> On the other hand, Mulberry also has some serious deficiencies that
> are not being addressed, or are being addressed too slowly for my
> taste.
I understand v4 is being actively developed and hopefully will address
some of the wishes people have (some users have real problems with
slow connecti
Hi, Clive.
--On Monday, October 11, 2004 3:54 PM +0100 Clive Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've crossed this bridge, Keith. Although I miss some of TB's
features, rock-solid, fast IMAP performance is more important to me
for my domain mail and I don't regret a penny I spent on a licence for
M
2 matches
Mail list logo
