1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Dear All, Here is a new Beta at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html , it is primarily for those who had problems with the mentioned bugs :-) Direct download URL is http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb154b19.rar [-] IMAP/exit bug should be finally solved [-] Bug with forwarding a

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Stefan, On 21 Dec 2001 at 17:28:45 you wrote (at least in part): ST> Here is a new Beta Damn ... there are times you guy are _really_ fast :-) C'mon ... it's hard to follow you and test with this short cycles *ggg* .. But don't stop!!! It's OK!!! :- We'll manage it somehow *ggg* Thx

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Marc van Breemen
Hello Stefan, 21 Dec 2001, 17:28:45, you wrote: ST> [*] Delays in the Message finder Sorry, but it's still there. I made a test folder with 16 messages that each containt two lines of text and one large attachment of 6 MB. A search for a text in this folder (only 'body') takes 20 seconds. With

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Jonas Koopmann
Hello Stefan, > Here is a new Beta at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html , it is > primarily for those who had problems with the mentioned bugs :-) Thanks, but download is extremly slow. Only 7.0 KB/s with DSL, other servers do 120 KB/s and more. -- Best regards Jonas Koopmann using T

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread George M. Menegakis
21 Dec 2001, 18:28:45, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Dear All, > Here is a new Beta at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html , it is > primarily for those who had problems with the mentioned bugs :-) > Direct download URL is > http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb154b19.rar > [-] IMAP

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Dirk Heiser
est this on beta/19 yet, but the last time is see this was monday with beta/17 or 16 i guess, so if you have allready fixed this please forget this bug report). cu, Dirk -- Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/19 (S/N 12A1F196 / Educational) under Windows 95 4.0 Bu

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-22 Thread Dirk Heiser
ack background. cu, Dirk -- Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/19 (S/N 12A1F196 / Educational) under Windows 95 4.0 Build 67109975 B -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMA

Re: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-22 Thread Alain de Gevigney
e default' choose in it's popup. Regards, Alain [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! 1.54 Beta/19 Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.d

Re[2]: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Eric Malausséna
Bonjour Marc, Le vendredi 21 décembre 2001 à 17:47:32, vous écriviez : ST>> [*] Delays in the Message finder MvB> Sorry, but it's still there. I made a test folder with 16 messages MvB> that each containt two lines of text and one large attachment of 6 MB. MvB> A search for a text in this folde

Re[3]: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Marc van Breemen
Hello Eric, 21 Dec 2001, 18:04:49, you wrote: EM> Within 11 accounts and about 1300 messages, searching one word returns EM> 300 messages and takes about 8 seconds ! EM> For me... it's OK ! I'm very glad and/or for you ;). But I have a message base of aprox. 3000 messages. You're right that Th

Re[4]: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-21 Thread Boris Golberg
Hello, 21 Dec 2001, 11:10:25 AM, Marc van Breemen wrote: EM>> Within 11 accounts and about 1300 messages, searching one word returns EM>> 300 messages and takes about 8 seconds ! MvB> I'm very glad and/or for you ;). But I have a message base of aprox. MvB> 3000 messages. You're right that The

Re[2]: 1.54 Beta/19

2001-12-22 Thread Anton I. Danilov
22.12.2001, Home > [+]For finish, could you please send us wich "commmand line" used > for backup accounts. (for "Planned task") Yes! That's absolutely needed. -- Anton I. Danilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://savara.time-out.ru/ ICQ: 18759663 -- __

Re: Why large attachments (was: 1.54 Beta/19)

2001-12-22 Thread Anton I. Danilov
22.12.2001, Home >> 2. Why would you store *huge* peace of data using mail >> client (and specially *inside* its mail database), which is >> *not* optimized for it instead of using some database engine? > Good question. BY THE WAY! People... Why not asking the Bat! developers to ad

Re[2]: Why large attachments (was: 1.54 Beta/19)

2001-12-22 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Anton, On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:07:14 +0300 (22.12.2001 13:07 my local time) you wrote about "Why large attachments (was: 1.54 Beta/19)", at least in part: AID> People... Why not asking the Bat! developers to adapt Bat for working AID> with, say, SQL dat