AOL and The Bat

Hello TBTech, Anybody works with AOL servers with The Bat? And are there some additional problems (download mail from AOL account)? 2Marck - sorry, if it's offtopic -- Best regards, Alexander Leschinsky -- __ Archives :

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hi Alexander, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 02:54:24 +0600 you wrote: > Anybody works with AOL servers with The Bat? And are there some > additional problems (download mail from AOL account)? AFAIK, it's not possible, but that's not TB!'s fault. IIRC AOL doesn't publish the addresses of their pop and

Re: AOL and The Bat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexander, On 26 March 2001 at 02:54:24 +0600 (which was 21:54 where I live) Alexander Leschinsky wrote to TBTech and made these points: AL> Anybody works with AOL servers with The Bat? And are there some AL> additional problems (download mai

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hi Alexander, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 03:47:16 +0600 you wrote: > Well, AOL client _know_ these settings and _can_ download mail > using Netscape Yes, and I think that both, AOL's own client and Netscape 6, have built-in settings for AOL email accounts. Don't forget that AOL is the owner of Nets

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hello Alexander, On Monday, March 26, 2001 at 02:54:24 +0600 GMT (3:54 PM my local time) you wrote: AL> Hello TBTech, AL> Anybody works with AOL servers with The Bat? And are there some AL> additional problems (download mail from AOL account)? AL> 2Marck - sorry, if it's offtopic As far as

Re: AOL and The Bat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lars, Monday, March 26, 2001, 10:37:54 PM, you wrote: >> Anybody works with AOL servers with The Bat? And are there some >> additional problems (download mail from AOL account)? LG> AFAIK, it's not possible, but that's not TB!'s fault. IIRC AO

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hi Alexander, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 08:28:40 +0600 you wrote: > This AOL user want read get and read mail in The Bat. He know > accounts settings and, entered in Messenges, they works and > Netscape download mail OK, if it works in Netscape, I guess that AOL is using some proprietary protocol,

Re: AOL and The Bat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lars! On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 10:57:49 AM you wrote: > Back in the days when I was an AOL customer (over 2 > years ago) the problem was you didn't have the server data to set > up another MUA. AFAIR it was not just that, they use propri

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hi Dierk, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 11:09:55 +0200 you wrote: > AFAIR it was not just that, they use proprietary ports and > protocols. they are actually proud that nothing but their own > software can access their e-mail accounts. Well, I'm no AOL employee, so I don't know the exact reason. I can

Re: AOL and The Bat

On Monday, March 26, 2001 at 02:54:24 +0600 Alexander Leschinsky wrote: > Anybody works with AOL servers with The Bat? And are there some > additional problems (download mail from AOL account)? As others have speculated, AOL doesn't use standard protocols (SMTP, POP3, etc.) for email, so there

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hallo Lars, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:57:49 +0200 GMT (27/03/2001, 16:57 +0800 GMT), Lars Geiger wrote with The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/1) Personal: LG> Have you tried using telnet to connect to AOL's pop3 server? This no work. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Lost

Re: AOL and The Bat

Hi Thomas, On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, at 01:57:36 +0800 you wrote: > This no work. To be honest, I didn't expect it to work, but it could give some hints what problem Alexander is facing. I expected some protocol trouble and this was the easiest way to check it. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.52 Beta/

Re[2]: AOL and The Bat

Hello Lars, On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:37:54 +0200 (27.03.2001 03:37 my local time) you wrote about "AOL and The Bat" at least in part: LG> AFAIK, it's not possible, but that's not TB!'s fault. IIRC AOL LG> doesn't publish the addresses of their po

Re[3]: AOL and The Bat

hi Monday, March 26, 2001, 11:47:16 PM: LG>> AFAIK, it's not possible, but that's not TB!'s fault. IIRC AOL LG>> doesn't publish the addresses of their pop and smtp servers. AL> Well, AOL client _know_ these settings and _can_ download mail using AL> Netscape, but he want The Bat :-) and "could

Re[2]: AOL and The Bat

Hello Lars, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:35:24 +0200 (27.03.2001 04:35 my local time) you wrote about "AOL and The Bat" at least in part: LG> Hi Alexander, LG> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 03:47:16 +0600 you wrote: >> Well, AOL client _know_ these settings and _can_

Re[2]: AOL and The Bat

Hi, >> but he want The Bat :-) and "could not connect to server". > I don't quite understand you here. Who wants The Bat? Does > Netscape run The Bat? Yes, but Navigator only, not Communicator. -- Bye, Marek Mikus \---/ |Marek Mikus| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | >

Re[3]: AOL and The Bat

hi Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 4:28:40 AM: LG>> IMHO the reason is that you don't have AOL's server data to LG>> create an account in The Bat. And how should The Bat know where LG>> to get the messages from? > Well, well, I thought, what it's rather clearly. Account data, which > _works_ in Messeng

Re[4]: AOL and The Bat

Hello Michal, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:01:08 +0200 (27.03.2001 14:01 my local time) you wrote about "AOL and The Bat" at least in part: mt> osted-by: Duta Integrasi Pratama - Indonesia SOT - anybody else got this mail damaged? mt> But if they put these settings anyw

Re[5]: AOL and The Bat

hi Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 11:07:36 AM: mt>> But if they put these settings anywhere (as they do -- in Netscape), mt>> then it's fairly easy to find them. > Well, it is _not_ needed find settings, they alredy was copied to The > Bat (server-name, protocol, port) :-0 Post the session transcript

Re[4]: AOL and The Bat

Hello Michal, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:48:48 +0200 (27.03.2001 14:48 my local time) you wrote about "AOL and The Bat" at least in part: mt> Could you post it here (the data)? No problem: Server Type: IMAP Server Name: imap.mail.aol.com Port : 143 Outgoing Server: smtp.aol.

Re[2]: AOL and The Bat

Hello Dierk, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:09:55 +0200 (27.03.2001 15:09 my local time) you wrote about "AOL and The Bat" at least in part: DH> AFAIR it was not just that, they use proprietary ports and protocols. DH> they are actually proud that nothing but their own softwa

List header was(Re: AOL and The Bat)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexander On 27 March 2001 at 15:07:36 +0600 (which was 10:07 where I live) Alexander Leschinsky might have writtern mt>> osted-by: Duta Integrasi Pratama - Indonesia > SOT - anybody else got this mail damaged? Not here. Is it a corrupted list

Re: List header was(Re: AOL and The Bat)

Hello David, On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:38:33 +0100 (27.03.2001 15:38 my local time) you wrote about "List header was(Re: AOL and The Bat)" at least in part: DE> Not here. Is it a corrupted list header? Yes. It's last headers n _my_ case >List-Administrator: <

Re: List header was(Re: AOL and The Bat)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Alexander, Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 8:09:00 PM, you wrote: DE>> Not here. Is it a corrupted list header? AL> Yes. It's last headers n _my_ case >>List-Administrator: >> List-Archive:

Re[2]: List header was(Re: AOL and The Bat)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > That's not a corrupted header. It's a new way of transmitting regular > expressions. LOL -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt (Build 04/01) Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered. iQA/AwUBOsNN1PmK8eZlD0U0EQIu9QCgoZ15bbvrXMG7mVVLUn0