Re[2]: Very complicated wish (Filters)

Bonjour, Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:57 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> the order of filter is : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and only if 2 doesn't >> match 3 and 4 aren't applied. TF> But that is hierarchical, not chronological. Or am I am still getting TF> you wrong? I do not think so : chr

Re[2]: Very complicated wish (Filters)

Bonjour, Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:36:54 -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- JA> Hash: SHA1 JA> On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Philippe Gouillou wrote... >>Would it be possible to have heritable sub-filters ? JA> Interestingly enough, I proposed the same idea

Re[2]: Very complicated wish (Filters)

Bonjour, Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:45:30 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >>Would it be possible to have heritable sub-filters ? >>In clear, I think it would be easier to manage huge numbers of >>filters (I've spent 2h1/2 on this today) if we could have them >>like that : TF> [snip]