On Tuesday, January 10, 2006 Peter Hampf wrote:
> not here. It simply does not "see" my database.
The same here. I have to go back to 3.64.3.
Best regards,
Maik
--
Ut sementem feceris, ita metes.
[Cicero, de oratore 2, 65, 261]
Using The Bat! v3.64.03 Christmas Edition
(on-the-fly
Hello Greg!
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:52 PM, you wrote:
> Is PCWize.com down? ...
> Leif?
Greg, I'm not Leif, but he has posted to TBOT on January 9 that the
server will be down for awhile.
begin copy-and-paste of Leif's post to TBOT
... PCWize will be down fo
Hello Greg,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:52:51 PM, you wrote:
G> Is PCWize.com down? With FireFox I'm getting:
G> ,- [ ]
G> | Unable to connect
G> |
G> | Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at www.pcwize.com.
G> `---
I have not been able to reach it either.
--
Stuart
Recently, Greg squawked:
> Is PCWize.com down? With FireFox I'm getting:
Pings OK
But neither Opera nor FF can connect because
All I see is SYN && RST ACK
trace-route OK
209.12.175.59 220ms 398ms 233ms TTL:112 (59.cblpc.com bogus rDNS: h
pcwize.com SOA (Zone of Authority)
Primar
Hello Robert,
> When someone sends me a nice jpeg picture, the usually think I am on a
> T1 line or DSL. So they make the file 2MB and it takes me a half hour
> to download.
>
> So, I have the Account Properties |Mail Management | receive the
> headers if the message is larger than 30K bytes.
Tha
Recently, MAU squawked:
MM>>> [*] Large message notification now includes modified subject of
MM>>> the
I was **trying** to respond to your email BUT my reply template which
uses Januk_Driver and Extract, cut you off at the above line for some
strange reason.
but you asked,
"What are these not
Hello Thomas,
MM>> [*] Large message notification now includes modified subject of the
original message
>
> This is a nice addition, thanks. Will report back whether it works
> over here.
What are these notifications and how/where are they suppose to work?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (E
Hi Dwight A Corrin,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
>> It contains a word, "beta" :)))
> true enough, but in his defense, if you look at the help/about screen,
> there is no similar mention of beta, or when the version is identified
> in one's signature
And no re
Hi Mary,
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
Try doing some searches. Tell me if you get an access error.
AIK>>> Tried some searches (for text only) and it worked just fine. I
AIK>>> don't know, has the search been tuned even more? It feels very
AIK>>> fast here
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:37:28 +0200 GMT (11/01/2006, 00:37 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> [*] Large message notification now includes modified subject of the
original message
This is a nice addition, thanks. Will report back whether it works
over here.
Remark: If I click on
Hello Dwight,
>> The link was this:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-65.msi
>> It contains a word, "beta" :)))
> true enough, but in his defense, if you look at the help/about screen,
> there is no similar mention of beta, or when the version is identified
> in o
Hello Dwight!
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 8:41 AM, you wrote:
>> The link was this:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-65.msi
>> It contains a word, "beta" :)))
> true enough, but in his defense, if you look at the help/about screen,
> there is no similar me
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 9:06:04 AM, Ethan J. Mings wrote:
EJM> I've added my voice of support instead of opening a new bug report.
EJM> You're right, the problem was in the last beta, not just this one.
Thank you Jerry.
Jon
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Bu
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 3:03:17 AM, Vili wrote:
> The link was this:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-65.msi
> It contains a word, "beta" :)))
true enough, but in his defense, if you look at the help/about screen,
there is no similar mention of beta, or
Hello Jon,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:50:17 AM, you wrote:
JP> I also reverted to 3.64.01 because of this bug I first reported for
JP> 3.64.03. My conditions were more specific, but as time goes on I have
JP> noticed more testers reporting problems with the search feature. See
JP> https://www
On Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 4:19:58 PM, Ethan J. Mings wrote:
EJM> The installation of the program went well. However, serious problems
EJM> exist in the version with the search feature.
EJM> If I select a domain
EJM> Search in Headers
EJM> The program locks up and reports and access error.
E
Hello all,
Just to inform the list.
In regards to my with
Subject "3.64.03: Again some VFs not auto-refreshing" I found out that
the problem is not an 'auto-refresh' one but of search not working with
'Text'. I opened a new BT report
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5580
but it was immed
1/11/2006 6:58 AM
Hi Vili,
On 1/11/2006 Vili wrote:
V> It contains a word, "beta" :)))
Yeah, I missed that.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.64.03 Christmas Edition on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP No OTFE Opera 8.51
Current
1/11/2006 6:56 AM
Hi Dwight,
On 1/10/2006 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC> This isn't a release is it ?
No, I assumed it was but thankfully it isn't (yet).
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.64.03 Christmas Edition on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP No OTFE Opera 8.51
__
Hello Roelof!
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 5:17 AM, you wrote:
MB>> But the QT AB entry for me is still not working, even after dropping
MB>> back.
> My first guess would be that he somehow put you more than once in his
> AB. That's the most common cause for this kind of problem.
Thank you v
Hello Maxim!
On Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 11:37 AM, you wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-65.msi
There is still a problem in TB! v. 3.65.msi (Pro) with Address Book
templates that use Quick Templates with the macro %QINCLUDE= .
I reported this on behalf
Hi Peter,
>> No, I've fixed problem with non-working filters on OTFE
PH> but you do remember the problem?
Sure :)
PH> The bug that TB did not recognise the database in OTFE mode was fixed in an
PH> interims-version you sent me.
Actually there was no problem in database recognition, only in wo
Hallo Mary,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:02:50 -0600GMT (9-1-2006, 21:02 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MB> But the QT AB entry for me is still not working, even after dropping
MB> back.
My first guess would be that he somehow put you more than once in his
AB. That's the most common cause for this ki
Hello Thomas!
On Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 7:30 AM, you wrote:
MB>> -Template
MB>> %QINCLUDE="PrGreeting"
MB>> %Cursor
MB>> %QINCLUDE="SigEPr"
MB>> %ENCRYPTCOMPLETE
MB>> %LANGUAGE="BR"
MB>> %ACCO
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 10:19:17 PM, you wrote:
MDP> I don't recall that. You may be right. The majority are not seeing
MDP> errors, while those few that are having problems (and they all seem to
MDP> be show stoppers) seem unable to convey what the problems are in a way
MDP> that
Hi Peter,
PH> It showed the same behaviour some betas ago and 9Val (AFAIR it was 9Val)
PH> fixed it.
No, I've fixed problem with non-working filters on OTFE
--
9Val
C
Hi Robert,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, at 10:52:55 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:52 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Invalid Class Typecast with 3.65'
> I am getting the message "Invalid Class Typecast" when I hit send after
> writing a reply to a message, and also when I try to save the message in
> the out
Group
I am getting the message "Invalid Class Typecast" when I hit send after
writing a reply to a message, and also when I try to save the message in
the outbox.
When I try to save the reply as draft I get the a AV at address 458BF08B
Has anyone else seen this.
Could this be related to the "Ou
Hello Paul,
MDP>> Releasing an MSI for testing here is only expected. Heck, I'd rather
MDP>> they did that than just announce 6.5 as a public release without us
MDP>> ripping it to shreds first!
> I guess I should have checked. I made the wrong assumption that MSI's
> were automatically used as re
Hello Paul,
MB>> V. 3.65 .msi is not presently on the Download page at www.ritlabs.com
> Whew, I'm glad for that!
The link was this:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_3-65.msi
It contains a word, "beta" :)))
--
Vili
The Bat 3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5
30 matches
Mail list logo
