Re: The Bat!

Hello Nick, NA> I have tried to install The Bat! several times and it still will not NA> show up in the "add/remove" programs listing. This is a know issue. There was a bug in the installation file assembly batch. Fixed in oncoming 1.45 release... -- Cheers, Stefan ...Syste

Re[2]: "Corrupt" TBI file -- should I use a backup?

Hello Marck, MDP> Stefan - memos and TBIs? What's the story? Well, nothing is ideal. :-) Generally, TBB keeps message bodies, TBI keeps everything shown in the message list pane including memos... Now you made me thinking about how it is possible to implement storing Memos in TBB. :-) -- Rea

Re: The Bat!

This message: 22/07/2000 09:19 GMT. Hello Nick, On 22 July 2000 at 18:09:02 GMT -0700 (which was 02:09 where I live) Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: NA> I have tried to install The Bat! several times and it still will not NA> show up in the "add/remove" programs listing This has only just app

Re: Plain Text Vs Html

This message: 22/07/2000 09:28 GMT. Hello Januk, On 22 July 2000 at 18:28:47 GMT -0700 (which was 02:28 where I live) Januk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: JA> Nope... there is a difference. JA> You can try this simple test at home. But your still sending attachments. Regardless of how the message i

Re: Plain Text Vs Html

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:11:43 +0100, Tony Boom wrote: TB> What fascinates me is the amount of OE users that don't realize OE TB> sends html by default. It sends HTML as well as a plain text version by default. -- -=A.C. Martin=- [ TB! v1.45 Beta/12 | Win2k Pro ] PGP Key: mailto:[E

Re: PGP

Hi Nick On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, 23:04:30 your time (GMT -0700), you wrote to the list: NA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- NA> Hash: SHA1 NA> On Wednesday, July 19, 2000, 10:31:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nnn>> I need to learn to use PGP with email. Does anyone know a mailing list nnn>> o

Re[2]: Plain Text Vs Html

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Curtis! Saturday, July 22, 2000, 1:04:07 PM, you wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:11:43 +0100, Tony Boom wrote: TB>> What fascinates me is the amount of OE users that don't realize OE TB>> sends html by default. > It sends HTML as wel

Re: PGP

Jack LaRosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JL> Can you explain exactly where PGP comes into play regarding these JL> (list) messages? I'd like to know that answer to that question, too. If the identity of a key pair is the list address, say <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, then everybody on that list would hav

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Jack, On Saturday, July 22, 2000 at 05:35:08 -0500 GMT (6:35 AM my local time) you wrote: JL> I was going to ask this off-list when I realized there may be others JL> out there who are as ignorant as I; so here goes: JL> Can you explain exactly where PG

Re: Plain Text Vs Html

Hi Tom On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:44:38 -0700GMT (which was 21/07/2000, 18:44 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: TP> I was asking what the difference *at the message level*, not *at TP> the TB! level* between the above, as Tony asserted that there was TP> some difference between "an HTML message" and

Re[2]: The Bat!

Hello Tony, Saturday, July 22, 2000, 9:24:13 AM, you wrote: TB> This message: 22/07/2000 09:19 GMT. TB> Hello Nick, TB> On 22 July 2000 at 18:09:02 GMT -0700 (which was 02:09 where I live) TB> Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: NA>> I have tried to install The Bat! several times and it still will

Re[3]: Plain Text Vs Html

Hello Dierk, Saturday, July 22, 2000, 1:29:46 PM, you wrote: DH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- DH> Hash: SHA1 DH> Hello Curtis! DH> Saturday, July 22, 2000, 1:04:07 PM, you wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:11:43 +0100, Tony Boom wrote: TB>>> What fascinates me is the amount of OE users

Re: Plain Text Vs Html

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:26:48 +0200, Roel wrote: R> A html-formatted message (without attachments!) will always have one R> of these in the headers: R> "Content-Type: multipart/alternative;" This is the usually what I receive and this is what Oe sends when HTML is enabled, ie, a plain tex

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages

BP>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs? MDP> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities, MDP> then yes. Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product but as a software engineer I use it every day. -- >From

Re[3]: Archiving old mail messages

On Saturday, July 22, 2000, 11:46:23 AM, Jamie Dainton wrote: BP>>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs? MDP>> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities, MDP>> then yes. > Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, July 22, 2000, 6:50:54 AM, Kevin Coates wrote: JL> I was going to ask this off-list when I realized there may be others JL> out there who are as ignorant as I; so here goes: Jack, I would like to personally extend an invitation to both

Re: The Bat!

This message: 22/07/2000 19:14 GMT. Hello Jamie, On 22 July 2000 at 16:35:54 GMT +0100 (which was 16:35 where I live) Jamie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: JD> Lets be honest here. To uninstall TB! all you have to do is delete the JD> program files and delete the registry key

Re: Filtering trash

On Friday, July 21, 2000, 12:57:34 PM, Clif Oliver wrote: TF>> Not really. You can use a "read" filter. This filter will kick in when TF>> you close the message after reading it, and will move it to the TF>> correct folder. Unless you hit delete, of course. Do you have to actually "open" the me

Re: Archiving old mail messages

Saturday, July 22, 2000, 8:46:23 AM, Jamie wrote: BP>>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs? MDP>> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities, MDP>> then yes. > Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product > b

Re: Using TB on 2 systems: database? INI-File??

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 21:49:18 +0200, Johannes M. Posel wrote: >> What you want to do is probably even easier. I'd copy your TB >> installation onto the laptop and just run TB. If setting up your >> accounts is a pain, well, the registry keys to back up I'd figure are >> all the "The Bat!" ones,

Re: PGP

Hello Nick, On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 at 12:43:52 [GMT -0700], you wrote: NA> "so please don't ever think you have to take anything off-List as NA> a Member of PGP-Basics. Owww, was that a jab! Leif Gregory -- TBUDL/TBBETA List Moderator ICQ 216395 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web Site

Re: PGP

On Saturday, July 22, 2000, 4:09:13 PM, Leif Gregory wrote: LG> Owww, was that a jab! You know Leif, after I sent the message, I was wondering if some might misinterpret what I had written. Hindsight is always 20/20! I apologize if I made it sound as if TBUDL/TBBETA was any different than PGP-B

Filtering HASH and VERSION in PGP-Signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello ! I have seen some PGP signed mails in which the lines "HASH:" and "Version:" were missing. They were send using TB. I was searching for an option which automatically deletes the "Version" line, but I can't find anything. (The sender of the mai

original message’s text in the initial text of a reply

How do you get the original message text in the reply? I read the Help file, but I didn't understand it. I just installed TB! so I'm on the bottom end of the learning curve. Thanks, Kent -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.t

Re: original message’s text in the initial text of a reply

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 20:31:07 -0500, Kent R. Frazier wrote: KRF> How do you get the original message text in the reply? I read the Help KRF> file, but I didn't understand it. I just installed TB! so I'm on the KRF> bottom end of the learning curve. TB! uses message templates. These templ

Re: original message’s text in the initial text of a reply

On Saturday, July 22, 2000, 6:31:07 PM, Kent R. Frazier wrote: KRF> How do you get the original message text in the reply? I read the Help KRF> file, but I didn't understand it. I just installed TB! so I'm on the KRF> bottom end of the learning curve. F4 Reply using quoted text Shift + F4 Rep

Re: Using TB on 2 systems: database? INI-File??

Servus Tom, Am 21.07.2000 so gegen 01:08 meintest Du: > I use it on two computers as well, with the mail database stored on my > laptop. Either at work or at home, I connect via hidden share (major > PITA in TB, but what can you do?). Sure, but the problem is there I'll be in a LAN that doesnt

Re: FreeStuff

Greetings Mark! On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 12:44:01 GMT +0100 (which was 4:44 AM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: MRH> Hi Mark, MRH> http://www.bahlsen.co.uk/try.htm MRH> Bahlsen MRH> http://www.myfreeld.com/download.html MRH> Free Telecom offers... MRH> Cheers, MR

Re: Filtering trash

Hallo Nick, On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:47:28 -0700 GMT (23/07/00, 03:47 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: TF>>> Not really. You can use a "read" filter. This filter will kick in when TF>>> you close the message after reading it, and will move it to the TF>>> correct folder. Unless you hit delete, of