Given the diverse response to the number of attachments column, can we move on? The point has been made.
Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings Principal, The Desk Consulting Group Inc., Oakville, Ontario, Canada. e-mail: je...@thedesk.ca Web: http://www.thedesk.ca Phone: 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776 -----Original Message----- From: Martin Schoch <dagob...@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:44:47 To: Vili<tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com> Subject: Re: Number of attachments Hi Vili On Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:10:00 PM you wrote: >> V>> I think, this is a totally useless new source of problems (bugs)... >> V>> Come on, solve the real issues and leave the cosmetic changes. Dont >> V>> even touch them for a half a year. These kind of stuff will not >> V>> bring revenue, nor rebuild the respect of TB. There are MANY bugs >> V>> that affect the use of TB, this is just another gadget and Ritlabs >> V>> and the beta testers waste energy/time/money on it... >>> I agree with you absolutely on this issue. Thank you for pointing it >>> out. :) >> It was an easy addition and while I wouldn't have asked for it, I am finding >> it useful. It's the kind of cosmetic improvement that can make the Bat more >> saleable. > What is useful in it? How often you use it to gather some extra > information by knowing the number of attachments? Who decides if a feature is useful or not? In my opinion: Exactly this list is a place to *discuss* it - it's not you who *decide* it - I think... Anyway: If Ritlabs implements a feature it should be implemented in a good way - and this contains also a cosmetic view. -- Best regards, Martin dagob...@yahoo.com TheBat! 4.1.11.12 Pro (no OTFE) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.1.11.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.1.11.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
