Bonjour,
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:45:30 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> Would it be possible to have heritable sub-filters ?
>> In clear, I think it would be easier to manage huge numbers of
>> filters (I've spent 2h1/2 on this today) if we could have them
>> like that :
TF> [snip]
TF> I like the idea very much. It might be difficult to program, I haven't
TF> thoguht about that yet, just got up and started my first coffee. ;-)
Hum : even after a lot of coffee I'm unable to imagine how to
program it ! :-)
>> and of course a chronological use of filter by the order of
>> lines.
TF> I don't understand this.
I wasn't clear. The idea is that, as it is now, the filters
apply following the orders of lines (1st line = 1st filter)
with, as it is now, an option "Continue processing with other
filters".
The idea is that the hierarchical structure shouldn't have
impact on the order of the filters. In this example :
+- 1
|
+-2
| |
| +-3
| |
| +-4
|
+-5
the order of filter is : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and only if 2 doesn't
match 3 and 4 aren't applied.
A bientôt,
Philippe
Replying with 1.63 Beta/6 on Windows XP 5.1.2600
--
Philippe Gouillou - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CV : http://www.gouillou.com
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 1.63b7 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
