Re: IMAP: Improved with 3.63.14

2005-12-19 Thread Curtis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Peter, You wrote: > C> Not seeing any hung processes here. If TB! hasn't been started up > for C> a while, it does take TB! a while to sort itself out and > update with C> the server. > > Yes. _That_ also takes too long, IMO, as the who

Re: IMAP: Improved with 3.63.14

2005-12-19 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Curtis, On 19-12-2005 12:42, you [C] wrote in : C> Not seeing any hung processes here. If TB! hasn't been started up for C> a while, it does take TB! a while to sort itself out and update with C> the server. Yes. _That_ also takes too long, IMO, as the whole program is unresponsive. C> However,

Re: IMAP: Improved with 3.63.14

2005-12-19 Thread Curtis
On 19/12/2005 at 3:27:25 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: > The new queue does appear to work well here (have just been using it for > 2 hours) for fetching mail and fortunately the AVs I got as clockwork in > the last 2-3 betas have yet to appear. I do still see hanging tasks - > like "Scan

Re: IMAP: Improved with 3.63.14

2005-12-19 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Curtis, On 19-12-2005 03:31, you [C] wrote in : C> Am I the only one noting that the duplicates have finally disappeared C> and that the folder count issues are also improved? The new queue does appear to work well here (have just been using it for 2 hours) for fetching mail and fortunately the A

IMAP: Improved with 3.63.14

2005-12-18 Thread Curtis
Hi all, Am I the only one noting that the duplicates have finally disappeared and that the folder count issues are also improved? I can actually use this one it would seem. I've been using it all day without significant difficulties. For some reason, I'm having large attachments not being left on