Hello Carsten,
> The References: header is the only header that counts for this
> regular expression.
>
> ((?:\nReferences:[^\n]*?)(?:\n\s[^\n]*?)*(@ermspain.com>))
>
> It looks for the string References: only at the beginning of
> lines. If the domain part of the message id isn't in this first
* "Miguel A. Urech" writes:
> I need/want to set up a manual filter to flag messages that include a
> MID from me (my domain) in the References header line.
((?:\nReferences:[^\n]*?)(?:\n\s[^\n]*?)*(@ermspain.com>))
This one finds your FQDM (here @ermspain.com>) in the
References: header lines o
Hello Jonathan,
> I'm not sure what the "" option means under the
> filters, and cannot find anything in the help.
It is the default group, None. Just try it, edit colour groups and
assign a background or font colour to it and see what happens.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Miguel A. Urech wrote...
>> So are all messages that come in assigned a colour group? If they
>> don't match a certain other criteria, they are assigned to the
>> "Generic Group" colour?
> I don't know when are the incom
Hello Jonathan,
> So are all messages that come in assigned a colour group? If they
> don't match a certain other criteria, they are assigned to the
> "Generic Group" colour? Or are the ones that have been processed been
> assigned that colour group? If the former, then yes, I'd probably
> conside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Miguel A. Urech wrote...
> Anyway, when I have some time I will re-test to see if I can
> understand why it fails when selecting "Message is associated with a
> Colour Group" - "Generic Group". A bug perhaps?
So are all
Hello Jonathan,
> Then replace Sender with Kludges again, and in the strings part, make
> a regex that matches the other fields, such as:
>
> X-Envelope-From|From|: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, if I include X-Envelope-To then I would match any message at all
because *all* message include X-Envelope-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Miguel A. Urech wrote...
>> Strings: <.*?@ermspain.com>
>> Location: Kludges
>> Presence: Yes
>>
>> AND
>>
>> Strings: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Location: Sender
>> Presence: No
> Not exactly. Maybe I should have given mor
Hello,
>> Anyway, why don't you look for "Message-ID:\s*<.*?@ermspain.com>"
>> so you don't need to look for your email-address.
>
> Because I'm looking in messages not from me in the References: header
> line(s).
Although I should have added that I don't mind matching my own
messages.
--
Best
Hello Jonathan,
> This would mean that your filter would only match if he was
> searching for messages he had sent, but from the description he's
> looking to flag messages he has replies to. But also from
> his description, he's looking to *not* flag his own emails (am I
> right?). Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Gerd Ewald wrote...
>> I thought Miguel's requirements were the other way around. I'm sure
> [...]
>> This would mean that your filter would only match if he was
>> searching for messages he had sent, but from the
Hello Jonathan Angliss !
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:39:35 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was 21.01.2003, 22:39 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jonathan Angliss)
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I thought Miguel's requirements were the other way around. I'm sure
[...]
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Gerd Ewald wrote...
>>> Anyway, why don't you look for "Message-ID:\s*<.*?@ermspain.com>"
>>> so you don't need to look for your email-address.
>> Not all hosts add that kind of message-id... Some add:
>> randomidhere
Hello Gerd,
> To have a positive match "\[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" should already work
I'll try this one also, thanks.
> Anyway, why don't you look for "Message-ID:\s*<.*?@ermspain.com>"
> so you don't need to look for your email-address.
Because I'm looking in messages not from me in the References:
Hello Jonathan Angliss !
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:59:11 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was 21.01.2003, 21:59 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Jonathan Angliss)
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Anyway, why don't you look for "Message-ID:\s*<.*?@ermspain.com>" so
>> you don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Gerd Ewald wrote...
> Anyway, why don't you look for "Message-ID:\s*<.*?@ermspain.com>" so
> you don't need to look for your email-address.
Not all hosts add that kind of message-id... Some add:
randomidhere@computern
Hello Miguel A. Urech !
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:18:39 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was 20.01.2003, 17:18 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Miguel Urech)
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Strings: <.*\[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Location: Kludges
> Presence: Yes
> And I have selec
Hello Brano,
> try [0-9]@ermspain.com
Ahhh! That's a good one, thanks. I'll certainly try.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBTECH" information:
http://www.si
Hello Manuel,
> No, makes * ungreedy in this case 8-)
Glups! You are right. I said I'm not a Regex expert :-(
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBTECH" informa
Miguel A. Urech [MAU], on Monday, January 20, 2003 at 17:18 (+0100)
thinks about in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MAU> Strings: <.*\[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MAU> Location: Kludges
MAU> Presence: Yes
try [0-9]@ermspain.com
--
...m8s, cu l8r, Brano.
["Voulez-vous ce couchez avec moi ce
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On 2003-01-20, at 20:06 CET, you wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, it doesn't work. In Regex, ? = Zero or one instances of the atom.
No, makes * ungreedy in this case 8-)
> Thanks anyway, and see my reply to Daniel.
Already read. Intriguing.
--
Hola Manuel,
> What about <.*?\[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
No, it doesn't work. In Regex, ? = Zero or one instances of the atom.
Thanks anyway, and see my reply to Daniel.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
___
Hi Daniel,
> In the slot for the string, type in the logically ORed expression:
Thank for the suggestion. I tried it and it didn't work either. I
could not believe it didn't work neither my way, not Tim's not yours.
So, I though there must be something else, and there was but I don't
understand w
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On 2003-01-20, at 17:18 CET, you wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Strings: <.*\[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Location: Kludges
> Presence: Yes
> And I have selected Regular Expression on the Options tab.
> Note: I use the \d so it will look for a digit before
Hi Miguel,
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:18:39 [GMT +0100] (11:18 AM EST here) you wrote:
> Hello all,
> I need/want to set up a manual filter to flag messages that include a
> MID from me (my domain) in the References header line. I'm certainly
> no expert with Regexp and, aside of that, I didn't have a
Hey Miguel,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.61) Business
to write the following on Monday, January 20, 2003 at 11:18:39 AM.
MAU> Strings: <.*\[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MAU> But this is not working, not finding any. Any idea why?
I am certinly not a RegEx expert, but will hazard a suggestion.
Tr
Hello all,
I need/want to set up a manual filter to flag messages that include a
MID from me (my domain) in the References header line. I'm certainly
no expert with Regexp and, aside of that, I didn't have a good night
sleep last night.
I have set up the following:
Strings: <.*\[EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo