Hello Rick,
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:28:56 -0400 GMT (14/Jun/09, 7:28 +0700 GMT),
Rick wrote:
R I meant bad HTML ... there should be NO HTML on this list :)
Testing whether HTML still works...
Has replying been worked on? There seem to have been some issues.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Rick,
Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote:
R I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I
R thought it was because everyone was still in tar and feather Ritlabs over
IMAP mode. Perhaps not.
I received another one today in which your email-address
Hello Rick,
Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote:
R I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I
R thought it was because everyone was still in tar and feather Ritlabs over
IMAP mode. Perhaps not.
I received another one today in which your
Hello Beta-Bats,
Today, I received a second empty message since using this TB! version.
The first one, from june, 11th was from Rick Grunwald for Tbbeta.
Except for the headers, absolutely nothing could be seen, the second one was in
another group; the latter was an html message where the
Hello Mark,
Today, I received a second empty message since using this TB! version.
The first one, from june, 11th was from Rick Grunwald for Tbbeta.
Except for the headers, absolutely nothing could be seen, the second one was
in
another group; the latter was an html message where the
Today, I received a second empty message since using this TB! version.
The first one, from june, 11th was from Rick Grunwald for Tbbeta.
Except for the headers, absolutely nothing could be seen, the second one was
in
another group; the latter was an html message where the headers and the
Hello,
Citing myself once more:
MP Today, I received a second empty message since using this TB! version.
MP The first one, from june, 11th was from Rick Grunwald for Tbbeta.
MP Except for the headers, absolutely nothing could be seen, the second one
was in
MP another group; the latter was an
Hello Rick,
Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote:
R I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I
R thought it was because everyone was still in tar and feather Ritlabs over
IMAP mode. Perhaps not.
I can't say what the subject was (not mentioned
Probably bad or damaged html-code
On this list?
--
Rick
The art of being wise is knowing what to overlook. - William James
v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Rick,
Sunday, June 14, 2009, 2:03:02 AM, you wrote:
R On this list?
I would have used this instead of that then... :-)
,--/ \
| in that group
`-8---
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 4.2.1.1
MyMacros 1.11a
zOmbie's Macros
Hello Rick,
Sunday, June 14, 2009, 2:03:02 AM, you wrote:
R On this list?
I would have used this instead of that then... :-)
,--/ \
| in that group
`-8---
I meant bad HTML ... there should be NO HTML on this list :)
--
Rick
Second star to the right, and straight on
Hi all,
when will this be fixed? I still keep getting those empty mails. See
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6704
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v4.0.24.8 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600,
AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM
I frequently receive spam from these known spam sites:
http://200.187.137.10 and http://200.187.137.3
The messages are never sent from these adresses but they all have in common that they
only contain a html attachment that looks something like this:
htmlbodya
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 1:51:27 PM, Mogens Holst has created
a mail:
Is is possible to filter on the content of the html part?
Or on RAW DATA, perhaps?
That'd be really nice. The whole message, headers, raw body,
everything, not even uu-decoded or anything.
One vote from me. Next!
14 matches
Mail list logo
