Hello TBBETA,
Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
whey install well.
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_5-1-0.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_5-1-0.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 3:15:14 PM, you wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
I just ran this msi.
The program installed.
Jerry
--
Ethan J Mings
President, The Desk Consulting Group Inc
Oakville, Ontario Canada. L6L 3B7
Write to me at: qu
Hi Maxim,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:15:14 +0300 UTC (4/18/2012, 2:15 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Maxim Masiutin wrote:
M> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
M> whey install well.
M> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
Ins
Hallo Maxim,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 9:15:14 PM, you wrote:
> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
> whey install well.
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_5-1-0.msi
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_ho
Hello Maxim,
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
Installed fine as 5.1.0.4
Any significant changes from 5.1.0.3?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.0.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Ran
Hello MAU,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 10:57:33 PM, you wrote:
M> Any significant changes from 5.1.0.3?
There were no changes, we were just compiling the MSI.
--
Best regards,
Maximmailto:m...@ritlabs.com
C
Hi Maxim,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 1:15:14 PM, you wrote:
MM> Hello TBBETA,
MM> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
MM> they install well.
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_5-1-0.msi
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/
Hello Maxim,
M>> Any significant changes from 5.1.0.3?
>
> There were no changes, we were just compiling the MSI.
Thanks. It is good that that 4.2.44.2 works with the 5.1 license, this
way I can easily switch between one and the other by running one exe or
the other.
--
Best regards,
Mi
Hallo cees,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:56:15 +0200GMT (18-4-2012, 21:56 , where I
live), you wrote:
C> Installed the Pro and the intpack
Why?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Flamers to the left, flamees to the right, moderator right in between
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 5.1.0.3 (BETA)
Windows 7 6
Hallo Maxim,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:15:14 +0300GMT (18-4-2012, 21:15 , where I
live), you wrote:
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
Hey, my bat is flying again. It stopped doing that when I started
running it on Win 7 last month.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
A mode
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 9:15:14 PM, you wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
No problems here (after uninstalling previous 5.0.36 with Beta .exe's)
with "system" HTML viewer.
--
Best regards,
Uwe
Using The Bat! v5.1.0.4 on Windows 7 6.1
> Hello TBBETA,
> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
> whey install well.
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_5-1-0.msi
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_5-1-0.msi
> http://www.ritlabs.com/downl
Citeren Roelof Otten :
Hallo Roelof,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:56:15 +0200GMT (18-4-2012, 21:56 , where I
live), you wrote:
C> Installed the Pro and the intpack
Why?
??
Why not?
I registered the Pro a long time ago, and this seems to be the latest intpack.
--
kind regards,
Cees Schouten
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 3:15:14 PM, you wrote:
> Hello TBBETA,
> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
> whey install well.
Worked fine for me.
I like the IE renderer, though I use mainly Firefox, then Opera, and,
finally, Chrome.
Hallo cees,
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:18:49 +0200GMT (19-4-2012, 8:18 , where I
live), you wrote:
>> C> Installed the Pro and the intpack
>> Why?
C> I registered the Pro a long time ago, and this seems to be the latest
intpack.
Isn't the intpack included in the pro version?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Dear Stuart,
--->>> Stuart Pye / Thursday Thu 19. Apr 2012, 11:15 AM
The Bat! 5.1 MSI
> I like the IE renderer, though I use mainly Firefox, then Opera,
> and, finally, Chrome.
Just curious what this IE-TB! story is all about
--
best regards | Using Th
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 9:15:14 PM, among other things, you wrote:
MM> Hello TBBETA, Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let
MM> us know if they install well.
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
No problem with ins
Citeren Roelof Otten :
C> I registered the Pro a long time ago, and this seems to be the
latest intpack.
Isn't the intpack included in the pro version?
I have actually no idea. Is it??
--
kind regards,
Cees Schouten
Current beta
>>> C> Installed the Pro and the intpack
>>> Why?
C>> I registered the Pro a long time ago, and this seems to be the latest
intpack.
> Isn't the intpack included in the pro version?
I installed it too. The thought: why would there be a separate MSI for it
if it were included in the others?
So, i
Hello Viktor,
>> Isn't the intpack included in the pro version?
> I installed it too. The thought: why would there be a separate MSI for it
> if it were included in the others?
> So, is it? :)
Yes, it has always been. See my reply to Cs, or this link:
https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/the
Hello Cs,
C>> I registered the Pro a long time ago, and this seems to be the
>> latest intpack.
>
>> Isn't the intpack included in the pro version?
>
> I have actually no idea. Is it??
Yes, it is and has always been. See this link:
https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/diff.php
--
>> I installed it too. The thought: why would there be a separate MSI for it
>> if it were included in the others?
>> So, is it? :)
> Yes, it has always been. See my reply to Cs, or this link:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/diff.php
You are right, thank you for pointing it out.
Now o
Hello Viktor,
> Now only...I i=kind of miss the point in excluding that from the Standard
> version MSI, when it can be downloaded separately. It doesn't prevent Standard
> users from using it, it only gives them a bit more pain by the need to
> download it extra.
> Is there nothing more behi
Hello all,
Wednesday, April 18, 2012, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
> whey install well.
any reason why are included czech SSCE files more than 2 years old? :-(
I do not understand, what is the reason of these MSI files, b
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:15:14 +0300, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
>Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
>whey install well.
Whey installed well but still have the HELP file of version 3 (2005).
Arjan
--
I am here to lose c
Maxim,
FWIW, both this MSI and the previous one triggered a
message box that looked something like this:
+--[ The Bat! Professional v5.1.0 ]+
| |
| The feature you are trying to use is on a |
| network resource
Steven,
Friday, April 20, 2012, 11:12:02 AM, you wrote:
SPV> Maxim,
SPV> FWIW, both this MSI and the previous one triggered a
SPV> message box that looked something like this:
I forgot to mention that pressing the CANCEL button
allowed the install to continue and complete without
further inci
On Friday, April 20, 2012, 10:12:02 AM, Steven P Vallière wrote:
> FWIW, both this MSI and the previous one triggered a
> message box that looked something like this:
> +--[ The Bat! Professional v5.1.0 ]+
> | |
> | The fe
Dwight,
Friday, April 20, 2012, 2:05:49 PM, you wrote:
DC> I fired up my XP machine and ran the MSI, and got this same result. I
DC> have seen it on that box with TB! msi's for a long time. I always
DC> assumed it was because of something I had done some time, and gave it
DC> no mind. Jus
29 matches
Mail list logo
