Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:55:29 +0100 GMT (27/Feb/09, 22:55 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF But then, the TBBETA community seems to see this as too revolutionary
TF at the moment.
RO I don't know about he community, but I think the idea definitely has
RO some merits. I have a
Samstag, 28. Februar 2009 at 06:15, Kertész Vilmos wrote:
IMAP in thunderbird 3 beta made several improvements.
I can not see if it is getting better or different.
And why do we read it here?
Why do you ask for something you might know already?
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
IMAP in thunderbird 3 beta made several improvements.
I can not see if it is getting better or different.
And why do we read it here?
Why do you ask for something you might know already?
If I would have known already, I would not have sent that email.
Really, I dont have a clue. Also, you
Samstag, 28. Februar 2009 at 18:10, Kertész Vilmos wrote:
IMAP in thunderbird 3 beta made several improvements.
I can not see if it is getting better or different.
And why do we read it here?
Why do you ask for something you might know already?
If I would have known already, I would not
Hello all,
Saturday, February 28, 2009, Jens Franik wrote:
If I would have known already, I would not have sent that email.
Ok, i wanted to point out, that the other Applications are developed
more and more in the IMAP Area, where The Bat! used to be a kind of
choice - if The Bat! looses
You miss the point: Ritlabs does not seem to care that paying customers
are leaving for better Emails Clients that have working IMAP.
Better IMAP has been promissed for as long as i can thinkand remember.
BTW: this is written via Thunderbird with working IMAP!
regards
Christian
Samstag,
Troll
Hello Christian,
Saturday, February 28, 2009 at 19:26:05, you wrote :
BTW: this is written via Thunderbird with working IMAP!
Sure you don't use TB!:
- your mail isn't correctly quoted
- your sig isn't conform (dash dash space CR)
In french it's called pigquoting !
/Troll and I beg the
Hello Tbbeta,
The last beta has possibility to postpone message delivery
(Options/Delay message) and a macro %DELAY in templates. The
interface is not yet final and may have typos, but you may now
specify the message to be sent later. Please let us know what do you think
about this
Samstag, 28. Februar 2009 at 19:22, Marek Mikus wrote:
rewriting IMAP code was confirmed
several times in the last years, you are right.
and is under development right now
If you know this 100%, i can not be sure, before i see the first
results. And everybody, especial longtime users are
Hello Tbbeta,
The last beta has possibility to postpone message delivery
(Options/Delay message) and a macro %DELAY in templates. The
interface is not yet final and may have typos, but you may now
specify the message to be sent later. Please let us know what do you think
about this
Hello Marek,
Saturday, February 28, 2009, 7:22:58 PM, you wrote:
rewriting IMAP code was confirmed and is under development right now, this
Care to point to the exact source of this information?
I mean: when and where did Ritlabs make any obligations as to:
(1) What exactly is going to be
Hello all,
Saturday, February 28, 2009, Robert Tomanek wrote:
Care to point to the exact source of this information?
Stef wrote this to TBBETA before release of 4.1
We've made changes to the message base format in order to improve IMAP
in the next release, so it was the first step. As soon
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-02-28 · 22:44 h (CET)]
Moin, Marek!
Care to point to the exact source of this information?
Stef wrote this to TBBETA before release of 4.1
Yep, see mid:1124908893.20081030210...@thebat.net.
Cheers!
VA
- --
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end
Am 28.02.2009 19:45, schrieb Francis Dhumes:
Troll
Hello Christian,
Saturday, February 28, 2009 at 19:26:05, you wrote :
BTW: this is written via Thunderbird with working IMAP!
Sure you don't use TB!:
- your mail isn't correctly quoted
- your sig isn't conform (dash dash space CR)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings Beta Listers,
This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you
of the primary purpose of this discussion list.
To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message.
Before posting a question to the
Hello Robert,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:35:28 +0100 GMT (01/Mar/09, 4:35 +0700 GMT),
Robert Tomanek wrote:
rewriting IMAP code was confirmed and is under development right now, this
RT Care to point to the exact source of this information?
RT I mean: when and where did Ritlabs make any
Hello Robert,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:35:28 +0100 GMT (01/Mar/09, 4:35 +0700 GMT),
Robert Tomanek wrote:
rewriting IMAP code was confirmed and is under development right now, this
RT Care to point to the exact source of this information?
RT I mean: when and where did Ritlabs make any
Hello Marek,
Saturday, February 28, 2009, 10:44:26 PM, you wrote:
Care to point to the exact source of this information?
Stef wrote this to TBBETA before release of 4.1
We've made changes to the message base format in order to improve IMAP
in the next release, so it was the first step. As
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, March 1, 2009, 3:16:16 AM, you wrote:
rewriting IMAP code was confirmed and is under development right now, this
Care to point to the exact source of this information?
I mean: when and where did Ritlabs make any obligations as to:
(1) What exactly is going to be
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jens Franik je...@gmx.de wrote:
Samstag, 28. Februar 2009 at 18:10, Kertész Vilmos wrote:
IMAP in thunderbird 3 beta made several improvements.
I can not see if it is getting better or different.
And why do we read it here?
Why do you ask for something you
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Christian Grams i...@grams-it.com wrote:
You miss the point: Ritlabs does not seem to care that paying customers are
leaving for better Emails Clients that have working IMAP.
Better IMAP has been promissed for as long as i can thinkand remember.
BTW: this
21 matches
Mail list logo
