d a Empty Folder. But I think TB!
people now have well enough information to review the problem by
themselves and fix it without me debugging the imap commands and
sequences they use. ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
_
Hello Allie,
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:24:03 -0500, you wrote:
> On 18/10/2004 at 9:02:29 AM, Olivier Mascia, [OM] wrote:
>> Well. Then it might be related to my setting of "compress folders when
>> switching to another folder". When I Empty Folder, the message list
>&g
Hello Allie,
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:54:58 -0500, you wrote:
> On 18/10/2004 at 8:28:54 AM, Olivier Mascia, [OM] wrote:
>> Do you also confirm that the 'Empty Folder' through a right-click on
>> the folder name do remove all parked messages as well, while
>> deleting
Hello Allie,
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:13:00 -0500, you wrote:
> On 18/10/2004 at 7:59:33 AM, Olivier Mascia, [OM] wrote:
>> PS: Allie, I have used IMAP for years (and I just don't mean 2 or 3 by
>> writing this) and never had my hands back on POP for the same time.
>> Your
Hello Allie,
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:07:37 -0500, you wrote:
> On 18/10/2004 at 6:05:41 AM, Olivier Mascia, [OM] wrote:
>> I just had "Empty Folder" delete eveything this morning, including
>> parked messages.
> Hmmm. IMAP doesn't understand parking, even though o
I can reproduced at will. Right-Click on a
folder in the folders list, 'Empty Folder' deletes all messages,
including those parked.
--
Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
allows
me to continue with removal, leaving the parked messages in place,
cancel or delete everything.
Having that same kind of proposal when using the "Empty Folder" action
seems obvious for me.
Are there reasons to disagree ?
--
Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.
time should be PM (around 19:00 PM).
Done.
> Could you please report the result?
No. I don't know what you fixed, so cannot report. ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v3.0.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
__
will draft a clear
description of this later. I'll have to dig through the faq, known
bugs, and wish-lists first: I guess some similar request has already
been made.
Yours,
--
Cordialement,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.15 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Serv
Hello,
It looks like that when I check Privacy - Encrypt when completed and
then click on Send the Letter, nothing happens. The composition window
is still open, the message is not sent. Nothing happened.
When using Privacy - Sign when completed, everything works fine.
--
Best regards,
Olivier
violation with
such and messages stay in the Outbox.
Is your sent item an IMAP folder or not ?
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/5 and IMAP accounts
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current beta is 2
mend it as a complete
mail server on Windows platform. There are much more than
POP/SMTP/IMAP around this product.
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/4 and IMAP accounts
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
for *all* threads). But '*' has the same
'just one level' behaviour as '+'... Bug in this beta 2.0 or something
else ?
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 (Only IMAP accounts)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
___
st its IMAP support I would
have seen immediately a problem there, if there was. As some of these
"_" folders are those I use most ("_" in front to have them sort
before others).
My IMAP server is MDaemon Pro 6.8.5 from Alt-N (http://www.altn.com).
--
Best regards,
compress function.
As soon as I see such deleted messages re-appearing in the message
list, I hit ESC key and they re-disappear again.
So TB recognizes the \Deleted messages as such in most cases, but
sometimes mistakenly misses them.
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v2.0
if I first type the paragraph on the left, then want to
indent it, I don't find a way to do it. I'm sure I must be missing a
trivial trick to do it. Which one ?
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 and IMAP accounts
on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Serv
ead views as well.
Indeed, it looks like it works very well. The real trick was to get
that by modifying a folder set to *use* the default, you actually
*update* the default.
Next step : would there be a quick trick to tag all my folders to use
the default (got to edit properties of more
test it, but for now, the behaviour makes it very uneasy to reliably
check mails.
Thanks !
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 (Only IMAP accounts)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current beta is 2.0b1 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
flag. Could it be possible to make the
JA> behavior consistent?
Regarding IMAP at least, I prefer the delete operation to just mark
\Deleted. I don't really like the idea of having a delete also tag it
as read (which it isn't).
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
Using The Bat! v2
on folders to keep mail in and, ATM, incoming mail
SH> is automagically sorted by my filters. I understand that auto
SH> filtering of incoming messages currently doesn't work. Can I manually
SH> filter?
Yes.
SH> Will auto filtering work soon? (I guess only the developers can
S
been deleted.
So it looks okay, but everything on screen makes you first believe it
failed. Right clicking a message and choosing Move does not exhibit this
same behaviour.
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service P
*' does that for all threads and so '*' or
'+' alone does the same thing. But okay, fine. I'm sorry the beta does
not include the beta of the help file !
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 (Only IMAP accounts)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service P
nt before won't be "Recent"
anymore. If the disconnection / reconnection is for technical reasons
out of the control or will of the user, supporting "Recent" flag becomes
really tricky. This is one of the reasons it is often not supported (or
not well supported) in I
press * or even ctrl-*, but I thought there should be some
setting somewhere to have it do it automatically. Couldn't find. Is this
a bug or a missing feature ?
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 (Only IMAP accounts)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service P
Hello,
It looks like most (but not all) my outgoing messages stick to the
outbox though they sent successfully at first. Reprocessing the outbox
actually then send duplicates. I checked the SMTP server log (which I
control) and nothing in the session log seems abnormal so that it could
have tricke
to mention that
I have NO accounts other than IMAP ones. I will update my SIG for the
next messages.
--
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 (IMAP Account)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current beta is 2.0b1
alert eye to
this list and jump in for some more testing later. For POP3 connected
people, The Bat! stays, in my very personal opinion, far above all
others including that Becky. But for IMAP, it has to learn (and will do
I'm sure :-) !
Yours
ries to
download more messages than reported available by the mail server.
This is clearly seen at the server side in the MDaemon log files.
Best Regards,
- --
Olivier Mascia, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIP Group S.A., www.tipgroup.com
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-1 (MingW32)
Comment
28 matches
Mail list logo