Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 5:45 PM Hi Maxim, On 1/2/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM> Thank you, we will take care of the bug MM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158 Thank You Very Much! -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE __

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 5:22 PM Hi Nick, On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote: ND> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158 ND> Hopefully I didn't botch protocol too awfully bad. Just added my .02. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 4:02 PM Hi Peter, On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote: PO> Hello Paul Van Noord, PO> on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:32:27 -0500 (2007-01-02 21:32:27 in .nl) in the PO> message with reference you PO> [PN] wrote (at least in part): PVN>> It is available at [Other Options]. See Attached. PO> I kn

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 3:59 PM Hi Nick, On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote: ND> But are all the nested menus under there okay? ND> For at least three of us they are out of sync with smart bat functions ND> missing. You are right, Character Sets dialog is missing and the others appear one below where they belong

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 2:51 PM Hi Peter, On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote: PO> Hello Nick Danger, PO> on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:27:02 -0600 (2007-01-02 18:27:02 in .nl) in the PO> message with reference you PO> [ND] wrote (at least in part): ND>> Thanks for any confirmation or lack thereof. PO> Confirmed, th

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 12:35 PM Hi Nick, On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote: ND> Am I the only one that has the Options|Preferences menu acting wacky ND> with everything below "Other options" are out of whack? ND> It's been this way with this and the release previous to this for me. ND> But fine with any version

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2006-12-31 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Guten Morgen, TF> I've never had runtime errors with Voyager. I have - on average about one runtime error every two hours. But I'm delighted to agree that the latest Voyager version is much better here. I've seen errors here, too, but there are so few of them that I can't give a similar "average

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2006-12-30 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/30/2006 10:25 AM Hi Thomas, On 12/30/2006 Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> I've never had runtime errors with Voyager. I also find that the TF> reaction speed depends on the host computer. Neither have I had errors. I find that Win 2K is significantly faster than XP when using USB 2 even when th

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2006-12-30 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/30/2006 10:16 AM Hi MAU, On 12/30/2006 MAU wrote: M> Please do not insist. _I_ want to decide if I want to be protected or M> not. Period. I hear you _and_ I understand. However, you seem to miss the total purpose of Voyager. It grew out of Secure Bat with security as a primary purpose. If

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2006-12-30 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/30/2006 9:22 AM Hi MAU, On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote: M> Aside of that I understand that, when using OTFE, folders (and file M> names?) in disk have 'funny unrecognisable names'. If it is true, I M> don't like that at all. Like using Windows, you gradually get used to it. -- Take Care, Paul V

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2006-12-30 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/30/2006 9:09 AM Hi MAU, On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote: M> Hello Thomas, M>>> I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without M>>> using OTFE? >> >> No, Voyager uses OTFE by default, and it cannot be turned off. M> I don't know why it shouldn't be optional. I hate it when s

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2006-12-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Simon, Thursday, December 28, 2006, 15:53:21, you wrote: >>I've installed over previous version and all appears to be well. Thank you for the prompt reply! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___