9Val and Matt,
> Changing combination doesn't take place for already synchronized
> messages (workaround - clear cache). BTW, TB! should ask you to
> download such attachment if you'll try to use it. BTW2, does 'Reload
> message' help?
YES!! On the older messages it does and I just
On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 @ 9:54:40 AM [-0700], Matt Thoene wrote:
> I am still getting the random empty message, 0 byte size, with headers
> only on my IMAP accounts. I have confirmed that I can see the same
> messages just fine with alternate IMAP clients.
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php
Hello Neal,
Sorry for previous message, it was accident of my fingers :-
)
NL> Headers/Text+Headers but I've tried every other combination, too with
NL> the same result.
Changing combination doesn't take place for already synchronized
messages (workaround - clear cache). BTW, TB! s
Hello Neal,
NL> Headers/Text+Headers but I've tried every other combination, too with
NL> the same result. Understand while I know what we are talking about
NL> here, I am not a veteran IMAP user and have only been dealing with one
NL> account for about 6 months now. At the office I use Thunderb
Hi 9Val
> Hello Neal,
NL>> Oh yeah - bigtime. All attachments are 0 bytes.
> Do you use Headers/Text+Headers synchronization? Or retrieving only
> text while browsing enabled?
Headers/Text+Headers but I've tried every other combination, too with
the same result. Understand while I know wha
On Wednesday, April 13, 2005 @ 5:34:11 AM [-0700], 9Val wrote:
MT>> Are there any Ritlabs folks able to tell us anything about this? Any
MT>> chance this gets looked at before the next beta release?
> Can you send source of that message? I mean source, which was
> retrieved by TB!
Do yo
Hello Matt,
MT> Are there any Ritlabs folks able to tell us anything about this? Any
MT> chance this gets looked at before the next beta release?
Can you send source of that message? I mean source, which was
retrieved by TB!
BTW, I suppose it can be related with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Neal,
NL> Oh yeah - bigtime. All attachments are 0 bytes.
Do you use Headers/Text+Headers synchronization? Or retrieving only
text while browsing enabled?
--
9Val
Current beta is
hey Martin
> I haven't seen this since I started uses the 3.0.9.x beta series. What
> IMAP Fine-Tune options do you have?
Any combination gives me either 0 or a <1K byte count no matter what
combinations of options. Another thing interesting is that some .doc's
are 0 while others are less that 10
Hello Matt,
On 12 April 2005, 22:20 you wrote:
I am still getting the random empty message, 0 byte size, with headers
only on my IMAP accounts. I have confirmed that I can see the same
messages just fine with alternate IMAP clients.
>> I haven't seen this since I started uses the
On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 @ 12:41:43 PM [-0700], Martin Webster on tbbeta
wrote:
>>> I am still getting the random empty message, 0 byte size, with headers
>>> only on my IMAP accounts. I have confirmed that I can see the same
>>> messages just fine with alternate IMAP clients.
>>> Still a HUGE
Hello Neal,
On 12 April 2005, 20:21 you wrote:
>> I am still getting the random empty message, 0 byte size, with headers
>> only on my IMAP accounts. I have confirmed that I can see the same
>> messages just fine with alternate IMAP clients.
>> Still a HUGE issue. Anyone else seeing this?
I ha
Hi Matt
> I am still getting the random empty message, 0 byte size, with headers
> only on my IMAP accounts. I have confirmed that I can see the same
> messages just fine with alternate IMAP clients.
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4310 <---submitted on 3/16/05
> Still a HUGE issue. An
I am still getting the random empty message, 0 byte size, with headers
only on my IMAP accounts. I have confirmed that I can see the same
messages just fine with alternate IMAP clients.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4310 <---submitted on 3/16/05
Still a HUGE issue. Anyone else seeing th
14 matches
Mail list logo
