Re: test - Please Ignore

Hello Maxim, Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 3:13:03 PM, you wrote: > Hello Shemming, > won't ignore! ;-) Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course -- Best regards, Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Friday, October 15, 2004, 2:20:32 PM, you wrote: > Testing auto refreshing VFs. One of my VFs set to show messages sent by > me didn't catch my last message to tbbeta until manually refreshed. I'll > see if the same thing happens again. Thank you for your email. It will be act

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:41:09 PM, you wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:32, Marcus Ohlström wrote: >> Meanwhile, I guess I'll go back to the release version, I never >> thought I would be this dependent on VFs... > Back to 3.0.1.33 and my VFs are working again, good

Re: Test

Hello Boris, Friday, October 15, 2004, 5:56:39 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, > Friday, October 15, 2004, 17:15 you wrote at > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] My VF set to use advanced filtering looking for colour groups does NOT auto refresh. >>> After which action VF should be updated? I

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Friday, October 15, 2004, 3:27:45 PM, you wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2004, 17:15, Marcus Ohlström wrote: >> When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not list >> newly received messages matching the search criteria. > I am sorry for this maybe confusing

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Friday, October 15, 2004, 3:36:25 PM, you wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2004, 17:27, Marcus Ohlström wrote: >> What I didn't notice earlier was that as soon as I viewed the message >> in my TBBETA folder, the count of my VF increased, just as it should >> have done when the me

Re: Test

Hello 9Val, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:42:03 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, MO>> OK, if no one else can confirm, I guess it's time to wait for a word MO>> from 9Val. > There are some optimizations in message change notifications, so seems > like sometimes that notifications are lost at al

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:47:52 PM, you wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:42, 9Val wrote: MO>>> OK, if no one else can confirm, I guess it's time to wait for a MO>>> word from 9Val. >> There are some optimizations in message change notifications, so >> seems like somet

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:32:55 PM, you wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:20, Boris Anders wrote: >>> Strange, as I said, I can reproduce on two different machines (both >>> running W2K, but I suspect this isn't OS dependent). >> I don't think either. But maybe? I'm ru

Re: Test

Hello Boris, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:20:28 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, > Friday, October 15, 2004, 23:06 you wrote at > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] When receiving a message. The problem seems to be the VF does not list newly received messages matching the search criteria. >>> Can'

Re: Test

Hello 9Val, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:42:48 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, MO>> 9Val, any ideas? > Have responsed twice already ;) Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course -- Best regards, Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: Test

Hello 9Val, Friday, October 15, 2004, 9:41:18 PM, you wrote: > Hello Boris, BA>> I don't think either. But maybe? I'm running WinXP SP1. But AFAIK 9Val BA>> has done something with updating (to get manual refiltering of a lot BA>> of messages quicker) - this maybe causes your problem? > It

Re: Test

Hello MAU, Friday, October 15, 2004, 10:35:54 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, >> For me it broke when switching to 3.0.2.1. Can you please install this >> version to give it a try? You could always go back afterwards. > I'll give a try tomorrow, OK? Thank you for your email. It will be act

Re: Test

Hello MAU, Saturday, October 16, 2004, 11:26:02 AM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, >>> Yes, 14 CGs at the moment. And yes, I do have a number of VFs >>> filtering on some of them and everything seems to work fine here. >>> However, please note that I have not upgraded/downgraded ;-) to >>> 3.0.2.1

Re: Test

Hello Marcus, Saturday, October 16, 2004, 11:30:22 AM, you wrote: > On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 13:26, MAU wrote: >> Your is a reply to me. >> It was properly coloured by incoming filter and my "To Me" VF was >> properly updated with no need to refresh it. > Strang

Re: Test

Hello MAU, Saturday, October 16, 2004, 11:43:01 AM, you wrote: > Hello Marcus, >> Strange. If 9Val doesn't succeed in fixing this in the upcoming beta, >> I guess I should try a reinstall. If I couldn't reproduce on my second >> PC, I would already have done a reinstall. As I said, time to wai

Re: Testing Scheduled items

Hello Michael, Monday, October 18, 2004, 4:46:23 AM, you wrote: > TB BETA ERS, > I would like to test the scheduled items I have setup without changing > the time. I understand that I can change the time to a minute from > now, but a simple - run now command would be great. Thank you for

Re: [IGNORE] Test

Hello Christian, Monday, October 18, 2004, 8:22:44 AM, you wrote: > Just a test for the subscription to the listing! :) Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course -- Best regards, Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: Where to get latest betas

Hello Chris, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 5:30:14 AM, you wrote: > Hello All, > I got mine from betanews.com but why is the 3.0.2.1 not listed on > ritlabs the bat! beta site? How did they get on betanews if it's > not public beta? Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due cour

Re: Where to get latest betas

Hello John, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:49:28 PM, you wrote: > cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version? For some > reason I've noticed you all using a version later than the one that is > on the "official beta page" on Ritlabs. > I swear I have never experienced software th

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Where to get latest betas)

Hello Marck, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:52:24 PM, you wrote: > Dear John, > @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick: NA>>> Instead now they've chosen to go with one URL at the time of NA>>> release for some reason. JM>> _

Re: Where to get latest betas

Hello Peter, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 11:04:16 AM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > on Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:30:14 -0400GMT, you wrote: C>> I got mine from betanews.com but why is the 3.0.2.1 not listed on C>> ritlabs the bat! beta site? How did they get on betanews if it's C>> not public beta? >

Re: Where to get latest betas

Hello Nick, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 1:16:53 PM, you wrote: > On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, at 6:14:40 AM, Chris wrote: >> I got mine from betanews.com but why is the 3.0.2.1 not listed on >> ritlabs the bat! beta site? > I wondered as well, because for the longest time you could find

Re: Where to get latest betas

Hello Marck, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:54:35 PM, you wrote: > Dear John, > @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick: JM>> cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version? > Peter Meyns already did in this very thr

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Where to get latest betas)

Hello Marck, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:52:13 PM, you wrote: > Dear John, > @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick: JM>> cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version? > > Note: This moderator's interjection i

Re: Test

Hello Thomas, Friday, October 29, 2004, 4:05:34 PM, you wrote: > Hello Thomas, > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:00:24 +0700 GMT (29/10/2004, 23:00 +0700 GMT), > Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF>> !29/10/2004, 22:58:53: SEND - Server reports error. The TF>> response is: 5.7.0 {mp011} Sender address does no

Re: Beta testing (was: Re: 3022 is awfull)

Hello Roelof, Thursday, October 28, 2004, 9:27:03 PM, you wrote: > Hallo MaXxX, > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:55:34 +0200GMT (28-10-2004, 19:55 +0200, where > I live), you wrote: M>> I'm asking for a way to make betatesting easier, as it was for the M>> short time between introducing the /REG para

Re: Test

Hello Thomas, Friday, October 29, 2004, 4:00:24 PM, you wrote: > Hello TBBETA, > The reason for this test is that I get the following error message > when trying to send another message: > !29/10/2004, 22:58:53: SEND - Server reports error. The response > is: 5.7.0 {mp011} Sender address doe

Re: IMAP: new revision

> Can anyone else confirm these pauses in smooth browsing of messages? Yes, but because this has always been my experience of TB's IMAP working I hadn't noticed a further slowing of message collection - but I think you're right about this, Allie. -- Regards Clive Taylor Usi

Re: The Bat! 3.0.1 Beta cycle finished

> We need to be able to have only the message body be downloaded upon > selection. Leave the attachments for only when they're selected for > saving or viewing. I'd second that. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.1.33 __

Re: Wrapped .33

bout other postings here today; sorry if they've been misinterpreted. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.1.33 Current beta is 3.0.1.33 RC/10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Wrapped .33

to annoy people in this list. Perhaps I ought to rejoin TBOT before I get trouted for this. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.1.33 Current beta is 3.0.1.33 RC/10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/T

Re: Wrapped .33

> LOL Did you not notice the Smiley? I wasn't referring to you, Mary, as I suspect you know. I'm allergic to smileys (and those horrible :: things too, I'm afraid) so that's why I subconsciously blotted out the wretched thing! -- Regards Clive T

Re: Wrapped .33

> So, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I have > received is an on-line scolding. :) My, isn't there a lot of bad temper around today, Mary? Must be the weather or something. -- Regards Clive Taylor U

Re: 3.0.1 RC6 is now available

demonstrating its IMAP pedigree well. Ain't life strange! -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.1 RC5 Current beta is 3.0.1 RC/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To r

Re: IMAP Client Decisions (Was: Re: 3.0.1 RC6 is now available)

> On the other hand, Mulberry also has some serious deficiencies that > are not being addressed, or are being addressed too slowly for my > taste. I understand v4 is being actively developed and hopefully will address some of the wishes people have (some users have real problems with slow connecti

Re: 3.0.1 RC6 is now available

ut the (admittedly small) sum I spent on the v3 upgrade to TB. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.1 RC5 Current beta is 3.0.1 RC/7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To reg

Re: OT: Test

Hello Clive, Monday, September 6, 2004, 5:00:38 PM, you wrote: > Hello Lars, > Monday, September 6, 2004, 9:56:02 AM, you wrote: >> Last one, promised > Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course -- Best

Re: OT: Test

Hello Lars, Monday, September 6, 2004, 9:56:02 AM, you wrote: > Last one, promised Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course -- Best regards, Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current b

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists (TBUDL, TBBETA and TBTECH), effective as of now. Allie Sorry to see you step down. Your contribution to these lists has been a significant factor in developing a 'feel-good' factor about TB for me. Your advice has been spot-on and I adm

Re:memory leaks in thebat! ??

> However, they need to send a message that IMAP implementation will not > be a strong point in this program I think they have, Ethan. There's absolutely no mention of TB's IMAP capability in the description of TB on Ritlab's website. -- regards Clive Ta

Re:memory leaks in thebat! ??

m concerned IMAP under TB is awful and stressful, IMAP using Thunderbird or Mulberry works well. Period. -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.10.01 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/the

Re:IMAP and log panel

s the only answer to this one on this machine :( -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.03 Beta/45 Current beta is 2.03 Beta/47 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register a

Re:IMAP Not Functioning

traightforward, reliable, intuitive IMAP operation, I'd pay for it. I use it to sort out the mess that TB makes of my IMAP structure! Isn't that an indictment? -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.03 Beta/45 Current beta

IMAP deletion

This is driving me nuts. If I shift-delete a message from the IMAP server it goes into the trash folder OK, BUT it turns to unread and the mail ticker starts although I’ve unticked the box every time I’ve started TB. Is this new behaviour or a trick I haven’t noticed before! -- regards Clive

Re:IMAP problems

to work fine after I restarted TB though. Does the same here. I've now given up using IMAP with TB until the issues that concern me are resolved. -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.00 Current beta is 2.00 | "Using TBB

TB2.0 Final: Still missing folders!!!

made just before upgrading. Not funny for a few minutes. -- Regards Clive Taylor Current beta is 2.00 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: Message not displaying in RTV

Hello Eddie, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 10:39:01 AM, you wrote: EC> Unfortunately I see it very strange. you can see my Screen Shot. Is it EC> this what is meant? I had exactly this problem with this message -- I'm using TB 1.62i. I've never seen anything like this; it picked up half a message

<    1   2   3