jueves, 9 abr 2009 at 12:44, it seems you wrote:
I don't think that it is a problem. I think that it is OK. We can
only leave the digits in this column, no grahpics and it will still be OK.
Anyway to write the numbers of attachments in a lower font size?
--
/\/
I don't think that it is a problem. I think that it is OK. We can
only leave the digits in this column, no grahpics and it will still be OK.
Anyway to write the numbers of attachments in a lower font size?
At me the numbers only appears when I click into the list of mails. If
I select a new
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 23:35, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
See attachment
TNX
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.11.12 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin
11.91.0
Windows XP 5.1 build
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, April 9, 2009, 11:53:10 PM, you wrote:
DAC Reminds me of a
DAC kid who doesn't want to go to bed, so keeps thinking of excuses.
DAC Except avoidance is not of bed but of tackling the real problems.
Oh, you're talking about Obamatactics! But isn't that OT?
--
Best
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2009-04-09 · 20:29 h (CET)]
Moin, Jens!
- Choose HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RightAlignFolderCounters
- Set value to 1
Put it in the Wiki :-)
You are a hacker ;-)
No, not really. See mid:1541882940.20080209093...@thebat.net.
Wolfgang S. is the
-Original Message-
From: Martin Schoch dagob...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:44:47
To: Vilitbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
Subject: Re: Number of attachments
Hi Vili
On Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:10:00 PM you wrote:
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems
Hi Ethan
On Friday, April 10, 2009 1:30:16 PM you wrote:
Given the diverse response to the number of attachments column,
can we move on? The point has been made.
Yes, I think so.
--
Best regards,
Martin
dagob...@yahoo.com
TheBat! 4.1.11.12 Pro (no OTFE) on Windows XP 5.1 2600
Hi Kertész
On Friday, April 10, 2009 2:11:05 PM you wrote:
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)...
V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont
V even touch them for a half a year. These kind of stuff will not
V bring revenue, nor
Hello all,
Thursday, April 9, 2009, Vili wrote:
What is useful in it? How often you use it to gather some extra
information by knowing the number of attachments?
for me it is useful when expecting or finding a message, where i know what
numbers message approximately consists.
This could be
This IS a real problem, people cannot send mails if they dont know
the
workaround. It would be USEFUL if this problem would be fixed
instead
of cosmetic changes.
Of course real problems have priority - but cosmetic bugs have to be
solved as well. Do you buy a software which is ugly
Hello Vilius,
Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:53:03 PM, you wrote:
VŠ Real world users doesn't care about ugly interface. They do their work and
VŠ go home.
On the contrary. Most prefer nice looking inferior software.
And as if that was not enough: they go home without doing their work! :-)
--
Common sense. Which is less and less currently. If a client can
download email, useful. If a client has a bug in the SMTP auth window,
useless. Check it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7523
This IS a real problem, people cannot send mails if they dont know the
workaround. It
Hi Vilius
On Friday, April 10, 2009 2:53:03 PM you wrote:
Of course real problems have priority - but cosmetic bugs have to be
solved as well. Do you buy a software which is ugly because of a bad
and buggy layout?
The real world is not digital :-)
Real world users doesn't care about ugly
Oh yes I see, you are using Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 ;-)
At least is has real IMAP support.
--
Vilius
Current beta is 4.1.11.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Friday, April 10, 2009, 16:54:27, Vilius Šumskas wrote:
At least is has real IMAP support.
It does? I'd really like to see this alternate reality Outlook that
has supposedly better IMAP support than The Bat - at my workplace, we
tried all versions of Outlook from 2000 to 2007 SP2 with little
Hi Vili!
Dont forget, this new stuff was introduced BEFORE bugs were solved.
Caused only troubles, needs to spend more energy on solving problems
that would not have been.
I work as a QA guy and as much as I can tell the fact that something was done
instead of fixing a bug, doesn't mean the
Tump raymund.t...@gmx.de
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:28:36
To: tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
Subject: Re: Number of attachments
Hi Vili!
Dont forget, this new stuff was introduced BEFORE bugs were solved.
Caused only troubles, needs to spend more energy on solving problems
that would not have been
Hello Martin,
Friday, April 10, 2009, 10:47:00 AM, you wrote:
Oh yes I see, you are using Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 ;-)
And the shots continue.
Can the moderator please put an end to this.
Maybe the folks with the concerns can take it to another space.
I got the point.
The point has
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 11:00, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Wolfgang S. is the keyword here. You know, Jens? ;-)
---
The Bat!
---
Die Nachricht mit der ID
1541882940.20080209093...@thebat.net
konnte nicht gefunden werden.
Wollen Sie in anderen
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 14:11, Kertész Vilmos wrote:
I always feel that we should add REAL users to the betalist to refresh
the blood.
I am real and i talk for my Customers as well.
I meet with them on a daily basis,
Hopefully i will not meet all my Customers daily :-)
But i see some of
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 15:43, Mark Partous wrote:
On the contrary. Most prefer nice looking inferior software.
Thats only a suggestion, i checked it out and the Users selected the
Software which fits best their needs and is working fast and save.
They dropped fancy software and took the
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 18:28, Raymund Tump wrote:
Could someone please mark it as a dead horse?
+1
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.11.12 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin
Jens Franik wrote on 11/04/2009 at 06:46:34 +1100
subject Number of attachments :
Freitag, 10. April 2009 at 11:00, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Wolfgang S. is the keyword here. You know, Jens? ;-)
---
The Bat!
---
Die Nachricht mit der ID
[Reply to: »Martin Schoch« · 2009-04-09 · 11:38 h (CET)]
Moin, Martin!
But today I got a message with 10 attachments - and see the picture...
Ummm … very nice!
Well I could enlarge the column size - but it's not the solution.
I would suggest …
- … to make this feature optional (as already
[Reply to: »Martin Schoch« · 2009-04-09 · 13:00 h (CET)]
Moin, Martin!
Yes - only digits (right-justified) and no graphic would be a good
solution.
Yep! :-)
BTW. The numbers in the columns Total Messages and Unread
Messages should be right-justified and not left-justified - in my
opinion.
Hi Volker
On Thursday, April 9, 2009 1:19:54 PM you wrote:
Old problem, but here is the solution:
- Close The Bat!
- Run regedit
- Choose HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RightAlignFolderCounters
- Set value to 1
- Close regedit
- Restart The Bat! and you are done. ;-)
Thanks for
[Reply to: »Martin Schoch« · 2009-04-09 · 13:35 h (CET)]
Moin, Martin!
Thanks for the hint ... but here nothing changes - total and unread
messages columns are still left-justified - in the message list pane
- in the folder list pane they are right-justified.
Oh, now I see. The columns
Hello Martin,
Thursday, April 09, 2009, 12:38:19, you wrote:
But today I got a message with 10 attachments - and see the picture...
Well I could enlarge the column size - but it's not the solution.
I don't think that it is a problem. I think that it is OK. We can only leave
the digits in this
Hello Maxim
I don't think that it is a problem. I think that it is OK. We can
only leave the digits in this column, no grahpics and it will still be OK.
Yes - only digits (right-justified) and no graphic would be a good solution.
BTW. The numbers in the columns Total Messages and Unread
Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 at 12:06, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
- … and/or remove the icon in the background of the number. IMO that
icon is needless, because the number itself is an indicator for an
attachment.
Or show the Icon for ONE Attachment and Numbers if they are more
than one.
--
Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 at 13:19, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
- Choose HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RightAlignFolderCounters
- Set value to 1
Put it in the Wiki :-)
You are a hacker ;-)
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue
- … and/or remove the icon in the background of the number. IMO that
icon is needless, because the number itself is an indicator for an
attachment.
Or show the Icon for ONE Attachment and Numbers if they are more
than one.
I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems
Hi Vili,
on Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:02:57 -0400GMT (09.04.2009, 21:02 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
[attachment icon with numbers]
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)...
V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont
V even touch them for a half a
Hi Vili,
on Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:02:57 -0400GMT (09.04.2009, 21:02 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
[attachment icon with numbers]
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)...
V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont
V even touch them for a
Hi Vili
On Thursday, April 9, 2009 9:02:57 PM you wrote:
I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs). I
did not quite follow the thread, but I dont see why showing the number
of attach is useful. Next will be number of words, statistics on of
letters used? Come on, solve
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)...
V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont
V even touch them for a half a year. These kind of stuff will not
V bring revenue, nor rebuild the respect of TB. There are MANY bugs
V that affect the
I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs). I
did not quite follow the thread, but I dont see why showing the number
of attach is useful. Next will be number of words, statistics on of
letters used? Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic
changes. Dont even
Hello Vili,
I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs). I
did not quite follow the thread, but I dont see why showing the number
of attach is useful.
It surely is useful, I does help to keep this list alive with a lot of
discussions. You know, if the feature should be
On Thursday, April 9, 2009, 3:10:00 PM, Vili wrote:
What is useful in it? How often you use it to gather some extra
information by knowing the number of attachments?
I've never gotten more attachments than I could count, usually without
having to take off even one shoe. This feature seems so
On Thursday, April 9, 2009, 3:10:00 PM, Vili wrote:
What is useful in it? How often you use it to gather some extra
information by knowing the number of attachments?
I've never gotten more attachments than I could count, usually without
having to take off even one shoe. This feature seems
Hello Rick,
It also counts the attachments in attached emails.
Wooow! That's great, ain't it! ;-))
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.1.11.12 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
See some of my photos at http://www.Rancho-K.com
Hello Rick,
It also counts the attachments in attached emails.
Wooow! That's great, ain't it! ;-))
I am truly HAPPY that you are so enthused!!! :)
--
Rick
Rogues are preferable to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest. -
Alexandre Dumas
v4.1.11.12 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hi Vili
On Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:10:00 PM you wrote:
V I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)...
V Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont
V even touch them for a half a year. These kind of stuff will not
V bring revenue, nor
43 matches
Mail list logo
