Hi Avi
Depending on one's upbringing, some words will be either rude or blatantly
offensive, while a different culture may consider the same words nothing
special.
My personal opinion, FWIW, is that cultural expectations go far beyond what is
or isn't considered appropriate
Howdy Avi,
Friday, June 24, 2005, 5:21:51 AM, Avi wrotened:
AY So, if we are going to be consistent here, then maybe the New
AY Testament should be a banned book so far as this forum is concerned,
AY because there is so much
AY dirty language in it.
Please I dislike reading racist and sexist
On 6/26/05, Ben Allen wrote:
Friday, June 24, 2005, 5:21:51 AM, Avi wrotened:
AY So, if we are going to be consistent here, then maybe the New
AY Testament should be a banned book so far as this forum is concerned,
AY because there is so much
AY dirty language in it.
Please I dislike
On Sunday, June 26, 2005 at 1:00:17 PM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote:
It's not good enough to include the line please don't feel singled
out in a moderator message when in fact the moderator is clearly
singling someone out.
IMO ... enough already. Are we here to make trouble???
--
-=
Howdy Avi,
Sunday, June 26, 2005, 7:00:17 PM, Avi wrotened:
AY On 6/26/05, Ben Allen wrote:
Friday, June 24, 2005, 5:21:51 AM, Avi wrotened:
AY So, if we are going to be consistent here, then maybe the New
AY Testament should be a banned book so far as this forum is concerned,
AY because
On 6/26/05, Ben Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AY On 6/26/05, Ben Allen wrote:
Friday, June 24, 2005, 5:21:51 AM, Avi wrotened:
AY So, if we are going to be consistent here, then maybe the New
AY Testament should be a banned book so far as this forum is concerned,
AY because there is so
On 6/26/05, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not good enough to include the line please don't feel singled
out in a moderator message when in fact the moderator is clearly
singling someone out.
IMO ... enough already. Are we here to make trouble???
Are we here to make trouble?
Dear Avi,
@26-Jun-2005, 21:51 +0300 (26-Jun 19:51 UK time) Avi Yashar [AY] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie:
IMO ... enough already. Are we here to make trouble???
AY Are we here to make trouble? Absolutely not. At least I know that
AY I am not here for that purpose.
AY Is it enough
On 6/26/05, Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AY Is it enough already? I don't know. I think that depends a bit on
AY Marck, and I don't mean Marck the Moderator.
On me? Well, I've let this one ramble on a bit... as Marck the Mod.
It's been interesting but really belongs on the OT
Hello Avi,
Sunday, June 26, 2005, 1:44:57 PM, you wrote:
If that person has broken the list rules then they require reminding
of said rules but the mods are usually remind the whole list of the
rules in order to stop repeated breaking of the rules by other people
apart from those who
On 6/27/05, hggdh wrote:
Agreed with reservation. I think this can only work if the moderators
are unbiased in respect to whom they single out as whipping boys.
...
Depending on one's upbringing, some words will be either rude or
blatantly offensive, while a different culture may consider
Hello Tony!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
Tony, if you are eating lots of bacon sandwiches, maybe the fight
with the wheel is good exercise. ;)
All I did was try to use a more acceptable phrase to describe what I
was trying to say. The phrase Sweating like a pig seems so
On 6/23/05, Mary Bull wrote:
All I did was try to use a more acceptable phrase to describe what I
was trying to say. The phrase Sweating like a pig seems so uncouth
and we know what Mary's like for couthness :)
No, no! Uncouth is good!
I just only have a religiously-inbred prejudice
--On Thursday, June 23, 2005 12:46 pm -0500 Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just only have a religiously-inbred prejudice against seeing damn
and hell in print.
But I suppose the word heaven is OK? Strange really as both are
fictitious places.
Also CC'd to TBOT... You lot are
--On Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:54 pm +0300 Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
those words don't disturb you?
They do me, seeing them in print does anyway. I can and do use them in
every day language, I'm a Bricklayer so it's hard to get away from them.
Seeing them in print when other
Hello Avi!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 12:54 PM, you wrote:
... and we know what Mary's like for couthness :)
No, no! Uncouth is good!
I just only have a religiously-inbred prejudice against seeing damn
and hell in print. (And other such approaches to taking the name of
the
Hello Tony!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 2:06 PM, you wrote:
those words don't disturb you?
They do me, seeing them in print does anyway. I can and do use them in
every day language, I'm a Bricklayer so it's hard to get away from them.
Seeing them in print when other words will do is another
--On Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:08 pm -0500 Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Vernacular usages, such as sweating like a pig, I am entirely at
home with.
I specifically chose not to use that phrase because I thought it may have
been a bit unsavoury (If you'll excuse the pun) for this
On 6/23/05, Mary Bull wrote:
Are you planning to join me here for fish and parsley, shortly? (I get
the fish and you get the parsley?)
I appreciate the invite - theoretical though it may be - but no
thanks. As far as possible, I try to avoid even witnessing human
carnivororous activity. It
On 6/23/05, Mary Bull wrote:
They do me, seeing them in print does anyway. I can and do use them in
every day language, I'm a Bricklayer so it's hard to get away from them.
Seeing them in print when other words will do is another matter though.
Maybe I'm getting old :)
And they disturb
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 1:09:29 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
They disturb Mary and others here. And they motivate me to go
fishing for the trout of moderation. The veil on the language is
way too thin...
Once again, Saxons get no respect.
(My own roots are Celtic (Manx) but
Hello Avi!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 1:33 PM, you wrote, in part:
But it was really strange for me to see you stating: No, no!
Uncouth is good! and then rambling on about how you only object to
words ... which really don't bother me at all. ...
Uncouth was in the specific context of Tony's
On 6/23/05, Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it was really strange for me to see you stating: No, no!
Uncouth is good! and then rambling on about how you only object to
words ... which really don't bother me at all. ...
Come on, Mary... now you are using an ellipsis to avoid writing
On 6/24/05, Avi Yashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down
to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved
unto judgment; The angels that sinned are the sons of God that had
sex with human females to produce a race
24 matches
Mail list logo
