Hello TBUDL,
Friday, March 28, 2003, 4:06:55 PM, you wrote:
> I'm thinking of reverting to the current release version to see if
> the hesitation disappears. I know that 1.62i can be installed over
> an older version but what about installing 1.62i over 1.63b7?
Well, in consideration of the
Hello all,
Saturday, March 29, 2003, Quin Selman wrote:
> 3.) I'm thinking of reverting to the current release version to see if
> the hesitation disappears. I know that 1.62i can be installed over
> an older version but what about installing 1.62i over 1.63b7?
In 1.63 beta serie was introd
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, 14:16:48, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Because something new with the way folders are handled was introduced
> with beta/6. And that new feature is buggy and has still not been
> fixed.
Ah. I suspected something like that.
>> I'm waiting for a release version
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
>> It totally messed up my folders, I don't know why.
TF> Because something new with the way folders are handled was introduced
TF> with beta/6. And that new feature is buggy and has still not been
TF> fixed.
I can confirm that it happens with b
Hello Roman,
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 12:22:01 +0100 GMT (29/03/03, 18:22 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
>> what about installing 1.62i over 1.63b7?
> It totally messed up my folders, I don't know why.
Because something new with the way folders are handled was introduced
with beta/6. And that new f
Hi Mark,
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, 12:38:50, Mark Partous wrote:
> Do you really mean that you solely replaced the 1.63B7 with the 1.62
> executable as opposed to reinstall the 1.62?
that's exactly what I did. Luckily however, when I went back to 1.63b7, at
least the folders and the messages c
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, 6:22 AM, you wrote:
>> 3.) I'm thinking of reverting to the current release version to see if
>> the hesitation disappears. I know that 1.62i can be installed over
>> an older version but what about installing 1.62i over 1.63b7?
RK> I tried it, because TB was r
Hello Roman,
Saturday, March 29, 2003, 12:22:01 PM, you wrote:
RK> I went back to the 1.62 executable. Pure horror!
RK> My old folder structure was back. The filters affecting those folders I
RK> had re-arranged were broken. Of course, in those old folders there were no
RK> messages.
RK> So if yo
Hello Ethan,
Saturday, March 29, 2003, 12:21:45 PM, you wrote:
MP>> Unless I'm mistaken, the only thing you have to change is the executable?
EJM> I think the real question is this, " Will the new beta address many of the
EJM> questions raised regarding beta 7". Furthermore, is there a time l
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, 00:06:55, Quin Selman wrote:
> 3.) I'm thinking of reverting to the current release version to see if
> the hesitation disappears. I know that 1.62i can be installed over
> an older version but what about installing 1.62i over 1.63b7?
I tried it, because TB was r
10 matches
Mail list logo
