It is a much better reason to have a Drafts folder :) I can see WHY
would this be beneficial, now.
fxChoirs of heavenly voices sing 'hallelujah'/fx
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.63.06 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Pack 2 Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.4, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 3:01 AM, you wrote:
[Vili]:
It is a much better reason to have a Drafts folder :) I can see WHY
would this be beneficial, now.
[Stuart H.]:
fxChoirs of heavenly voices sing 'hallelujah'/fx
[Mary B.]:
Amen and *amen*!! :)
:cloud9:
--
Best regards,
Hello Roger!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 1:32 AM, you wrote:
ST I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I
ST don't understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work
ST for you?
MP I haven't followed the discussion at all (and don't use the
MP latest beta yet), but
Hi Mary,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -possibly edited- :
Thanks for putting that information on BT at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
Hope this issue and all those concerning headers will be fixed ASAP.
This may be related to the missing template macros as
Hello Charlene!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 5:33 AM, you wrote:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
Hope this issue and all those concerning headers will be fixed ASAP.
Stefan reports on that page that this issue is fixed in v. 3.63.13.
This may be related to the missing template
Hello all,
Someone from this list is and has been adding notes on behalf of others,
actually copy/pasting messages from this list, to:
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
While the posting and the notes are appreciated because they are in
support of the wish, I think that whomever is
Timestamp: Friday, December 16, 2005 local time: 7:16:00 PM
Hello TBBETA,
Am I the only one expecting. ;-)
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.63.12 (Beta) Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at:
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 12:17:17 PM, Henk M.de Bruijn wrote:
Am I the only one expecting. ;-)
No. I think everyone has been looking and looking and waiting, and
trying to decide to post as you finally did the question
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.63.13 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] (#0005455) Special characters were not QP-encoded in headers
[-] (#0005446) Fields being edited weren't properly updated in the
header editor
[-]
Hello Charlene Ferrara,
on Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:46:14 +0100 (2005-12-16 23:46:14 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [CF]
wrote (at least in part):
CF Should have earned a more informative subject line... *scnr*
Could it be for the same reason that, using this
Hello all,
Peter wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could it be for the same reason that, using this version, whatever I
type as subject, TB insists to send the email with an empty subject
header line ... ???
Right now the subject line is properly filled, let's see how this one
works. BTW: your
Hello 9Val,
on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:39:43 +0200 (2005-12-16 23:39:43 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
[] wrote (at least in part):
9 [-] (#0005462) Custom header fields were not stored into outgoing
9messages
Not fixed.
Others:
- Using the
Dear Peter,
@17-Dec-2005, 00:03 +0100 (16-Dec 23:03 here) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Charlene:
CF Should have earned a more informative subject line... *scnr*
PO Could it be for the same reason that, using this version, whatever I
PO type as subject, TB insists to send
Hi Peter Ouwehand,
Saturday, December 17, 2005
you let us know -possibly edited- :
Could it be for the same reason that, using this version, whatever I
type as subject, TB insists to send the email with an empty subject
header line ... ???
Confirmed and switched back to previous beta.
--
Hello Peter,
CF Should have earned a more informative subject line... *scnr*
Could it be for the same reason that, using this version, whatever I
type as subject, TB insists to send the email with an empty subject
header line ... ???
And it seems to have problems with In-Reply-To: and
Hello Charlene Ferrara,
on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:17:31 +0100 (2005-12-17 00:17:31 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [CF]
wrote (at least in part):
CF BTW: your rogue still won't show up.
Cause it ain't fixed, IMHO.
CF I put my handle manually in.
I've searched for
Hello all,
Back all the way to 3.62.14
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Winamp Playing: Brother Jay - Walk in the Spirit (Smoothjazz.Com - The
worlds best Smooth Jazz - Live From Monterey Bay)
Hello 9Val,
Friday, December 16, 2005, 10:39:43 PM, you wrote:
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.63.13 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
Still refuses to use SMIME certs that work with previous versions of
TB!
Sean
--
Hi Paul,
You wrote:
M Again fully agree. Except that even if they implement this
nonsense they M will not loose me as a user. With or without this
'nonsense' implemented M there is nothing out there that can replace
TB.
So True..
Well, here I am, using Mulberry while
Hello Sean,
Friday, December 16, 2005, 11:32:07 PM, you wrote:
Hello 9Val,
Friday, December 16, 2005, 10:39:43 PM, you wrote:
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.63.13 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
Still refuses to use SMIME certs
Hello.
Here's what Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on
Friday, December 16, 2005 18:33 -0500 wrote:
Well, here I am, using Mulberry while feeling the same way some time
ago.
I'm back to Mulberry too and I doubt I'll be returning to the Bat!.
Although it has some things I really like (such
Hi MAU,
You wrote:
As a well-informed adult, shouldn't you think about all users and not
just of yourself?
IMO, on a slightly different slant, it's not good form to remove
features that already exist, if this is what you're implying. Add the
drafts folder, but DO NOT remove the
Hi Stuart,
You wrote:
Of course if all the IMAP testers do this, then how will we know when
it actually gets fixed. ;)
Well, I'm willing to give it a go if there's a release which is
*explicitly* stated to address this crippling problem. I'm not about to
try any recent betas for that
Hi Matt,
You wrote:
Suddenly, 25+ local folders
disappeared along with the email in them. Not good.
Were those really local folders or IMAP folders? Local folders cannot
be created in a TB! IMAP account. You have to use folders within a POP
account or common folders for them to be
Hello MAU,
CF Should have earned a more informative subject line... *scnr*
Could it be for the same reason that, using this version, whatever I
type as subject, TB insists to send the email with an empty subject
header line ... ???
And it seems to have problems with In-Reply-To: and
Hello Curtis,
Friday, December 16, 2005, 5:58:42 PM, you wrote:
C Well, I'm willing to give it a go if there's a release which is
C *explicitly* stated to address this crippling problem. I'm not about to
C try any recent betas for that reason.
I hear ya, but its very frustrating.
--
Stuart
Hi Randy,
You wrote:
Maybe I'll give it a shot again at next release. But this on-going
never-actually-fix-anything beta cycle is tiring.
Well, if you changed that to
on-going-never-actually-fixing-anything-IMAP beta cycles, then I'd
agree. They are clearly fixing many other issues.
Hi Stuart,
You wrote:
I hear ya, but its very frustrating.
I know, but if you ask me, bandwidth eating issues shouldn't really be
up for beta testing. That's more an alpha... in house testing issue,
isn't it. Afterall, we're talking about you losing access to your
account??? I
Hello MAU...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:29:57 +0100, you wrote:
Hello all,
Back all the way to 3.62.14
Me too! Seems like v3.62.14 is a reliable vintage for me. I've
reverted back to it with every beta since. Now I wish there was a TBV
version that matched v3.62.14!
--
steverio
TB!v3.62.14
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 6:14:52 PM, Curtis wrote:
I know, but if you ask me, bandwidth eating issues shouldn't really
be up for beta testing.
what bandwidth eating issues? I've used 38.2 mb so far this month.
I've got 40+ folders, enough traffic just to qualify as busy from TBOT
and
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 5:40:45 PM, Randy wrote:
it simply can't beat Mulberry as far as IMAP is concerned.
except when you have to look at the screen and read the mail, or want
to filter something or use quick templates, or do anything else
productive.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S
Hello 9Val!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 4:39 PM, you wrote:
The Bat! 3.63.13 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] (#0005455) Special characters were not QP-encoded in headers
Not an issue for me, so can't test.
[-]
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
what bandwidth eating issues? I've used 38.2 mb so far this month.
I've got 40+ folders, enough traffic just to qualify as busy from TBOT
and TBBETA, check regularly 4 POP accounts at fastmail and download.
Is less than 3 mb a day lots?
That's like saying you can't
Hello Mary...
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:34:18 -0600, you wrote:
Thanks anyway for the hard work, 9Val and team. :)
I second that!
Not all betas are gleaming like diamonds for everyone. I'm looking
forward to see some more TB gems! :)
--
steverio
TB!v3.62.14
TBV!v3.63.09
Windows XP Pro 5.1
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 4:39:43 PM, 9Val wrote:
[-] (#0005456) %CURSOR=BODY macro was not functional
Well, there is a little good news. This seems to actually be fixed.
going back to .08 now.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 8:09:34 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
[-] (#0005456) %CURSOR=BODY macro was not functional
Well, there is a little good news. This seems to actually be fixed.
going back to .08 now.
threading is also obviously broken, because I replied to 9val's
announcement, and
Hello,
when I enter text in To editor header, Autocomplete list box
suggests addresses from Certificate databases.
If somebody likes this, there should be checkbox in Preferences
dialog, section System | Autocomplete, but I do not like this and
want to have this disabled as default.
Bugtraq:
Hello,
I have opened editor, typed some chars into header and before I
saved this message, Autocomplete list box appeared - editor is
closed and error Cannot focus disabled or invisible window
appears.
Bugtraq:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5471
--
Thanks and Bye,
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 8:20:27 PM, Peter Ouwehand wrote:
V3.63.13 is not fit for beta testing.
fully concur. used it only long enough to confirm that they did fix
the %cursor problem
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at
Hello Dwight!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 9:03 PM, you wrote:
V3.63.13 is not fit for beta testing.
fully concur. used it only long enough to confirm that they did fix
the %cursor problem
And they fixed my nickname/address book problem. A feature that I may
be the only one here using. But
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 at 00:03:15 +0100, (which is
17.12.2005 at 01:03:15 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
Could it be for the same reason that, using this version, whatever I
type as subject, TB insists to send the email with an empty subject
header line ... ???
Yes, the subject
41 matches
Mail list logo
