On Wednesday, December 28, 2005, at 20:39:13 [UTC-0500] (Wednesday,
December 28, 2005 02:39 my local time) Paul Van Noord wrote:
ZW>> Did you checked this on 'Reply' button? Several users confirmed that only
ZW>> this button menu is corrupted. 'Create a new message' button has correct
ZW>> submenu
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:29:11 +0100 GMT (28/12/2005, 00:29 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> In the message list here is no Subject: and no From: and both received
PM> and created date show Dec 30, 1899, 0:00h. An 85 K screenshot is here:
PM> http://www.meynsweb.com/tbbeta/1899.png.
Hello Curtis,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:19:23 -0500 GMT (28/12/2005, 00:19 +0700 GMT),
Curtis wrote:
C> I decided to start reading TBOT with reference threading again, to see
C> if this message list bug of the list drifting to the left and out of
C> view is still present.
Confirmed.
C> Even worse,
12/27/2005 8:38 PM
Hi Zygmunt,
On 12/27/2005 Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
ZW> Did you checked this on 'Reply' button? Several users confirmed that only
ZW> this button menu is corrupted. 'Create a new message' button has correct
ZW> submenu.
It is available from Reply button here.
--
Take Ca
Zygmunt...
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:54:12 +0100, you wrote:
>Did you checked this on 'Reply' button? Several users confirmed that only
>this button menu is corrupted. 'Create a new message' button has correct
>submenu.
For some reason, I do not have this issue.
--
steverio
TB!v3.64.01 Christm
Hello Zygmunt...
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:25:11 +0100, you wrote:
>Hello all!
>
>Use of quick templates from Reply button submenu is impossible in TB!
>3.64.01. Reply button submenu should contain a list of templates that have
>checked "Use for Reply messages" option. Unfortunately, the list is em
Hello all,
Tuesday, December 27, 2005, Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
> Use of quick templates from Reply button submenu is impossible in TB!
> 3.64.01. Reply button submenu should contain a list of templates that have
> checked "Use for Reply messages" option. Unfortunately, the list is empty,
> de
Hello Roelof...
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:05:59 +0100, you wrote:
>...
>Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
>just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
>instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out steverio2k.
>
> )<)))'>
>
>Please inc
Hallo Peter,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:18:50 +0100GMT (27-12-2005, 21:18 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
PM> Thank you and Zeynel. So I'll file it under "just another unsolved
PM> mystery"... ;-)
I guess that's the best. Same as those incidental times that I can't
read Cees' messages while nobody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Roelof,
on Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:49:19 +0100GMT (27.12.2005, 18:49 +0100GMT
here), you wrote:
PM>> I get a strange display of this message on TBUDL:
PM>> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PM>> Can anyone take a look at this message and tell me how it is d
Hallo steverio2k,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:54:29 -0800GMT (27-12-2005, 19:54 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
S> Confirmed...Tahoma size 11 makes the lines jump while typing the
S> address manually.
S>
S> Current beta is NONE | 'Using TBBET
Alexander...
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:40:58 +0100, you wrote:
>OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
>
>Tahoma 8, 9 and 10 are no problem. Tahoma size 11 makes the lines jump up &
>down by one pixel.
>
>Segoe UI sizes 8 and 9 are no problem either, but here it starts to jump at
>size 10
Hello Marek!
On Tuesday, December 27, 2005, 12:36 PM, you wrote:
> when You open editor and hit Enter in empty header, "Pick email
> addresses" dialog is not opened like in previous versions.
> Bugtraq:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5522
Confirmed.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.6
Hello,
when You open editor and hit Enter in empty header, "Pick email
addresses" dialog is not opened like in previous versions.
Bugtraq:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5522
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.64.01
Hallo Allie,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:19:23 -0500GMT (27-12-2005, 18:19 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
AM> Even worse, when the drifting of the list to the left occurs, there's no
AM> horizontal scrollbar to use to bring it back into view.
Confirmed.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
If at first you don't
Hallo Peter,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:29:11 +0100GMT (27-12-2005, 18:29 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
PM> I get a strange display of this message on TBUDL:
PM> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PM> Can anyone take a look at this message and tell me how it is displayed
PM> there?
Shows just fine over here.
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 at 18:29:11 +0100, (which is
27.12.2005 at 19:29:11 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
> I get a strange display of this message on TBUDL:
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can anyone take a look at this message and tell me how it is displayed
> there?
That message displ
Hi all,
I get a strange display of this message on TBUDL:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone take a look at this message and tell me how it is displayed
there?
In the message list here is no Subject: and no From: and both received
and created date show Dec 30, 1899, 0:00h. An 85 K screenshot is he
Hi all,
I decided to start reading TBOT with reference threading again, to see
if this message list bug of the list drifting to the left and out of
view is still present.
It still is as shown in this capture:
http://www.aimlink.name/pics/list.png
Note that there's a lot of space in the window t
Hello Curtis,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:22:56 -0500 GMT (27/12/2005, 20:22 +0700 GMT),
Curtis wrote:
C> I know that the original auto-complete had a deliberate delay for it's
C> appearance. Someone queried the delay and the answer by one of the
C> developers was that the delay was put there to preve
On 27/12/2005 at 8:04:38 AM [GMT -0500], Roelof Otten wrote:
> After I've typed the second letter of the recipient the drop down list
> appears on the count of two.
> It may have something to do with the size of the AB (1147 entries over
> here) and the speed of the system.
I doubt this since I h
Hallo Thomas,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:27:18 +0700GMT (27-12-2005, 13:27 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
TF> I have nothing against the drop-down, but it seems to take a second or
TF> two to appear. That's slow. Only here?
After I've typed the second letter of the recipient the drop down list
app
12/27/2005 7:48 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 12/27/2005 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> I have nothing against the drop-down, but it seems to take a second or
TF> two to appear. That's slow. Only here?
Here too. It is slower using Voyager on the flash drive than Pro w/o
OTFE on the hard drive. Understandable
Hello Curtis!
On Tuesday, December 27, 2005, 5:58 AM, you wrote:
>> Done. I had my setting for Arial Black, font size 9. It still jumps at
>> font size 8, the lowest possible setting. But I need Arial Black for
>> the contrast. It's a vision disability that I have.
> I can't confirm with Arial B
On 27/12/2005 at 7:27:18 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I have nothing against the drop-down, but it seems to take a second or
> two to appear. That's slow. Only here?
No. Not here, and I agree. While I can see the reason for delaying
in-line auto-complete, I fail to see the reason for
Hello Curtis,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:53:19 -0500 GMT (27/12/2005, 18:53 +0700 GMT),
Curtis wrote:
>> I agree, the drop-downs are very distracting and slow the process,
>> especially using Voyager on a flash drive. Here's hoping they drop
>> dead!
C> And here was I hailing it's arrival. ;)
I h
12/27/2005 7:01 AM
Hi Curtis,
On 12/27/2005 Curtis wrote:
C> On 27/12/2005 at 6:36:35 AM [GMT -0500], Paul Van Noord wrote:
>> I agree, the drop-downs are very distracting and slow the process,
>> especially using Voyager on a flash drive. Here's hoping they drop
>> dead!
C> And here was I h
12/27/2005 6:54 AM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/27/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK> Besides that,
ASK> this problem did not occur in previous versions (IIRC).
OK, but I suggest it came with the annoying drop-down feature.
ASK> It doesn't seem very "logical" to me that the entire header pane is jumpi
On 27/12/2005 at 6:22:12 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote:
> Done. I had my setting for Arial Black, font size 9. It still jumps at
> font size 8, the lowest possible setting. But I need Arial Black for
> the contrast. It's a vision disability that I have.
I can't confirm with Arial Black at size
On 27/12/2005 at 6:36:35 AM [GMT -0500], Paul Van Noord wrote:
> I agree, the drop-downs are very distracting and slow the process,
> especially using Voyager on a flash drive. Here's hoping they drop
> dead!
And here was I hailing it's arrival. ;)
In the past, I'd -<+> through possible matche
Hello Paul Van Noord & everyone else,
on 27-Dez-2005 at 12:45 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
> I use Tahoma at 8 point in 1280 X 1024 resolution with no problem.
OK.
> Moving to 11 point is way beyond the design
I think thats up to the end user, and not the programmer. The year is 2005
and GUIs s
12/27/2005 6:43 AM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/27/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK> Please, anyone, try to open Options / Preferences / Messages / Header
ASK> Layout and set the font to Tahoma 11, or some other font, using a larger
ASK> size.
I use Tahoma at 8 point in 1280 X 1024 resolution with no
On 27/12/2005 at 5:40:58 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Please, anyone, try to open Options / Preferences / Messages / Header
> Layout and set the font to Tahoma 11, or some other font, using a larger
> size.
Ok. I confirmed it using Verdana at size 11. Quite a whacky effect. :)
Good
12/27/2005 6:31 AM
Hi Mary,
On 12/27/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB> 2 listings here:
MB> GIGABYTE MAYA RADEON 9000 PRO
MB> GIGABYTE MAYA RADEON 9000 PRO Secondary
Uou also have an ATI video ship but it isn't DirectX 9 enabled whereas
all the others(including mine) are DirectX 9 capable?
MB> Th
Hello Alexander!
On Tuesday, December 27, 2005, 4:40 AM, you wrote:
> OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
> Tahoma 8, 9 and 10 are no problem. Tahoma size 11 makes the lines
> jump up & down by one pixel.
Confirmed.
> Segoe UI sizes 8 and 9 are no problem either, but here it starts
Hallo Alexander,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:40:58 +0100GMT (27-12-2005, 11:40 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
ASK> OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
ASK> Tahoma 8, 9 and 10 are no problem. Tahoma size 11 makes the lines jump up &
ASK> down by one pixel.
Confirmed with Tahoma size 12,
Hello ...in addition to my previous message...
on 27-Dez-2005 at 00:37 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
> I have to check if it has something to do with the font I'm using (Segoe
> UI, I think size 9). I'll get back to you when I tried it.
OK, I found it. Its the font size that matters.
Tahoma 8,
Hello Curtis!
On Monday, December 26, 2005, 9:18 PM, you wrote:
>> I can't find out what the name of my video card is.
> Try this:
> - right click your 'My Computer' icon and select 'Properties'.
> - Select the tab marked 'Hardware'.
> - Hit the 'Device Manager' button.
I didn't think of looking
38 matches
Mail list logo
