Re: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread Manfred Ell
On 12-11-2000 at 06:32:14GMT +0100 (which was 5:32 where I live) Vincent - D. Ertner wrote regarding the subject of " envelope-to header " > who creates an envelope-to header? I try to configure a program, > which needs this header - but obviously doesn't get one, if I'm > sending mail in ... any

Re: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, On 12 November 2000 at 06:32:14 GMT +0100 (which was 05:32 where I live) Vincent - D. Ertner wrote and made these points: VDE> who creates an envelope-to header? I try to configure a program, VDE> which needs this header - but obviously

Re[2]: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread Mike Zanker
At 10:36 12/11/2000, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > Not sure what you mean by this. The SMTP RCPT TO is taken from the > "To:" address line. The SMTP FROM envelope is taken from the "From:" > address. What is an "envelope-to" header? Is it a special x-header? > can you use X-Ray to ad

Re: Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:08:19 -0800, Ming-Li thoughtfully wrote the following: ML> If TB provides a "bozo bin" as Gravity or XNews do, or at allow AB ML> entries or filter items to expire after certain days as Agent does, ML> filtering spammers direct

Re: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 10:36:51 +, Marck D. Pearlstone graced us with these comments: [..] MDP> Not sure what you mean by this. The SMTP RCPT TO is taken from the MDP> "To:" address line. The SMTP FROM envelope is taken from the MDP> "From:" address

Re[2]: Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi A. Curtis, On Sunday, November 12, 2000 @ 07:10:10 -0500 you wrote the following in regards to Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!: A. Curtis> I use Neotrace and TB!'s templates. I created a A. Curtis>

Re[2]: Choose template on the basis of language

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On Saturday, November 11, 2000 @ 19:43:25 -0800, you wrote the following about "Choose template on the basis of language" Ming-Li> other useful keyboard shortcuts, and you can find Ming-Li> them at: Ming-Li>

Re: Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Ming-Li
On Sunday, November 12, 2000, 4:10:10 AM, A. wrote: ML>> If TB provides a "bozo bin" as Gravity or XNews do, or at allow ML>> AB entries or filter items to expire after certain days as ML>> Agent does, filtering spammers directly would be much easier ML>> and more practical. > The bozo bin princ

Re: Choose template on the basis of language

2000-11-12 Thread Ming-Li
On Sunday, November 12, 2000, 6:05:35 AM, Jan wrote: Ming-Li>> other useful keyboard shortcuts, and you can find them Ming-Li>> at: > This link is not working for me, Ming-Li. Really? Just tried, and it works. Or try this:

Re: Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12 November, 2000, 10:24 AM, I saw Ming-Li's comments made on Sun, 12 Nov 2000 06:57:33 -0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth: ML> I want a bozo bin exactly because spammers (email or newsgrouop ones ML> alike) change their addresses

Re[2]: Choose template on the basis of language

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On Sunday, November 12, 2000 @ 06:45:36 -0800, you wrote the following about "Choose template on the basis of language" Ming-Li>>> >> This link

Re[2]: macro dumping *just* eGroups ads

2000-11-12 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, On Friday, November 10, 2000 @ 14:15:01 + you wrote the following in regards to macro dumping *just* eGroups ads: Marck> [...] This is the wrong macro. [...] Your situation Marck> is the opposite -

Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Alexander Turcic
Hi, I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the mailbox files. The password feature to secure access to a mailbox is well meant, but it is more or less useless if anyone with access to the .tbb files can read those using any ASCII editor. -- Best regards, Alexander

Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Alexander Levenetz
Hi, > I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the > mailbox files. Good question, I would be interested in that myself. And my additional question is if there is/will be a way to encrypt (only) folders in an account (instead or even in addition of the account)? Thank

Re: Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Dean
Hello Ming-Li, Saturday, November 11, 2000, 9:56:02 PM, you wrote: : M> On Saturday, November 11, 2000, 12:30:45 PM, Dean wrote: M>>> Personally, I don't use any spam filter, for I've got very few M>>> so far. :) >> I believe you'll find there's a reason behind that, the $ fine for >> spam

Re:Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!

2000-11-12 Thread Assad Toorab
Hello Curtis, On 12 November 2000, A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of "Trying to make a "anti-spam filter" in The Bat!": ACM> Yeah. I wish I had such a team to forward my tons of spam to. It ACM> would appear that my ISP doesn't implement any antispam measures. ACM

Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Alexander, On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 at 17:24:59 GMT +0100 (which was 8:24 AM where I live) witnesses say Alexander Turcic typed: > I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the > mailbox files. No. TB used to use some encryption, but that was very weak, so they remo

Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Karin Spaink
On 12-11-2000 at 22:59, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote: > Alexander Turcic typed: >> I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the >> mailbox files. > No. TB used to use some encryption, but that was very weak, so they > removed all encryption. It is now up to the user to

Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Manfred Ell
On 12-11-2000 at 23:24:22GMT +0100 (which was 22:24 where I live) Karin Spaink wrote regarding the subject of " Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes? " > On 12-11-2000 at 22:59, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote: >> Alexander Turcic typed: >>> I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts

Re: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Alexander, Sunday, November 12, 2000, 4:24:59 PM, you wrote: AT> I am curious if there is an option (planned?) in TB that encrypts the AT> mailbox files. AT> The password feature to secure access to a mailbox is well meant, but AT> it is more or less useless if anyone with access to the .tbb

Sorting by Subject AND Date

2000-11-12 Thread Lynn Kucera
Hello TBUDL, I've only been using The Bat! for about 3 weeks now and I've been looking in the Help file and I have looking under Dates and Sorting in the FAQ but I can't seem to find any reference if you can sort the messages in your individual mail folders by first the Subject and second by Date

Re: Sorting by Subject AND Date

2000-11-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Lynn, On Sun, 12 Nov 2000 23:24:15 -0600GMT (13/11/2000, 13:24 +0800GMT), Lynn Kucera wrote: LK> I've only been using The Bat! for about 3 weeks now and I've been LK> looking in the Help file and I have looking under Dates and Sorting in LK> the FAQ but I can't seem to find any reference if y

Re: envelope-to header

2000-11-12 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Mike Zanker, Responding to your article on Sun, 12 Nov 2000 at 11:25:01 GMT + (which was 12/11/2000 18:25 GMT +0700 my Local Time) : >> Not sure what you mean by this. The SMTP RCPT TO is taken from the >> "To:" address line. The SMTP FROM envelope is taken from the "From:" >

Re[2]: Encryption of .TBB Mailboxes?

2000-11-12 Thread Alexander Turcic
Hello Januk, Sunday, November 12, 2000, 10:59:40 PM, you wrote: JA> No. TB used to use some encryption, but that was very weak, so they JA> removed all encryption. It is now up to the user to get a 3rd party JA> program to encrypt their data. Some other members have said that JA> PGPDisk work