobat.
I believe this was bec
Hello Charlene,
> I claim no copyright on this altered tagline of yours, you may c&p it
> anytime :)
I'll do for the second round if we don't win the first one ;-)
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hello Mary,
> In some real-world offices one has an Outbox and an Inbox on one's
> desk.
Only in some? I'd say in most, if not all.
--
Best regards,
Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat
Hello Ben,
> Ok. I hope this isnt just me. Or there is another explanation other
> than my own stupidity. In .09 my keyboard shortcuts do not work. Not
> one of them. Then when I try to exit have to kill through task
> manager. Not a one off... put up with it last night... but it
Hello Ian!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 1:14 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I am talking about the macro "%NOUSEPGP" .
MB>> In my Account Properties I have the box "Sign when completed" checked
MB>> under Message-Editor settings.
MB>> When I reopen a message in the Outbox for editing--or just to re-re
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> I'll do for the second round if we don't win the first one ;-)
To my opinion they must react, it's us, the customers, who pay for their
work.
--
Help to protect us from the "outbox protection" and add your
support no
Hi Ian
> I am not trying to squash the desire for a draft folder, but this
> issue you describe should be dealt with separately. The reason I say
> this is that if a Drafts folder is introduced because of the surge of
> those wanting it, chances are it will be "cloned" off the Outbox with
> the re
Hello Everyone!
Please support
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5453
It is about the long-standing bug in the Outbox behavior that causes
it to over-ride Address Book template macros for OpenPGP and instead
uses the setting in Account/Properties/Options/Message-editor.
The bug happens like
Hello MAU!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 1:37 PM, you wrote:
>> In some real-world offices one has an Outbox and an Inbox on one's
>> desk.
> Only in some? I'd say in most, if not all.
Was hedging my bets, not having been in a real-world office in quite
some time. Haven't had one of my own s
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] (#0005396) "Move up", "Move down", "Move in", "Move out" are not
working correctly when moving folders across accounts
[-] (#0005295) Button "Toke
"MAU" wrote on 15/12/2005 at 06:28:30 +1100
subject "Tiny problem opening PDF attachments" :
> The 'tiny' problem shows up when I open a PDF attachment in TB, they
> always open with Acrobat 4.0. No real problem, I can view PDFs, but I
> just don't understand why this is happening.
I have almost
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 21:51:49, 9Val wrote:
> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
---
The Bat!
---
Invalid pointer operation.
---
OK
---
---
The Bat!:
Howdy MAU,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 7:39:43 PM, MAU wrotened:
>> Ok. I hope this isnt just me. Or there is another explanation other
>> than my own stupidity. In .09 my keyboard shortcuts do not work. Not
>> one of them. Then when I try to exit have to kill through task
>> man
Hello MAU,
>> Why do you MIX the waiting to send stuff with waiting for editing
>> stuff One type has the parking flag (hourglass), the other does
>> not...)
> Are you sure?
100%... I am using 3.62.14.
>>> As you can see in my signature, I'm using 3.62.14 now. Please see
>
Hello Mary,
>>> You could treat your relationship with the Draft folder in the same
>>> way. Just don't use it.
>> :) I just dont see the meaning to have it... That is why I fight
>> against it.
> I'm hungry.
> You're not hungry.
> So, you oppose my being fed because you don't see the significance
Hello MAU,
>> There is no such group that "Keep". So, each of it is Draft.
> Wrong! There is one of each. Come on, take your _guess_! You have a 50%
> chance of _guessing_ it right ;-)
MAU: show me ANY reference in TB! for such a group as "Keep"...
--
Vili
Hello Dwight,
> If you can articulate a reason why you need an Hungarian folder, and
> what it needs to do which you can't do with the present configuration
> and how it would make TB! a better program I would support your
> advocacy of it.
What is that you cannot do NOW without the Drafts folder
Hello Dwight,
You have a flag to distinguish between them...
>>> please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find
>>> one flag to mark both
>> THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag.
>> Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag...
>
Hi 9Val,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of bugs:
[+] filtering broken: Jernej Simoncic's message wasn't filtered to the
correct folder but remained unpro
Hallo 9Val,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:51:49 +0200GMT (14-12-2005, 21:51 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
9> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Well, it's running over here. The previous version didn't.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Taglines: bumper stickers
Hello MAU,
You have a flag to distinguish between them...
>>> please send screen shot illustrating this, because I can only find
>>> one flag to mark both
>> THAT is the point!!! Mails that should be sent DOES NOT have a flag.
>> Messages that are waiting for editing DO have a flag...
> Thi
9Val,
> Hello All,
> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Up and running well here.
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [-] (#0005396) "Move up", "Move down", "Move in", "Move out" are not
> working correctly when moving folders
Hello MAU,
>>> I am constantly having to do work-arounds of the Outbox's behavior.
>>> And this has been true for me since my first version, v. 1.61.
>>> What will it hurt you, Vili, if I have a working Draft folder supplied
>>> to me by the developers?
>> :)) Simpler is always better...
> You are
Hallo Jernej,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:02:21 +0100GMT (14-12-2005, 22:02 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
>> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
JS> Invalid pointer operation.
JS> Are you planning to fix this at all?
They did for me. I couldn't run the previous either, but this one
work
Hello 9Val!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 2:51 PM, you wrote:
> [-] (#0005207) Edit action, headers, network dialog and message
> finder might have wrong characters when using
> translations to Cyrillic alphabets.
There are still a number of thing
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 1:42:43 PM, Mary Bull wrote:
>> I can see the rush to a Drafts folder end up causing more problems
>> than it will solve.
> I think the developers are in no rush.
> I think the desire of posters here and loggers of supporting notes to
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt
Hello MAU,
> The 'tiny' problem shows up when I open a PDF attachment in TB, they
> always open with Acrobat 4.0. No real problem, I can view PDFs, but I
> just don't understand why this is happening.
Maybe TB! call the "show" association of the extension? I mean like
instead of calling
"open %1"
Hallo Mary,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:17:25 -0600GMT (14-12-2005, 21:17 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MB> It is about the long-standing bug in the Outbox behavior that causes
MB> it to over-ride Address Book template macros for OpenPGP and instead
MB> uses the setting in Account/Properties/Option
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 22:19:18, Roelof Otten wrote:
> They did for me. I couldn't run the previous either, but this one
> works.
> What's the difference between your and my config? (see sig)
A lot - 8 POP3 accounts (7 active), 2 IMAP accounts, no OTFE.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><><
Greetings BatPeople,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 4:16:49 PM, Charlene wrote:
C> [+] manually forced refiltering of my inbox caused AV.
Tested the re-filter of inbox and it got as far as reading first
message before freezing. Had to 3-finger to abort. (I waited up to
5 minutes before aborting.)
Hello Dwight!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 3:35 PM, you wrote:
>>> I can see the rush to a Drafts folder end up causing more problems
>>> than it will solve.
>> I think the developers are in no rush.
>> I think the desire of posters here and loggers of supporting notes
>> to https://www.rit
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36312.rar
The only change is problem with filters.
--
9Val
Cu
Hello 9Val,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 10:03:43 PM, you wrote:
> Hello All,
> The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36312.rar
> The only change is problem with filters.
What about the problems with SMIME?
Sean
--
+---
Hello 9Val,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 8:51:49 PM, you wrote:
> Hello All,
> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [-] (#0005396) "Move up", "Move down", "Move in", "Move out" are not
> worki
Hallo Jernej,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:29:49 +0100GMT (14-12-2005, 22:29 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
>> What's the difference between your and my config? (see sig)
JS> A lot
Yep, about everything, I see. ;-)
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Hey, I'm not paranoid! Which of my enemies told you this?
The
Jernej,
On 14-12-2005 22:29, you [JS] wrote in
:
>> They did for me. I couldn't run the previous either, but this one
>> works. What's the difference between your and my config? (see sig)
JS> A lot - 8 POP3 accounts (7 active), 2 IMAP accounts, no OTFE.
Similar to my setup.
I will try it tomorr
In the last version, I reported that the cursor was ending up in the
TO: pane, not after the quote as it should per my template and earlier
behavior.
I have now observed further that when a reply is created, in the
current beta, that for an instant when the reply is drawn, it appears
where it shou
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, at 22:19:18 [UTC+0100] (Wednesday, December
14, 2005 22:19 my local time) Roelof Otten wrote:
>>> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
JS>> Invalid pointer operation.
JS>> Are you planning to fix this at all?
> They did for me. I couldn't run the previou
Hello 9Val,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 3:51:49 PM, you wrote:
9> The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
The program loaded and received mail with no problems (using POP3).
However, when sending mail, the program hangs.
I'm using Norton Anti-virus
Hello Roelof!
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 3:29 PM, you wrote:
> Basically what you ask for is a complete new macro engine. That's no
> bugfix, but a new feature.
> Mind you, I don't mind such a new feature, after all I run into this
> myself every once in a while, but add it to the wishlist
Greetings BatPeople,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 4:40:29 PM, Charlene wrote:
C> Hi Wolffe,
C> Wednesday, December 14, 2005
C> you let us know -at least in parts- :
>> Tested the re-filter of inbox and it got as far as reading first
>> message before freezing. Had to 3-finger to abort. (I wait
Hi Wolffe,
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> Tested the re-filter of inbox and it got as far as reading first
> message before freezing. Had to 3-finger to abort. (I waited up to
> 5 minutes before aborting.)
And the filtering worked on your system? Mine was co
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
