Hello Tony,
Monday, August 18, 2003, 7:30:25 AM, you wrote:
TB> Hello Sean,
TB> A reminder of what Sean Rima (TCOB1) typed on:
TB> 18 August 2003 at 11:34:57 GMT +0100
SRT>> I guess that is a work around for now.
TB> My Trash won't empty when I shut down but "Right Click > Empty Folder"
Hello Sean,
A reminder of what Sean Rima (TCOB1) typed on:
18 August 2003 at 11:34:57 GMT +0100
SRT> I guess that is a work around for now.
My Trash won't empty when I shut down but "Right Click > Empty Folder"
works fine.
--
Best regards,Tony.
__
Hello.
DH> Hello Paul!
DH> On Sunday, August 17, 2003 at 2:37:37 PM you wrote:
>> very cryptic, but not very informative.
DH> Hopefully for the last time: I don't know more than you. I just try to
DH> help.
i am not confident in correct translation into English, but this sort:
to tell lies -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Steve,
Monday, August 18, 2003, 12:19:51 AM, you wrote:
SMK> Sean, Sunday, August 17, 2003, 1:59:16 PM, you wrote:==
>> I have used Beta 2 but won't use it as I cannot delete mails etc, as per
>> other messages. Whatever happens, w
Hello Tony Boom,
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:16:42 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, August 17, 2003, 8:16:42 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tony Boom wrote:
> Hello Martin,
> A reminder of what Martin Schoch typed on:
> 17 August 2003 at 15:04:17 GMT +0200
MS>> And what is this go
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:27:26 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, August 17, 2003, 4:27:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Dierk Haasis wrote:
> Hello Martin!
> On Sunday, August 17, 2003 at 11:21:06 AM you wrote:
>> [...] I can't understand the
>> policy to change
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch typed on:
17 August 2003 at 12:41:03 GMT +0200
MS> And it seems that your copy of 2.0Beta2 is registered... So my
MS> question: How did you got it?
He's using Beta 1 but with a changed version number. He told you he
hacked it...
I've not
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, 8:41 AM, you wrote:
DRS>> Not being one to enjoy stepping through unregistered and "This version
DRS>> will expire in xxx couple of days." I have gone back to 1.63b9 as the
DRS>> only new version of The_Bat! that I can run legally is v2b1 which had
DRS>> some rather s
Hi Dierk
On Sunday, August 17, 2003 2:17:24 PM you wrote:
>> Ha ha - can't you tell me the truth
> As written in another message: I can't as I don't know it.
You don't know why your 2.0beta2 is running in a registered mode? No,
please!
>> Yes of course - you can always find things which are
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, 8:25 AM, you wrote:
>>> And it seems that your copy of 2.0Beta2 is registered
DH>> Perhaps I hacked it?
sarcasm only gets people pissed off.
>>> But a beta tester with a new key? So RITLabs split testers now in two
>>> classes?
DH>> Perhaps there are other consi
Sunday, August 17, 2003
8:11:27 AM (GMT -05:00)
RE: "Unregistration"
Greetings Martin,
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, 6:41:03 AM, you wrote:
MS> But a beta tester with a new key? So RITLabs split testers now in two
MS> classes?
Having beta tested every available version of The_
Hello Martin!
On Sunday, August 17, 2003 at 1:37:06 PM you wrote:
> Ha ha - can't you tell me the truth
As written in another message: I can't as I don't know it.
> For example?
I don't know (but see my other message).
> Yes of course - you can always find things which are worse. But is
> sho
Hi Dierk
On Sunday, August 17, 2003 1:12:33 PM you wrote:
>> And it seems that your copy of 2.0Beta2 is registered
> Perhaps I hacked it?
Ha ha - can't you tell me the truth or are such secrets now a part of the
new policy?
>> But a beta tester with a new key? So RITLabs split testers now in
13 matches
Mail list logo
