Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Dear Paul, @17-Nov-2004, 13:40 -0500 (17-Nov 18:40 UK time) Paul Van Noord [PVN] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: >>I don't understand what you mean by this? PVN> It is necessary for me to read all the redundant messages to be PVN> certain something is new or different. It is necessary f

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Hello Paul, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 10:40:38 AM, you wrote: > However, if the tone is to repeat, repeat, repeat the same > information or make cute remarks I may need to unsubscribe and spend > time someplace more informative. I may be way out of line here but... In the years I have been

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Received From: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul, Please do no include your reply after a (-- ) + new line. This way it is automatically removed on reply. The (-- ) is a signature delimiter. Try to reply to your own message (in TB!) to see what happens. On 17-11-2004 18:20, you [PVN] wrote

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Hello Paul, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 10:20:04 AM, you wrote: Paul> I did not realize it takes 15 swats with a sledge hammer by Paul> several people to pound a single carpet tack. Why wasn't there a Paul> welcoming message explaining the rules? There was. When someone subscribes they are alw

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Paul, Please do no include your reply after a (-- ) + new line. This way it is automatically removed on reply. The (-- ) is a signature delimiter. Try to reply to your own message (in TB!) to see what happens. On 17-11-2004 18:20, you [PVN] wrote in : PVN> I did not realize

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Received From: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul, On 17-11-2004 17:20, you [PVN] wrote in : PVN> I am ready to receive something of substance. I never cease to be PVN> amazed at how much effort is given to the insignificant. With this attitude I doubt anyone will give

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Paul, On 17-11-2004 17:20, you [PVN] wrote in : PVN> I am ready to receive something of substance. I never cease to be PVN> amazed at how much effort is given to the insignificant. With this attitude I doubt anyone will give you something of substance. The list rules are n

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter (was: test gmail retr)

Received From: Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Paul, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 7:43:31 PM, you wrote: P> Thanks for fixing my ignorance! I never knew TLS and SSL were P> synonymous! You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the same issues. Note: This moderator's interject

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter (was: test gmail retr)

Hello Stuart, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 8:36:19 AM, you wrote: Gregory>> You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the Gregory>> same issues. S> Is that a record? I don't believe so, but I could be wrong. -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter (was: test gmail retr)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregory> You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the same Gregory> issues. Is that a record? - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.3, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1