Re[3]: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Hello Stefan Tanurkov, on Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:59:43 +0200 (2004-01-18 12:59:43 in .nl) in the message with reference you [ST] wrote (at least in part): ST> Well, there is an old idea and think it's now time to ask whether it's ST> good or not (it's a question to ALL, that'

Re: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Hello Stefan, Sunday, January 18, 2004, 5:59:43 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> what do you think about creating a spool directory for each account ST> where the incoming messages are stored before they get into the ST> message base? Having such a directory, it would be possible to put ST> files i

Re[2]: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote: AM>> Are you running anti-virus software that does a POP check. PF> No. I am running MyGate. Bayesit? I'm not having the temp problem you're having and I don't run MyGate or any plugins. So I have to wonder if one of those third party tools/plugins may be interfering

Re: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

On Sunday, January 18, 2004, at 17:10:49 [UTC+0100] (Sunday, January 18, 2004 17:10 my local time) Peter Fjelsten wrote: AM>> Are you running anti-virus software that does a POP check. > No. I am running MyGate. Some users from Poland also observe many thousands of .tmp files with TB/MyGate comb

Re: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Hello Stefan, On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:59:43 +0200 GMT (18/01/2004, 18:59 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > what do you think about creating a spool directory for each account > where the incoming messages are stored before they get into the > message base? I think it's a good idea. :-) -- C

Re: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Allie, On 18-01-2004 15:45, you [AM] wrote in : AM> Are you running anti-virus software that does a POP check. No. I am running MyGate. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 2.03 Beta/31 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ___

Re: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Alexey, On 18-01-2004 15:30, you [ANV] wrote in : ANV> How? The file is still file, whenever it is placed. I think The ANV> Bat! could just create a 'private' folder in the temporary ANV> directory for such purposes, but not make it's own global temp ANV> folder. However the

Re: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Hi Stefan, On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:59:43 +0200 UTC (1/18/2004, 5:59 AM -0600 UTC my time), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: S> Well, there is an old idea and think it's now time to ask whether it's S> good or not (it's a question to ALL, that's why I broke the thread: S> what do you think about creating a s

Re[2]: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote: PF> See my BT note - I've had up to 65000 temp files there - which is so PF> many that WIndows started putting them in the %userroot% folder. Are you running anti-virus software that does a POP check. They're known to interfere with the normal deletion of temp files.

Re[2]: Temp files of The Bat, Mail counter and

Hello, Dierk. You wrote 18.01.2004 @ 20:18 in using mailer The Bat! (v2.03 Beta/40) DH> If I understand this correctly - and many here know, I am not very DH> bright -, you would replace the system's default Temp directory for TB DH> with its own ... DH> Sounds good to