hi,
Saturday, April 22, 2006, 8:34:41 PM, you wrote:
>> the digest vector now is {MsgID, From, To, CC, BCC, Date} if the
>> message has an MsgId and {From, To, CC, BCC, Date, Subject} if it does not have one.
> OK, I feel more comfortable now that I know how the check is made. Am
> I correct
hi,
Saturday, April 22, 2006, 7:54:43 PM, you wrote:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5818
> I write it here: is it possible take the message size into account?
possible, but fairly useless; the same message can travel different paths...
--
regards,
vitalie
Hello Ian,
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 you wrote in
IAW> It is the same and the Condition list box can be shrunk completely.
IAW> It is actually possible to shrink the window so much that even the
IAW> caption of Condition disappears altogether.
Confirmed with XP2 and default theme (or any theme so far
Hi vitalie,
Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:26:14 PM, you wrote:
> the digest vector now is {MsgID, From, To, CC, BCC, Date} if the
> message has an MsgId and {From, To, CC, BCC, Date, Subject} if it does not
> have one.
OK, I feel more comfortable now that I know how the check is made. Am
I correct
Hello Goncalo,
> The problem is when the algorithm doesn't work correctly and a
> Non-Dup is deleted... The way it is now you blindly trust the
> algorithm and don't have any mean to check what was considered a dup.
I dont get it... The algorithm seems to be ok, why not trust
Hello vitalie,
Please dont use HTML, when writing to the list :))
>> Could you provide some information on this feature; how sure can we
>> be/ how can we check that non-duplicates are not being deleted by mistake?
> prior to this, any message that lacks Message-Id was simply ignored
> by the
Hello Peter!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 5:39 PM, you wrote:
> What works here to mess up the General tab:
> 1. resize the Sorting Office window to its smallest allowed size
> 2. maximize the window
> 3. make the Action section as large as possible
> 4. resize the Sorting Office window to its size
Hello Peter!
On Saturday, April 22, 2006, 9:13 AM, you wrote:
PO>> What works here to mess up the General tab:
PO>> 1. resize the Sorting Office window to its smallest allowed size
PO>> 2. maximize the window
PO>> 3. make the Action section as large as possible
PO>> 4. resize the Sorting Office w
Hello 9Val,
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 10:33:26 PM, among other things, you wrote:
9> Here is a short list of changes:
9> [*] dupe killer: take Subject into account if message doesn't have a
9> MsgID
Seems to work well. To my surprise it removed several duplicates from a
folder which
Hello Ian!
On Saturday, April 22, 2006, 8:33 AM, you wrote:
> By the way, I have tried normal fonts and large fonts and with both is
> it possible to shrink the conditions out completely.
I have just done this, and I confirm the bug.
I sent a reply to Peter Ouwehand's
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
just
In reply to :
PO> I like the suggestion to put dupes in the trash, or some other way
PO> to identify dupes and allow the user to make corrections.
I would vote for the creation of a new folder for dupes like the "junk
mail" folder!
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
Planned parenthood --- the im
In reply to :
DAC> On Friday, April 21, 2006, 6:46:00 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
GF Is it possible to put dups in the trash folder?
>>> I think this is a pretty good idea just to make you able to undo.
>> what is the danger of removing a duplicate of something which you
>> still have whe
In reply to :
DAC> On Friday, April 21, 2006, 5:14:13 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
GF>>> Is it possible to put dups in the trash folder?
>> I think this is a pretty good idea just to make you able to undo.
DAC> what is the danger of removing a duplicate of something which you
DAC> still have wh
Peter,
On 22-04-2006 02:05, you [PO] wrote in
:
PO> Not all use something like "Empty trash on exit", I guess.
Exactly!
PO> I like the suggestion to put dupes in the trash, or some other way
PO> to identify dupes and allow the user to make corrections.
Me too.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjels
Hello Bat Tester & everyone else,
on 21-Apr-2006 at 23:48 you (Bat Tester) wrote:
> Try a different theme
He's using the default Luna-blue theme of WinXP... if it doesn't work
there, well...
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
NP: "Celos" by Gotan Project
Hello Ian,
> There is an extra button on the title bar of your Sorting Office. The
M>> one with a down pointed arrow (triangle) about 1 cm to the left of the
M>> Minimise button. Where does it come from? That's not a standard Windows
M>> button, is it?
>
> That is the ATI Catalyst Control Center b
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 6:46:00 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
GF>>> Is it possible to put dups in the trash folder?
>> I think this is a pretty good idea just to make you able to undo.
> what is the danger of removing a duplicate of something which you
> still have where you started?
maybe I sh
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 5:14:13 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
GF>> Is it possible to put dups in the trash folder?
> I think this is a pretty good idea just to make you able to undo.
what is the danger of removing a duplicate of something which you
still have where you started?
--
Dwight A. Cor
Hello Ian,
> Well, here is one screen capture.
There is an extra button on the title bar of your Sorting Office. The
one with a down pointed arrow (triangle) about 1 cm to the left of the
Minimise button. Where does it come from? That's not a standard Windows
button, is it?
--
Best regards,
Mi
Hello Simon,
Saturday, April 22, 2006, 12:04:59 AM, you wrote:
S> Sorry I don't follow?
S> Is this checking applied as the mail arrives in the mail base, or when
S> the Maintenance Centre is run? If my folder has 20,000 messages and
S> merrily deletes 100 of them through the use of subject chec
hi,
Saturday, April 22, 2006, 1:36:49 AM, you wrote:
> Is there a way to 'earmark' duplicates to make the checking easier?
> A colour? A mark or flag? I don't think there is currently but such a feature would be good!
> I can see that by using the "Remove Duplicates" option from right
> cl
Hello Ian!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 5:08 PM, you wrote:
> It turns out that the sorting office dialog needed to be resized. I
> had done nothing to shrink it, but if it gets below a certain size,
> rather than reduce the size of both the conditions and actions (with
> scroll bars as appropriate
Hello Ian!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:56 PM, you wrote:
> I have now worked it out, and it is definitely a bug.
I have been trying to reproduce the bug, and I can't get the dialogue
window small enough to make the bug show up.
The smallest I can downsize it to is about 3 1/2 inches vertical x
hi,
Saturday, April 22, 2006, 12:19:13 AM, you wrote:
> Could you provide some information on this feature; how sure can we
> be/ how can we check that non-duplicates are not being deleted by mistake?
prior to this, any message that lacks Message-Id was simply ignored by the dupekiller (Main
Hello Richard!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:54 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Sorry for complaining without experimenting sufficiently!
> and you're normally so thorough too! ;-)
:rofl2:
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.72.12 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Goncalo,
On 21-04-2006 23:32, you [GF] wrote in
:
9>> Here is a short list of changes: [*] dupe killer: take Subject into
9>> account if message doesn't have a
GF> Is it possible to put dups in the trash folder?
I think this is a pretty good idea just to make you able to undo.
--
Best regar
Hello Richard!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:49 PM, you wrote:
MB>> But I can't seem to find out how to choose an action.
> Right click in the action box of just choose add and that brings up a
> long menu. For instance the first item is "move the message to a folder"
> (well, it is here!) so cli
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:48 PM, you wrote:
> Or, another theory, are you using large fonts?
I'm using large fonts, with no problem.
So maybe it's the "themes" problem that you mentioned which is the
difficulty.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.72.12 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2
Hello Richard!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:45 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Ah, many thanks! That's indeed more convenient.
> Yes, I thought that initially too but, on having a wee play with it, I
> sometimes hit the "add condition" above when I meant to hit the "add"
> button below. Now, if you should h
Hello Ian!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:30 PM, you wrote:
>>> Now both conditions and actions are on the first tab, so you can see
>>> and edit filter actions without switching to the second tab like in
>>> previous versions.
MB>> Ah, many thanks! That's indeed more convenient.
> Something
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 you wrote in
MB> Sorry for complaining without experimenting sufficiently!
and you're normally so thorough too! ;-)
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 you wrote in
MB> But I can't seem to find out how to choose an action.
Right click in the action box of just choose add and that brings up a
long menu. For instance the first item is "move the message to a folder"
(well, it is here!) so click on that and then ano
Hello Ian,
Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:40:03 PM, you wrote:
> Well, here is one screen capture. It shows that there is no way to add
> or see what the filter conditions are, and the second shows the menu
> that comes up when I want to add an action.
Try a different theme. It is possible your theme
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 you wrote in
MB> Ah, many thanks! That's indeed more convenient.
Yes, I thought that initially too but, on having a wee play with it, I
sometimes hit the "add condition" above when I meant to hit the "add"
button below. Now, if you should happen to hit the wrong
Hello Mary!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:35 PM, you wrote:
> But I can't seem to find out how to choose an action.
Found it! I was trying with a filter that for some reason was
faulty--lacked an action. All those with actions are editable.
Sorry for complaining without experimenting sufficientl
e some information on this feature; how sure can we be/
S> how can we check that non-duplicates are not being deleted by mistake?
Well, if you only have 1 message with the subject:
"Re: The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) is now available"
everything works as expected! :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Hello 9Val!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:07 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I've looked, and I can't tell what this re-design entails. Could you
MB>> explain, please?
> Now both conditions and actions are on the first tab, so you can see
> and edit filter actions without switching to the second tab lik
In reply to :
9> Here is a short list of changes:
9> [*] dupe killer: take Subject into account if message doesn't have a
Is it possible to put dups in the trash folder?
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
Every absurdity has a champion to defend it.
___
Hello all,
Friday, April 21, 2006, Ian A. White wrote:
9>> The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) is now available from:
9>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
9>> [*] 'Sorting office' re-design
> What has happened to be able to set a Condition? It is now impossible
> to cr
Hello Ian,
IAW> What has happened to be able to set a Condition? It is now impossible
IAW> to create a new filter or add or edit a condition.
Can't confirm
--
9Val
Cu
Hello Simon,
S> I have noted that when using the 'themes' the button appearance
S> for Actions is different than for Conditions; where they appear the
S> same when using the default theme. See the attached.
There were some internal problems embedding new "stylish" buttons into
conditions frame
Hello 9Val!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 4:07 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I've looked, and I can't tell what this re-design entails. Could you
MB>> explain, please?
> Now both conditions and actions are on the first tab, so you can see
> and edit filter actions without switching to the second tab lik
Hello Mary,
MB> I've looked, and I can't tell what this re-design entails. Could you
MB> explain, please?
Now both conditions and actions are on the first tab, so you can see
and edit filter actions without switching to the second tab like in
previous versions.
--
Hello 9Val!
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 3:33 PM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> [*] 'Sorting office' re-design
I've looked, and I can't tell what this re-design entails. Could you
explain, please?
-
Hello 9Val,
Friday, April 21, 2006, 9:33:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hello All,
> The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) is now available from:
Direct link...
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb37212.rar
Regards,
--
Tony Brookes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tonybro.com
Using The Bat! v3
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[*] dupe killer: take Subject into account if message doesn't have a
MsgID
[*] 'Sorting office' re-design
[-] C
46 matches
Mail list logo
