Re[2]: Version 4

2011-06-07 Thread Simon Martin
Title: Re[2]: Version 4 Hi Alto, Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 3:43:17 AM, Tbbeta wrote: > Hi Rick, >> I too still have the exe for version 4 in my prog folder and can >> rename it back if I feel the need. > Are you sure? Wasn't there some issue with the mailbase if you  >

Re[2]: Version 4

2011-06-06 Thread Paul Van Noord
6/6/2011 3:36 PM Hi Rick, On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote: R> They redid the entire program. It has bugs in it. Agreed. Isn't R> this a list for identifying and testing version 5? Sure when it was identified as a beta. The premature release changed the rules. My customers trust me to provide them with

Re[2]: Version 4

2011-06-06 Thread Paul Van Noord
6/6/2011 2:37 PM Hi Rick, On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote: R> OK - some are maintaining v4 for reliability reasons. But isn't R> this a list for identifying and testing version 5? I too still have R> the exe for version 4 in my prog folder and can rename it back if I feel the need. It is a statement

Re[2]: Version 4

2011-06-06 Thread Paul Van Noord
6/6/2011 1:01 PM Hi Rick, On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote: R> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ? Because we have important daily business to conduct that requires an email client without performance/stability issues. - -- Paul The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pr