Hi Charlene,
on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 15:22 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
>
>
> Hi Roland Burger,
>
>
> Thursday, December 15, 2005
>
> you let us know -at least in parts- :
>
>
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoti
Hello Charlene!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 5:33 AM, you wrote:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
> Hope this issue and all those concerning headers will be fixed ASAP.
Stefan reports on that page that this issue is fixed in v. 3.63.13.
>> This may be related to the missing temp
Hi Mary,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Thanks for putting that information on BT at
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
Hope this issue and all those concerning headers will be fixed ASAP.
> This may be related to the missing template macros as no
Hello Charlene,
Thursday, December 15, 2005, 9:07:18 PM, you wrote:
CF> It was spoken
CF> that the ID was cloaked by default because TB at a certain moment was
CF> under suspicion to be a mass mailer tool (don't remember the correct
CF> expression) and therefor was blocked by some ISPs.
Mine is
Hello Charlene,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in
>> Well, I've just had a look at my headers and the X-Mailer is disabled
>> here.
CF> Funny though that from your mail's header I can see which version
CF> you are using currently -see attached png.
Yes, I noticed that too and it's why I mentione
Hi Richard Wakeford,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
CF>> Your header is as courteous as you have always been ;)
> Just as well I don't wear a hat, I'd be buying the next size up!
If you ever feel in the right mood to change that habitude, please
update your ro
Hello Charlene,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in
CF> Your header is as courteous as you have always been ;)
Just as well I don't wear a hat, I'd be buying the next size up!
CF> You are using
CF> "The Bat! (v3.63.12 (Beta)) Professional" it says. The header entry
CF> about the enabling or disab
Hi Zygmunt Wereszczynski,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Probably you can see yourself from Address
> Book, because your message does not contain X-Rogue field in the header.
Yes, I saw it. That was subject of my test. I wonde
Hi Richard Wakeford,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> Not being to well up on all these headers (I only use the ones people
> tell me about) could you elucidate further and then I might stop being
> one of those who doesn't have the X-mailer ID disabled as it i
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 1:14:47 PM, Charlene Ferrara wrote:
> It would be helpful for others and would show some kind of courtesy
> to fellow users.
It used to be automatic. There was some problem with blacklists of TB!
which led to making it an option. My information is more available
th
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, at 15:22:25 [UTC+0100] (Thursday, December
15, 2005 15:22 my local time) Charlene Ferrara wrote:
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB be seen by the recipient.
> Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right
Hello Charlene,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in
CF> I often wonder why some list members constantly refrain from enabling
CF> the X-mailer ID in Options | Preferences | "Use X-mailer header..."
CF> It would be helpful for others and would show some kind of courtesy to
CF> fellow users.
Not bei
Hi Mary Bull,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> Not seeing either the X-Rogue handle or the Roguemoticon here.
Strange that this doesn't affect all TBBETA-list members. Some rogues I
can see and some not.
>> Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do this for te
Hallo Roland,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:12:01 +0100GMT (15-12-2005, 15:12 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
RB> Hi Peter,
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel si
Hello Roland!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:58 AM, you wrote:
>>> An I cannot use my QTs with version 3.63.12! May be it is due to
>>> that there is nothing working if you click on "To" in new mails!
>> You mean in the headers?
> Normally there has to be opened the addressbook to insert the
Hi Mary,
on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 15:41 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
> Hello Roland!
>> An I cannot use my QTs with version 3.63.12! May be it is due to
>> that there is nothing working if you click on "To" in new mails!
> You mean in the headers?
Norm
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:50:58 AM, Mary Bull wrote:
>> Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do this for testing purpose
>> only. I manually put in my rogue handle and want to know if it
>> really works for HTML.
> Doesn't work for this recipient. (:
> Anywqay, HTML editor would be no ac
Hello Dwight!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:42 AM, you wrote:
>> Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you
>> would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
>> All support will be greatly appreciated!
> Done. ...
Thanks a mil to you, Dwight, and to all others who h
Hello Charlene!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:22 AM, you wrote:
MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon
MB cannot be seen by the recipient.
> Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now!
Not seeing either the X-Rogue handle or the Roguemotic
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:30:47 AM, Mary Bull wrote:
> Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you
> would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
> All support will be greatly appreciated!
Done. Hope someone at RITlabs will find the time to read them.
--
Dwight
Hello Roland!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:12 AM, you wrote:
MB>>> For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon
MB>>> cannot be seen by the recipient.
>> This is also true for my template macros
>> %SetHeader("X-No-Archive","yes")%-
>> %SetHeader("X-Archive","expiry=0")%
Hi Roland Burger,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
MB>>> For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB>>> be seen by the recipient.
Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now!
Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I
Hi Peter,
on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 14:38 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
> Answering a current message (Thursday, December 15, 2005, 14:30)
> Hello Mary,
MB>> For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB>> be seen by the recipient
Hello Charlene!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:49 AM, you wrote:
>> if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
>> All support will be greatly appreciated!
> Added a note, since it is not working here either. Only pictures
> from address book are shown, however.
Thanks for puttin
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:38 AM, you wrote:
MB>> For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB>> be seen by the recipient.
> This is also true for my template macros
> %SetHeader("X-No-Archive","yes")%-
> %SetHeader("X-Archive","expiry=0")%-
> B
Hi Mary Bull,
Thursday, December 15, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
> if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
> All support will be greatly appreciated!
Added a note, since it is not working here either. Only pictures from
address book are shown, however.
--
kind re
Answering a current message (Thursday, December 15, 2005, 14:30)
Hello Mary,
MB> For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
MB> be seen by the recipient.
This is also true for my template macros
%SetHeader("X-No-Archive","yes")%-
%SetHeader("X-Archive","expiry=0")%-
Hello all,
Thursday, December 15, 2005, Mary Bull wrote:
> Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462
> if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed.
> All support will be greatly appreciated!
confirm and supported in BT.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
Hello Everyone!
For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot
be seen by the recipient. Even if you type the handle in manually in
the MicroEd "Edit Mail Message" window, after the message is sent,
there is no X-Rogue field to be seen when it is opened in the
recipient's vie
29 matches
Mail list logo
