Re: Re[2]: Adventures with TB

2005-10-11 Thread Gary
Hi Clive, --On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:48 PM +0100 you wrote in part: Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a comparator for IMAP and the Bat? Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it

Re: Re[2]: Adventures with TB

2005-10-11 Thread Clive Taylor
--On 11/10/2005 13:41 -0400 Ethan wrote: Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a comparator for IMAP and the Bat? Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it will continue to function as exp

Re[2]: Adventures with TB

2005-10-11 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Hello Curtis, Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 10:15:18 AM, you wrote: > When I start up Mulberry Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a comparator for IMAP and the Bat? Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings Principal, Curren

Re[2]: Adventures with TB

2005-10-11 Thread Gleason Pace
Clive, >> Mulberry's speed comes from efficiency. You do far more with much less >> transfer of data. TB! is doing too much in the background and requires >> too much data transfer to be productive > I'd buy that. It's the difference in philosophy between a POP and IMAP > developed client, I su